Website review, no card needed

qualityimprint.com logo

qualityimprint.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 6 November 202639 issues · 113 checks

This review found 39 issues worth fixing on qualityimprint.com, 11 of them high impact, across 113 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
6.0 s4.2 sMay 16Oct 314.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20265.4 s
May 23, 20265.5 s
May 30, 20265.6 s
Jun 6, 20265.6 s
Jun 13, 20265.7 s
Jun 20, 20265.8 s
Jun 27, 20265.8 s
Jul 4, 20265.8 s
Jul 11, 20265.7 s
Jul 18, 20265.7 s
Jul 25, 20265.6 s
Aug 1, 20265.6 s
Aug 8, 20265.6 s
Aug 15, 20265.6 s
Aug 22, 20265.7 s
Aug 29, 20265.7 s
Sep 5, 20265.8 s
Sep 12, 20265.8 s
Sep 19, 20265.8 s
Sep 26, 20265.7 s
Oct 3, 20265.7 s
Oct 10, 20265.7 s
Oct 17, 20265.5 s
Oct 24, 20265.2 s
Oct 31, 20264.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
183 ms123 msMay 16Oct 31174 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026130 ms
May 23, 2026133 ms
May 30, 2026132 ms
Jun 6, 2026138 ms
Jun 13, 2026138 ms
Jun 20, 2026144 ms
Jun 27, 2026146 ms
Jul 4, 2026147 ms
Jul 11, 2026144 ms
Jul 18, 2026144 ms
Jul 25, 2026142 ms
Aug 1, 2026145 ms
Aug 8, 2026147 ms
Aug 15, 2026147 ms
Aug 22, 2026163 ms
Aug 29, 2026163 ms
Sep 5, 2026164 ms
Sep 12, 2026176 ms
Sep 19, 2026163 ms
Sep 26, 2026163 ms
Oct 3, 2026162 ms
Oct 10, 2026161 ms
Oct 17, 2026167 ms
Oct 24, 2026171 ms
Oct 31, 2026174 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of qualityimprint.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. qualityimprint.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. qualityimprint.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. qualityimprint.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. qualityimprint.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. qualityimprint.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. qualityimprint.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. qualityimprint.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. qualityimprint.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

qualityimprint.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

9 to fix60
  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and Facebook and others), adding 1.5 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    750 ms · 331 KiB

    17 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (331 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 60

    60/100

    Your mobile performance score is 60. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 667 KiB

    About 667 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    450 ms · 213 KiB

    5 images could be 213 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 440 ms

    440 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 440 ms of main-thread work and 526 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google CDN adds 250 ms

    250 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 250 ms of main-thread work and 584 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 2,828 HTML elements

    The page has 2,828 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Render-blocking requests

    250 ms

    16 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 250 ms.

  • 8 long tasks on the main thread

    8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 216 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 13 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    12 KiB

    About 12 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Minify JavaScript

    6 KiB

    6 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 7 ms

    7 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 7 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 19.2 s

    19.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 19.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.1 s

    7.1 s

    Your largest element takes 7.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Custom branded mugs and t-shirts being handed out at a trad…”.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Real visitors wait 2.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 31% slower for real visitors

    +31%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 130 ms to 174 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 868 ms

    868 ms

    Real visitors wait 868 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 5.0 s

    5.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 445 ms

    445 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 445 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 163 ms

    163 ms

    Real visitors wait 163 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 11% faster for real visitors

    -11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.4 s to 4.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix62
  • Page weight: 6.6 MB in 220 requests

    6.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.6 MB in 220 requests on a phone: media 3.0 MB (1), scripts 1.7 MB (72) and images 995 KiB (25). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    hero-unboxing.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 12 images below the first screen load straight away

    12 images further down the page (687 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (275 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.87 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.87 g of CO₂e: 224.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8390
  • Links look like plain text

    71 links inside paragraphs rely on colour alone to stand out.

  • Links must have discernible text (42 elements)

    Links must have discernible text: 42 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 13 text elements with low contrast

    13 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h2 → h5 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 217 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 47 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 7 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 8395
  • 15 links crawlers can't follow

    15 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • 414 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 414 pages on qualityimprint.com and 7 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 160 characters

    Your meta description is 160 characters: “Your number 1 source of quality promotional products. Get free art help, quotes, free samples and personalized service!…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Quality Promotional Products with Best Service in the Industry.”.

  • Title: 61 characters

    Your title is a healthy 61 characters: “QualityImprint: Promotional Products Imprinted with your Logo”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.qualityimprint.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.qualityimprint.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,839 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 1 page without a meta description

    /pages/favorites has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 196 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    6 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 6 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7376
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=26024360&Ver=2&mid=8c76716a-4309-4404-8f77-11196fa1689c&bo=1&sid=603560c0d98d11f18313d9a0674d8f05&vid=603587e0d98d11f1bff9f73bf42f45f5&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&lg.

  • 1 third-party cookie

    1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    48 of 54 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix93
  • 1 broken external link

    1 link to other sites is dead, for example https://www.shopify.com/pci-compliant?utm_source=secure&utm_medium=shop (404).

  • Short HSTS lifetime

    HSTS is set, but max-age is 91 days; one year is the recommended minimum.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

6 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (qualityimprint.com).

  • Valid certificate (45 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE2 verifies for qualityimprint.com and is valid for another 45 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://qualityimprint.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

Domain and trust

  • DNSSEC is off

    qualityimprint.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

3 checks passed
  • Domain is 16 years old

    16 years

    qualityimprint.com was registered in Jan 2010 through eNom, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Certificate issuers are restricted

    CAA records allow only ssl.com, digicert.com, globalsign.com and letsencrypt.org to issue certificates for qualityimprint.com, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.

  • Registered until Jan 2034

    qualityimprint.com is registered until Jan 2034.

Content and conversion

2 to fix83
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • About 2,815 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 2,815 words of visible text.

7 checks passed
  • 51 calls to action

    The homepage has 51 calls to action, for example “Shop By Type”, “Shop By Brand” and “Get A Free Quote”.

  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (6 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 79 testimonial or review blocks, 102 customer or partner logos, a star rating and 6 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 3 phone links and 3 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Email authentication

85
  • Email authentication score: 85/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 mx a ip4:209.85.167.194/32 ip4:209.85.167.196/32 ip4:142.250.4.26/32 ip4:173.194.202.26/32 ip4:108.177.9.26/32 i…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 7 trackers load before any consent

    7

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Ads and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 19 cookies set on arrival

    19

    Opening the homepage sets 19 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 41 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 41 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 4 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

None of the apps your storefront loads is on the list of apps with a known security problem.

Apps your storefront loads

Crazy Egg · powr.io · trustpilot.com · productcustomizer.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Shopify

Company

Headquarters
Diamond Bar

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 39 issues on qualityimprint.com, including 20 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25