Website review, no card needed
quidich.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202645 issues · 89 checks
This review found 45 issues worth fixing on quidich.com, 12 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
76CClosest competitors among Wix websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 106 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 102 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 102 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 104 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 99 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
4.2 s9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.2 s.
Improve image delivery
900 ms · 9.9 MB18 images could be 9.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
9.8 MB6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (9.8 MB).
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, website-files.com and cloudfront.net and others), adding 28.8 MB and 850 ms of main-thread time.
website-files.com adds 344 ms
344 mswebsite-files.com costs a phone 344 ms of main-thread work and 27.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused JavaScript
300 ms · 757 KiBAbout 757 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 60
60/100Your mobile performance score is 60 (desktop: 46). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Google CDN adds 354 ms
354 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 354 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 36 KiBAbout 36 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Minify CSS
300 ms · 10 KiB10 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Main-thread work: 2.4 s
A phone's processor spends 2.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
1,516 HTML elements
The page has 1,516 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 long tasks on the main thread
8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 94 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 4 ms
4 msYour server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 7.7 s
7.7 sYour largest element takes 7.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 14.0 s
14.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 14.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.6 s
4.6 sThe first text or image appears after 4.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.0 s
7.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user TTFB: 838 ms
838 msReal visitors wait 838 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
61 images without width and height
61 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 106 ms to 99 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Real-user INP: 99 ms
99 msReal visitors wait 99 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.04
0.04For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.04 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 17% faster for real visitors
-17%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.1 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 115 ms
115 msScripts block the page for only 115 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.038
0.038The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.038, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 29.8 MB in 140 requests
29.8 MBYour homepage downloads 29.8 MB in 140 requests on a phone: images 17.5 MB (85), media 9.7 MB (2) and scripts 1.6 MB (25). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
13 images in older formats
13 images (1.0 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
6 images far larger than shown
128 KiB6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 6166abb5949e085db737797f_quidich_logo-sml-LR.png at 600 px wide, shown at 154 px. Resized copies would save about 128 KiB.
7 images below the first screen load straight away
7 images further down the page (415 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 8.4 g of CO₂ per visit
8.43 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 8.43 g of CO₂e: 1012.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
2 text elements with low contrast
2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
<html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)
<html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Links look like plain text
1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.
1 image without alt text
1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (16 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 16 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
37 links without text
37 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
9 form fields without a label
9 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
No page language
The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
42 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 8 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
5 H1 headlines
There are 5 <h1> headlines (“THE MOVING CAMERA COMPANY”, “The Moving Camera Company” and “This site uses cookies. By using this website, yo…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.quidich.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
135 internal links, 72 external
The homepage links to 135 pages on quidich.com and 72 external pages.
4 checks passed
Meta description: 158 characters
Your meta description is 158 characters: “We empower live sports broadcast with immersive viewer experiences using special cameras (Drones and Buggies), AR (Dron…”.
Title: 53 characters
Your title is a healthy 53 characters: “Quidich Innovation Labs - We enhance Sports Broadcast”.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.quidich.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,462 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
4 pages without a meta description
https://www.quidich.com/about-us, https://www.quidich.com/partnerships, https://www.quidich.com/our-work and https://www.quidich.com/contact have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 52 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “"fs-cc" is not a function”.
3 distorted images
3 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
26 of 26 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,065 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,065 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
10 calls to action
The homepage has 10 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Contact Us” and “Learn More”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (4 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 39 testimonial or review blocks, 24 customer or partner logos and 2 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 3 email links.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and X (Twitter) Ads (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
5 cookies set on arrival
5Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
17 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at quidich.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2020.
Stack
- CMS
- Wix
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 45 issues on quidich.com, including 20 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.