Website review, no card needed

quidich.com logo

quidich.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202645 issues · 89 checks

This review found 45 issues worth fixing on quidich.com, 12 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.3 s2.2 sMay 2Oct 173.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20264.1 s
May 9, 20263.6 s
May 16, 20263.5 s
May 23, 20263.3 s
May 30, 20263.0 s
Jun 6, 20263.1 s
Jun 13, 20262.9 s
Jun 20, 20262.5 s
Jun 27, 20262.5 s
Jul 4, 20262.7 s
Jul 11, 20262.9 s
Jul 18, 20262.8 s
Jul 25, 20262.6 s
Aug 1, 20262.6 s
Aug 8, 20262.5 s
Aug 15, 20262.7 s
Aug 22, 20263.0 s
Aug 29, 20262.9 s
Sep 5, 20262.9 s
Sep 12, 20262.8 s
Sep 19, 20262.7 s
Sep 26, 20262.9 s
Oct 3, 20263.0 s
Oct 10, 20263.2 s
Oct 17, 20263.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
143 ms93 msMay 2Oct 1799 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026106 ms
May 9, 2026102 ms
May 16, 2026102 ms
May 23, 2026104 ms
May 30, 2026106 ms
Jun 6, 2026109 ms
Jun 13, 2026116 ms
Jun 20, 2026126 ms
Jun 27, 2026123 ms
Jul 4, 2026131 ms
Jul 11, 2026137 ms
Jul 18, 2026130 ms
Jul 25, 2026117 ms
Aug 1, 2026115 ms
Aug 8, 2026112 ms
Aug 15, 2026104 ms
Aug 22, 2026104 ms
Aug 29, 2026105 ms
Sep 5, 2026112 ms
Sep 12, 2026113 ms
Sep 19, 2026113 ms
Sep 26, 2026108 ms
Oct 3, 2026104 ms
Oct 10, 2026101 ms
Oct 17, 202699 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of quidich.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. quidich.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. quidich.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. quidich.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. quidich.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. quidich.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. quidich.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. quidich.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. quidich.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

12 to fix60
  • Render-blocking requests

    4.2 s

    9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.2 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    900 ms · 9.9 MB

    18 images could be 9.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    9.8 MB

    6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (9.8 MB).

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, website-files.com and cloudfront.net and others), adding 28.8 MB and 850 ms of main-thread time.

  • website-files.com adds 344 ms

    344 ms

    website-files.com costs a phone 344 ms of main-thread work and 27.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 757 KiB

    About 757 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 60

    60/100

    Your mobile performance score is 60 (desktop: 46). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Google CDN adds 354 ms

    354 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 354 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 36 KiB

    About 36 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify CSS

    300 ms · 10 KiB

    10 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Main-thread work: 2.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 1,516 HTML elements

    The page has 1,516 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 long tasks on the main thread

    8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 94 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.7 s

    7.7 s

    Your largest element takes 7.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 14.0 s

    14.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 14.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.6 s

    4.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.0 s

    7.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Real visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 838 ms

    838 ms

    Real visitors wait 838 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 61 images without width and height

    61 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 106 ms to 99 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 99 ms

    99 ms

    Real visitors wait 99 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.04

    0.04

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.04 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 17% faster for real visitors

    -17%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.1 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 115 ms

    115 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 115 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.038

    0.038

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.038, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix43
  • Page weight: 29.8 MB in 140 requests

    29.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 29.8 MB in 140 requests on a phone: images 17.5 MB (85), media 9.7 MB (2) and scripts 1.6 MB (25). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 13 images in older formats

    13 images (1.0 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 6 images far larger than shown

    128 KiB

    6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 6166abb5949e085db737797f_quidich_logo-sml-LR.png at 600 px wide, shown at 154 px. Resized copies would save about 128 KiB.

  • 7 images below the first screen load straight away

    7 images further down the page (415 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 8.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    8.43 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 8.43 g of CO₂e: 1012.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

10 to fixGoogle 8487
  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • <html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)

    <html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Links look like plain text

    1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (16 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 16 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 37 links without text

    37 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 9 form fields without a label

    9 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • No page language

    The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 8 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 10084
  • 5 H1 headlines

    There are 5 <h1> headlines (“THE MOVING CAMERA COMPANY”, “The Moving Camera Company” and “This site uses cookies. By using this website, yo…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.quidich.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 135 internal links, 72 external

    The homepage links to 135 pages on quidich.com and 72 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 158 characters

    Your meta description is 158 characters: “We empower live sports broadcast with immersive viewer experiences using special cameras (Drones and Buggies), AR (Dron…”.

  • Title: 53 characters

    Your title is a healthy 53 characters: “Quidich Innovation Labs - We enhance Sports Broadcast”.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.quidich.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,462 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 4 pages without a meta description

    https://www.quidich.com/about-us, https://www.quidich.com/partnerships, https://www.quidich.com/our-work and https://www.quidich.com/contact have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 52 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9291
  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “"fs-cc" is not a function”.

  • 3 distorted images

    3 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    26 of 26 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix75
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,065 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,065 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • 10 calls to action

    The homepage has 10 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Contact Us” and “Learn More”.

  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (4 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 39 testimonial or review blocks, 24 customer or partner logos and 2 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 3 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and X (Twitter) Ads (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 17 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at quidich.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2020.

Stack

CMS
Wix
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 45 issues on quidich.com, including 20 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25