Website review, no card needed
rajapack.it website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202644 issues · 92 checks
This review found 44 issues worth fixing on rajapack.it, 11 of them high impact, across 92 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
77CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 381 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 380 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 372 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 369 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 395 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 469 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 520 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 563 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 598 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 597 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 600 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 585 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 568 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 566 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 558 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 560 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 544 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 513 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 506 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 513 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 529 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 533 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 537 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 537 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 538 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.6 s
1.1 s
1.7 s
2.2 s
2.8 s
3.3 s
3.9 s
4.5 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.9 s4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.
Main-thread work: 5.0 s
A phone's processor spends 5.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
3,372 HTML elements
The page has 3,372 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 973 KiBAbout 973 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Optanon and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 2.5 MB and 866 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
940 ms · 112 KiBAbout 112 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 940 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 55
55/100Your mobile performance score is 55 (desktop: 44). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Google CDN adds 716 ms
716 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 716 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
650 ms · 105 KiB3 images could be 105 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 650 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 277 KiB51 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (277 KiB).
Adobe Scene7 adds 0 ms
0 msAdobe Scene7 costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
16 long tasks on the main thread
16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 190 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
21 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 101 ms
101 msYour server sent the HTML in 101 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 19.2 s
19.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 19.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 6.6 s
6.6 sYour largest element takes 6.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “OFFERTA DI BENVENUTO”.
Real-user INP: 397 ms
397 msReal visitors wait 397 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 41% slower for real visitors
+41%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 381 ms to 538 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Speed Index: 5.8 s
5.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 551 ms
551 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 551 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s
2.4 sThe first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
4 images without width and height
4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) got 12% slower for real visitors
+12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.3 s
2.3 sReal visitors wait 2.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.06
0.06For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.06 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.022
0.022The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.022, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.0 MB in 101 requests
4.0 MBYour homepage downloads 4.0 MB in 101 requests on a phone: scripts 1.9 MB (33), images 1.1 MB (38) and other files 445 KiB (12). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
2610-IT-BHP-L-stock-up-black-friday is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
4 images far larger than shown
64 KiB4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 2610-IT-BHP-L-stock-up-black-friday at 1,282 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 64 KiB.
2 images in older formats
2 images (147 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit
1.13 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.13 g of CO₂e: 135.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
3 buttons without a name
3 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
8 text elements with low contrast
8 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Links look like plain text
2 links inside paragraphs rely on colour alone to stand out.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
7 form fields without a label
7 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (16 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 16 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 173 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Meta description is long (188 characters)
Your meta description is 188 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
774 internal links, 27 external
The homepage links to 774 pages on rajapack.it and 27 external pages.
6 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Più di 7.000 imballaggi e attrezzature per il magazzino a stock, consegnati in 24/48h”.
Title: 52 characters
Your title is a healthy 52 characters: “RAJAPACK: scatole, imballaggi, buste, nastri adesivi”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.rajapack.it/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization, Tipo di azienda and Website.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.rajapack.it/sitemap/IT_SITEMAP_HTTPS.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.rajapack.it/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,990 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
4 pages share a title
https://www.rajapack.it/madeineurope_cms_000153.html, https://www.rajapack.it/segui-i-nostri-consigli_cms_000206.html, https://www.rajapack.it/novita_C9605.html and https://www.rajapack.it/ufficio-cancelleria/mobili-ufficio_C3020.html all use the title “Radware Bot Manager Captcha”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
4 pages without a meta description
https://www.rajapack.it/madeineurope_cms_000153.html, https://www.rajapack.it/segui-i-nostri-consigli_cms_000206.html, https://www.rajapack.it/novita_C9605.html and https://www.rajapack.it/ufficio-cancelleria/mobili-ufficio_C3020.html have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
4 pages with very little text
https://www.rajapack.it/madeineurope_cms_000153.html, https://www.rajapack.it/segui-i-nostri-consigli_cms_000206.html, https://www.rajapack.it/novita_C9605.html and https://www.rajapack.it/ufficio-cancelleria/mobili-ufficio_C3020.html have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 199 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 4 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'register')”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
82 of 91 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: a star rating. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 3,088 words of copy
The homepage carries about 3,088 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
5 short forms
5 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Opening hours shown
Your opening hours are on the homepage.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
27 cookies set on arrival
27Opening the homepage sets 27 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
9 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
2 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rajapack.it, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Company
- Founded
- 2006
- Headquarters
- Castel San Giovanni
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 44 issues on rajapack.it, including 22 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.