Website review, no card needed

rajapack.it logo

rajapack.it website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202644 issues · 92 checks

This review found 44 issues worth fixing on rajapack.it, 11 of them high impact, across 92 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.2 s1.8 sMay 2Oct 172.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.8 s
May 9, 20261.9 s
May 16, 20261.9 s
May 23, 20261.9 s
May 30, 20261.9 s
Jun 6, 20261.9 s
Jun 13, 20261.9 s
Jun 20, 20261.9 s
Jun 27, 20262.0 s
Jul 4, 20262.0 s
Jul 11, 20262.0 s
Jul 18, 20262.0 s
Jul 25, 20262.0 s
Aug 1, 20262.0 s
Aug 8, 20262.0 s
Aug 15, 20262.0 s
Aug 22, 20262.1 s
Aug 29, 20262.1 s
Sep 5, 20262.1 s
Sep 12, 20262.1 s
Sep 19, 20262.0 s
Sep 26, 20261.9 s
Oct 3, 20262.0 s
Oct 10, 20262.0 s
Oct 17, 20262.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
635 ms334 msMay 2Oct 17538 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026381 ms
May 9, 2026380 ms
May 16, 2026372 ms
May 23, 2026369 ms
May 30, 2026395 ms
Jun 6, 2026469 ms
Jun 13, 2026520 ms
Jun 20, 2026563 ms
Jun 27, 2026598 ms
Jul 4, 2026597 ms
Jul 11, 2026600 ms
Jul 18, 2026585 ms
Jul 25, 2026568 ms
Aug 1, 2026566 ms
Aug 8, 2026558 ms
Aug 15, 2026560 ms
Aug 22, 2026544 ms
Aug 29, 2026513 ms
Sep 5, 2026506 ms
Sep 12, 2026513 ms
Sep 19, 2026529 ms
Sep 26, 2026533 ms
Oct 3, 2026537 ms
Oct 10, 2026537 ms
Oct 17, 2026538 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of rajapack.it (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. rajapack.it at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. rajapack.it at 1.1 s1.1 s
  3. rajapack.it at 1.7 s1.7 s
  4. rajapack.it at 2.2 s2.2 s
  5. rajapack.it at 2.8 s2.8 s
  6. rajapack.it at 3.3 s3.3 s
  7. rajapack.it at 3.9 s3.9 s
  8. rajapack.it at 4.5 s4.5 s

Speed

11 to fix55
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.9 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.

  • Main-thread work: 5.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 3,372 HTML elements

    The page has 3,372 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 973 KiB

    About 973 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Optanon and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 2.5 MB and 866 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    940 ms · 112 KiB

    About 112 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 940 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 55

    55/100

    Your mobile performance score is 55 (desktop: 44). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Google CDN adds 716 ms

    716 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 716 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    650 ms · 105 KiB

    3 images could be 105 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 650 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 277 KiB

    51 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (277 KiB).

  • Adobe Scene7 adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    Adobe Scene7 costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 16 long tasks on the main thread

    16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 190 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    21 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 101 ms

    101 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 101 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 19.2 s

    19.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 19.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 6.6 s

    6.6 s

    Your largest element takes 6.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “OFFERTA DI BENVENUTO”.

  • Real-user INP: 397 ms

    397 ms

    Real visitors wait 397 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 41% slower for real visitors

    +41%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 381 ms to 538 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 5.8 s

    5.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 551 ms

    551 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 551 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 4 images without width and height

    4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 12% slower for real visitors

    +12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors wait 2.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.06

    0.06

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.06 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.022

    0.022

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.022, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix69
  • Page weight: 4.0 MB in 101 requests

    4.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.0 MB in 101 requests on a phone: scripts 1.9 MB (33), images 1.1 MB (38) and other files 445 KiB (12). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    2610-IT-BHP-L-stock-up-black-friday is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 4 images far larger than shown

    64 KiB

    4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 2610-IT-BHP-L-stock-up-black-friday at 1,282 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 64 KiB.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (147 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.13 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.13 g of CO₂e: 135.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 7789
  • 3 buttons without a name

    3 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 8 text elements with low contrast

    8 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Links look like plain text

    2 links inside paragraphs rely on colour alone to stand out.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 7 form fields without a label

    7 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (16 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 16 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 173 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9290
  • Meta description is long (188 characters)

    Your meta description is 188 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 774 internal links, 27 external

    The homepage links to 774 pages on rajapack.it and 27 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Più di 7.000 imballaggi e attrezzature per il magazzino a stock, consegnati in 24/48h”.

  • Title: 52 characters

    Your title is a healthy 52 characters: “RAJAPACK: scatole, imballaggi, buste, nastri adesivi”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.rajapack.it/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization, Tipo di azienda and Website.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.rajapack.it/sitemap/IT_SITEMAP_HTTPS.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.rajapack.it/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,990 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix88
  • 4 pages share a title

    https://www.rajapack.it/madeineurope_cms_000153.html, https://www.rajapack.it/segui-i-nostri-consigli_cms_000206.html, https://www.rajapack.it/novita_C9605.html and https://www.rajapack.it/ufficio-cancelleria/mobili-ufficio_C3020.html all use the title “Radware Bot Manager Captcha”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 4 pages without a meta description

    https://www.rajapack.it/madeineurope_cms_000153.html, https://www.rajapack.it/segui-i-nostri-consigli_cms_000206.html, https://www.rajapack.it/novita_C9605.html and https://www.rajapack.it/ufficio-cancelleria/mobili-ufficio_C3020.html have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 4 pages with very little text

    https://www.rajapack.it/madeineurope_cms_000153.html, https://www.rajapack.it/segui-i-nostri-consigli_cms_000206.html, https://www.rajapack.it/novita_C9605.html and https://www.rajapack.it/ufficio-cancelleria/mobili-ufficio_C3020.html have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 199 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 4 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'register')”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    82 of 91 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix67
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: a star rating. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 3,088 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 3,088 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • 5 short forms

    5 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

  • Opening hours shown

    Your opening hours are on the homepage.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 27 cookies set on arrival

    27

    Opening the homepage sets 27 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 9 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

2 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rajapack.it, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Tailwind CSS
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Company

Founded
2006
Headquarters
Castel San Giovanni

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 44 issues on rajapack.it, including 22 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25