Website review, no card needed

randstad.nl logo

randstad.nl website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202635 issues · 83 checks

This review found 35 issues worth fixing on randstad.nl, 9 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.5 s1.3 sMay 16Oct 311.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.4 s
May 23, 20261.4 s
May 30, 20261.4 s
Jun 6, 20261.4 s
Jun 13, 20261.4 s
Jun 20, 20261.5 s
Jun 27, 20261.5 s
Jul 4, 20261.4 s
Jul 11, 20261.4 s
Jul 18, 20261.5 s
Jul 25, 20261.5 s
Aug 1, 20261.4 s
Aug 8, 20261.4 s
Aug 15, 20261.4 s
Aug 22, 20261.4 s
Aug 29, 20261.4 s
Sep 5, 20261.3 s
Sep 12, 20261.3 s
Sep 19, 20261.3 s
Sep 26, 20261.3 s
Oct 3, 20261.3 s
Oct 10, 20261.3 s
Oct 17, 20261.3 s
Oct 24, 20261.4 s
Oct 31, 20261.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
148 ms135 msMay 16Oct 31146 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026136 ms
May 23, 2026136 ms
May 30, 2026137 ms
Jun 6, 2026138 ms
Jun 13, 2026138 ms
Jun 20, 2026138 ms
Jun 27, 2026139 ms
Jul 4, 2026139 ms
Jul 11, 2026140 ms
Jul 18, 2026141 ms
Jul 25, 2026140 ms
Aug 1, 2026140 ms
Aug 8, 2026141 ms
Aug 15, 2026142 ms
Aug 22, 2026143 ms
Aug 29, 2026143 ms
Sep 5, 2026143 ms
Sep 12, 2026142 ms
Sep 19, 2026142 ms
Sep 26, 2026141 ms
Oct 3, 2026142 ms
Oct 10, 2026142 ms
Oct 17, 2026142 ms
Oct 24, 2026144 ms
Oct 31, 2026146 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of randstad.nl (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. randstad.nl at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. randstad.nl at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. randstad.nl at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. randstad.nl at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. randstad.nl at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. randstad.nl at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. randstad.nl at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. randstad.nl at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

13 to fix60
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    7.2 s · 1.2 MB

    About 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 7.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    2.5 s · 516 KiB

    8 images could be 516 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.3 s

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.3 s.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (randstadgroep.nl, Google CDN and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 2.3 MB and 961 ms of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 60

    60/100

    Your mobile performance score is 60. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    550 ms · 104 KiB

    About 104 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 550 ms faster on a phone.

  • randstadgroep.nl adds 500 ms

    500 ms

    randstadgroep.nl costs a phone 500 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    450 ms · 74 KiB

    13 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (74 KiB).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    450 ms · 45 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 45 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google CDN adds 233 ms

    233 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 233 ms of main-thread work and 736 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 1,771 HTML elements

    The page has 1,771 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 139 ms

    139 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 139 ms of main-thread work and 350 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Document request latency

    121 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Minify JavaScript

    100 ms · 11 KiB

    11 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • 10 long tasks on the main thread

    10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 100 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 210 ms

    210 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 210 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 15.9 s

    15.9 s

    Your largest element takes 15.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Op deze website maken wij gebruik van cookies om het gebrui…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 17.5 s

    17.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 17.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.0 s

    7.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 23 images without width and height

    23 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Total Blocking Time: 219 ms

    219 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 219 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 136 ms to 146 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.4 s to 1.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 172 ms

    172 ms

    Real visitors wait 172 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.04

    0.04

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.04 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 800 ms

    800 ms

    Real visitors wait 800 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.042

    0.042

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.042, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 3.5 MB in 65 requests

    3.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.5 MB in 65 requests on a phone: scripts 2.1 MB (19), images 728 KiB (31) and other files 377 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (424 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (152 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.00 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.00 g of CO₂e: 120.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9295
  • 8 text elements with low contrast

    8 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 6 links without text

    6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 5 form fields without a label

    5 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 24 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 49 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 4 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9290
  • Title is long (80 characters)

    Your title is 80 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Randstad: het uitzendbureau met vaste banen & vacatures voor iedereen | Randstad”.

  • 3 links crawlers can't follow

    3 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 316 internal links, 28 external

    The homepage links to 316 pages on randstad.nl and 28 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 146 characters

    Your meta description is 146 characters: “Op een gemakkelijke, overzichtelijke manier de banenmarkt afspeuren voor die ideale (vaste) baan of de leukste vacature…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “vind jouw baan.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.randstad.nl/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Corporation.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.randstad.nl/job-sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.randstad.nl/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (959 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix88
  • 2 linked pages hidden from search

    https://www.randstad.nl/partner-for-talent/randstad-operational and https://www.randstad.nl/partner-for-talent/randstad-professional are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.randstad.nl/werknemers/vacatures/bewaarde-vacatures has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 111 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 6 small tap targets

    6 of 26 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://widgets.randstadgroep.nl/rgn-frontend/1.104.1/legacy-frontend/randstad-frontend/hu…”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 600 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 600 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 13 calls to action

    The homepage has 13 calls to action, for example “contact voor talent”, “contact” and “contact voor werkgevers”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 9 cookies set on arrival

    9

    Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 9 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at randstad.nl, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Hosting
AWS

Company

Employees
658,580
Founded
1960
Headquarters
Diemen

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 35 issues on randstad.nl, including 19 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25