Website review, no card needed
quatenus.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202650 issues · 94 checks
This review found 50 issues worth fixing on quatenus.com, 22 of them high impact, across 94 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
67DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 5.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 5.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 5.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 218 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 209 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 223 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 262 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 271 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 302 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 309 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 287 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 294 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 255 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 221 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 209 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 243 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 260 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 309 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 333 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 333 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 317 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 248 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.8 s
1.7 s
2.5 s
3.4 s
4.2 s
5.0 s
5.9 s
6.7 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.9 s · 889 KiBAbout 889 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.4 s10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.
Mobile performance score: 47
47/100Your mobile performance score is 47. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 7.0 s
A phone's processor spends 7.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
650 ms · 5.5 MB84 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (5.5 MB).
Improve image delivery
100 ms · 3.7 MB17 images could be 3.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, leadconnectorhq.com and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 2.6 MB and 1.4 s of main-thread time.
Google CDN adds 454 ms
454 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 454 ms of main-thread work and 743 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
leadconnectorhq.com adds 383 ms
383 msleadconnectorhq.com costs a phone 383 ms of main-thread work and 1.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 82 KiBAbout 82 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 255 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
35 KiB35 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Legacy JavaScript
22 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 22 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 1 ms
1 msYour server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 5.2 s
5.2 sReal visitors wait 5.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Time to Interactive: 41.4 s
41.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 41.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 8.0 s
8.0 sYour largest element takes 8.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “GPS em tempo real, no computador e no telemóvel. Hardware, …”.
Speed Index: 12.8 s
12.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 747 ms
747 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 747 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user INP: 245 ms
245 msReal visitors wait 245 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 33% slower for real visitors
+33%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 218 ms to 248 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.7 s
2.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors wait 1.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.5 s to 5.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s
1.7 sThe first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001
0.001The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 10.5 MB in 263 requests
10.5 MBYour homepage downloads 10.5 MB in 263 requests on a phone: images 5.3 MB (63), scripts 2.4 MB (106) and other files 1.8 MB (36). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 4.7 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
7 images far larger than shown
552 KiB7 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example transformacao-digital-nas-empresas-quatenus.jpg at 1,440 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 552 KiB.
16 images in older formats
16 images (7.6 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
17 images below the first screen load straight away
17 images further down the page (7.0 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 3.0 g of CO₂ per visit
2.98 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.98 g of CO₂e: 357.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
16 text elements with low contrast
16 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Hidden but focusable
15 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
ARIA commands must have an accessible name (4 elements)
ARIA commands must have an accessible name: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (2 elements)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (1 element)
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (20 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 20 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (5 elements).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 31 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 12 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
63 internal links, 12 external
The homepage links to 63 pages on quatenus.com and 12 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 142 characters
Your meta description is 142 characters: “A Quatenus é especialista em monitorização e gestão de frotas em tempo real, com soluções inovadoras para empresas e pa…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Quatenus | Software de Gestão de Frotas e Localização GPS”.
Title: 57 characters
Your title is a healthy 57 characters: “Quatenus | Software de Gestão de Frotas e Localização GPS”.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.quatenus.com/sitemap/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.quatenus.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (587 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 31 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
21 small tap targets
21 of 50 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
5 JavaScript errors while loading
5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught Error: Looks like your website URL has changed. To ensure the proper functioning of your banner, update the re…”.
1 low-resolution image
1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 688 words of copy
The homepage carries about 688 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (CookieYes) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
9 cookies set on arrival
9Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
28 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 28 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: CookieYes
A consent management tool (CookieYes) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at quatenus.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- AWS
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 50 issues on quatenus.com, including 22 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.