Website review, no card needed

quantuma.com logo

quantuma.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202626 issues · 83 checks

This review found 26 issues worth fixing on quantuma.com, 9 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.7 s911 msMay 16Oct 311.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.3 s
May 23, 20261.4 s
May 30, 20261.6 s
Jun 6, 20261.5 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.5 s
Jun 27, 20261.3 s
Jul 4, 20261.2 s
Jul 11, 20261.1 s
Jul 18, 20261.1 s
Jul 25, 2026997 ms
Aug 1, 20261.2 s
Aug 8, 20261.4 s
Aug 15, 20261.5 s
Aug 22, 20261.5 s
Aug 29, 20261.4 s
Sep 5, 20261.2 s
Sep 12, 20261.2 s
Sep 19, 20261.2 s
Sep 26, 20261.3 s
Oct 3, 20261.2 s
Oct 10, 20261.2 s
Oct 17, 20261.2 s
Oct 24, 20261.2 s
Oct 31, 20261.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
79 ms61 msMay 16Oct 3163 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 202668 ms
May 23, 202670 ms
May 30, 202670 ms
Jun 6, 202669 ms
Jun 13, 202669 ms
Jun 20, 202670 ms
Jun 27, 202673 ms
Jul 4, 202676 ms
Jul 11, 202676 ms
Jul 18, 202676 ms
Jul 25, 202677 ms
Aug 1, 202674 ms
Aug 8, 202674 ms
Aug 15, 202671 ms
Aug 22, 202668 ms
Aug 29, 202663 ms
Sep 5, 202664 ms
Sep 12, 202667 ms
Sep 19, 202665 ms
Sep 26, 202668 ms
Oct 3, 202664 ms
Oct 10, 202664 ms
Oct 17, 202666 ms
Oct 24, 202670 ms
Oct 31, 202663 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of quantuma.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. quantuma.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. quantuma.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. quantuma.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. quantuma.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. quantuma.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. quantuma.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. quantuma.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. quantuma.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

6 to fix40
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.5 s

    9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.5 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    2.0 s · 246 KiB

    About 246 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 40

    40/100

    Your mobile performance score is 40. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    920 ms · 142 KiB

    About 142 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 920 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 263 ms

    263 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 263 ms of main-thread work and 325 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Cloudflare CDN adds 69 ms

    69 ms

    Cloudflare CDN costs a phone 69 ms of main-thread work and 458 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare CDN and LinkedIn Ads and others), adding 893 KiB and 371 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 41 KiB

    6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (41 KiB).

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 152 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 KiB

    3 images could be 150 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 350 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 224 ms

    224 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 224 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 10.5 s

    10.5 s

    Your largest element takes 10.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “The future of Leon Restaurants secured with over 530 jobs s…”.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.845

    0.845

    The layout shifts by 0.845 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Time to Interactive: 10.5 s

    10.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 10.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.4 s

    6.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 13 images without width and height

    13 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 68 ms to 63 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.3 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 64 ms

    64 ms

    Real visitors wait 64 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 608 ms

    608 ms

    Real visitors wait 608 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 103 ms

    103 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 103 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

100
  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (171 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (171 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.46 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.46 g of CO₂e: 55.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.6 MB in 56 requests

    1.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.6 MB in 56 requests on a phone: scripts 810 KiB (17), images 453 KiB (23) and stylesheets 253 KiB (5). That is a lean page.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8892
  • Unlabelled dropdowns

    2 dropdowns have no label.

  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (13 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 13 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Hidden but focusable

    2 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (3 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 32 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9291
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 3 links with vague text

    3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 145 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 145 pages on quantuma.com and 5 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 155 characters

    Your meta description is 155 characters: “Our experts advise on business transactions, assist in resolving disputes and help companies and individuals overcome o…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “About us”.

  • Title: 34 characters

    Your title is a healthy 34 characters: “Quantuma | a leading advisory firm”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.quantuma.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.quantuma.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.quantuma.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,459 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 6 pages without a meta description

    https://www.quantuma.com/contact, https://www.quantuma.com/our-team, https://www.quantuma.com/international, https://www.quantuma.com/insights, https://www.quantuma.com/events and https://www.quantuma.com/our-history have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 4 pages slow to respond

    https://www.quantuma.com/contact, https://www.quantuma.com/our-team, https://www.quantuma.com/about-us and https://www.quantuma.com/services took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 100 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 17 small tap targets

    17 of 33 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Invalid or unexpected token”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix92
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 11 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,244 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,244 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Get in touch today: 0330 531 660” and “Contact”.

  • 7 calls to action

    The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Get in touch today: 0330 531 660”, “Get in touch today: 0330 053 1660” and “Contact”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (3 fields at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and LinkedIn Insight (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Quantcast Choice) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 13 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 13 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Quantcast Choice

    A consent management tool (Quantcast Choice) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at quantuma.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Drupal 11 (https://www.drupal.org)
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Akamai Cloud

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 26 issues on quantuma.com, including 12 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25