Website review, no card needed
quantuma.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202626 issues · 83 checks
This review found 26 issues worth fixing on quantuma.com, 9 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
81BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 997 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 68 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 70 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 69 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 69 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 73 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 76 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 76 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 76 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 74 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 74 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 71 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 68 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 63 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 64 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 67 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 65 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 68 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 64 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 64 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 66 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 63 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
2.5 s9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.5 s.
Reduce unused CSS
2.0 s · 246 KiBAbout 246 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.0 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 40
40/100Your mobile performance score is 40. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Reduce unused JavaScript
920 ms · 142 KiBAbout 142 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 920 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 263 ms
263 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 263 ms of main-thread work and 325 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Cloudflare CDN adds 69 ms
69 msCloudflare CDN costs a phone 69 ms of main-thread work and 458 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare CDN and LinkedIn Ads and others), adding 893 KiB and 371 ms of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 41 KiB6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (41 KiB).
4 long tasks on the main thread
4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 152 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
150 KiB3 images could be 150 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.0 s
A phone's processor spends 1.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 350 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 224 ms
224 msYour server sent the HTML in 224 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 10.5 s
10.5 sYour largest element takes 10.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “The future of Leon Restaurants secured with over 530 jobs s…”.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.845
0.845The layout shifts by 0.845 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Time to Interactive: 10.5 s
10.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 10.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 6.4 s
6.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.7 s
2.7 sThe first text or image appears after 2.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
13 images without width and height
13 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 68 ms to 63 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.3 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors wait 1.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 64 ms
64 msReal visitors wait 64 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 608 ms
608 msReal visitors wait 608 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 103 ms
103 msScripts block the page for only 103 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
1 image in older formats
1 image (171 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (171 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit
0.46 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.46 g of CO₂e: 55.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Page weight: 1.6 MB in 56 requests
1.6 MBYour homepage downloads 1.6 MB in 56 requests on a phone: scripts 810 KiB (17), images 453 KiB (23) and stylesheets 253 KiB (5). That is a lean page.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Unlabelled dropdowns
2 dropdowns have no label.
3 text elements with low contrast
3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (13 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 13 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Hidden but focusable
2 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (3 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 32 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
3 links with vague text
3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
145 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 145 pages on quantuma.com and 5 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 155 characters
Your meta description is 155 characters: “Our experts advise on business transactions, assist in resolving disputes and help companies and individuals overcome o…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “About us”.
Title: 34 characters
Your title is a healthy 34 characters: “Quantuma | a leading advisory firm”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.quantuma.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.quantuma.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.quantuma.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,459 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
6 pages without a meta description
https://www.quantuma.com/contact, https://www.quantuma.com/our-team, https://www.quantuma.com/international, https://www.quantuma.com/insights, https://www.quantuma.com/events and https://www.quantuma.com/our-history have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
4 pages slow to respond
https://www.quantuma.com/contact, https://www.quantuma.com/our-team, https://www.quantuma.com/about-us and https://www.quantuma.com/services took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 100 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
17 small tap targets
17 of 33 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Invalid or unexpected token”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 11 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,244 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,244 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Get in touch today: 0330 531 660” and “Contact”.
7 calls to action
The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Get in touch today: 0330 531 660”, “Get in touch today: 0330 053 1660” and “Contact”.
1 short form
A short form (3 fields at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and LinkedIn Insight (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Quantcast Choice) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
5 cookies set on arrival
5Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
13 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 13 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Quantcast Choice
A consent management tool (Quantcast Choice) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at quantuma.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- Drupal 11 (https://www.drupal.org)
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Akamai Cloud
Hiring
- Hiring
- 2 open roles
- Job board
- careers page
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 26 issues on quantuma.com, including 12 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.