Website review, no card needed
ravensoftware.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202647 issues · 83 checks
This review found 47 issues worth fixing on ravensoftware.com, 13 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 77.3 MB in 134 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
71CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 158 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 158 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 203 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 182 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 182 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 182 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 163 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.6 s
1.3 s
1.9 s
2.6 s
3.2 s
3.9 s
4.5 s
5.2 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.4 s8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.
Main-thread work: 4.6 s
A phone's processor spends 4.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
800 ms · 18.6 MB113 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (18.6 MB).
Improve image delivery
10.7 MB15 images could be 10.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and Optanon and others), adding 62.0 MB and 772 ms of main-thread time.
activision.com adds 0 ms
0 msactivision.com costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 61.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 53
53/100Your mobile performance score is 53. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
450 ms · 209 KiBAbout 209 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
450 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 450 ms).
Google CDN adds 378 ms
378 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 378 ms of main-thread work and 31 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 369 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
300 ms · 37 KiB37 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Google Tag Manager adds 288 ms
288 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 288 ms of main-thread work and 345 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
22 KiBAbout 22 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Legacy JavaScript
9 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 9 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 10.7 s
10.7 sYour largest element takes 10.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “OUR WORK SPEAKS FOR US”.
Time to Interactive: 16.3 s
16.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 16.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.282
0.282The layout shifts by 0.282 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Real-user INP: 217 ms
217 msReal visitors wait 217 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Speed Index: 4.0 s
4.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 4.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s
2.0 sThe first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
15 images without width and height
15 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Total Blocking Time: 232 ms
232 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 232 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 158 ms to 163 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 639 ms
639 msReal visitors wait 639 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 77.3 MB in 134 requests
77.3 MBYour homepage downloads 77.3 MB in 134 requests on a phone: media 63.4 MB (6), images 13.0 MB (80) and scripts 637 KiB (17). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images over 500 KB
3 images weigh 11.3 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
4 images far larger than shown
9.7 MB4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example laura-tab-image.jpg at 6,192 px wide, shown at 392 px. Resized copies would save about 9.7 MB.
12 images below the first screen load straight away
12 images further down the page (11.1 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
1 image in older formats
1 image (953 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 21.9 g of CO₂ per visit
21.90 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 21.90 g of CO₂e: 2627.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
2 images without alt text
2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (8 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
8 links without text
8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (14 characters)
Your title is only 14 characters: “Raven Software”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
Meta description is long (206 characters)
Your meta description is 206 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.ravensoftware.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at ravensoftware.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
14 internal links, 34 external
The homepage links to 14 pages on ravensoftware.com and 34 external pages.
2 checks passed
Structured data in place
Structured data found: VideoGame.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.ravensoftware.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (993 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
4 pages share 2 titles
/ and https://www.ravensoftware.com/home all use the title “Raven Software”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
4 pages without a meta description
https://www.ravensoftware.com/our-games, https://www.ravensoftware.com/social-impact, https://www.ravensoftware.com/blog/2026/02/call-of-duty-mobile-season-2-lunar-charge and https://www.ravensoftware.com/blog/2026/02/call-of-duty-black-ops-7-warzone-battle-pass-blackcell-store-season-02 have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
3 pages without an H1
https://www.ravensoftware.com/home, https://www.ravensoftware.com/blog/2026/02/call-of-duty-mobile-season-2-lunar-charge and https://www.ravensoftware.com/blog/2026/02/call-of-duty-black-ops-7-warzone-battle-pass-blackcell-store-season-02 have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
2 pages with very little text
https://www.ravensoftware.com/blog/2026/02/call-of-duty-mobile-season-2-lunar-charge and https://www.ravensoftware.com/blog/2026/02/call-of-duty-black-ops-7-warzone-battle-pass-blackcell-store-season-02 have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
5 internal pages checked
We fetched 5 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 5 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 5 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Synchronous `XMLHttpRequest` on the main thread is deprecated because of its detrimental effects to…”).
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
16 of 17 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 519 words of copy
The homepage carries about 519 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Join Us” and “join now”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 7 testimonial or review blocks and 1 customer or partner logo.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
7 cookies set on arrival
7Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
11 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ravensoftware.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Akamai
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 47 issues on ravensoftware.com, including 22 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.