Website review, no card needed
rebtel.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202633 issues · 76 checks
This review found 33 issues worth fixing on rebtel.com, 13 of them high impact, across 76 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
74CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 184 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 185 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 188 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 192 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 211 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 209 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 201 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 211 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 217 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 219 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 221 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 224 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 224 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 229 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.6 s · 1.0 MBAbout 1.0 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.6 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 43
43/100Your mobile performance score is 43 (desktop: 77). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
950 ms · 289 KiB6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (289 KiB).
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and TikTok and others), adding 1.5 MB and 805 ms of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 485 ms
485 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 485 ms of main-thread work and 876 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
500 ms · 69 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 69 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 500 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 2.5 s
A phone's processor spends 2.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 116 KiB3 images could be 116 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
13 long tasks on the main thread
13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 219 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
12 KiBAbout 12 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 77 but mobile only 43. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Minify JavaScript
3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 12 ms
12 msYour server sent the HTML in 12 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 18.7 s
18.7 sYour largest element takes 18.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Call or Send Recharges Worldwide”.
Time to Interactive: 19.3 s
19.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 19.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.3 s
4.3 sThe first text or image appears after 4.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.6 s
7.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 681 ms
681 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 681 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user INP: 262 ms
262 msReal visitors wait 262 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 23% slower for real visitors
+23%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 184 ms to 229 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user TTFB: 838 ms
838 msReal visitors wait 838 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 13% faster for real visitors
-13%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.8 MB in 110 requests
2.8 MBYour homepage downloads 2.8 MB in 110 requests on a phone: scripts 2.3 MB (66), images 235 KiB (12) and other files 149 KiB (26). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit
0.80 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.80 g of CO₂e: 96.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Invalid ARIA attributes
26 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
4 text elements with low contrast
4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
12 links without text
12 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 9 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
49 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 2 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
3 links with vague text
3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
33 internal links, 14 external
The homepage links to 33 pages on rebtel.com and 14 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 160 characters
Your meta description is 160 characters: “Make cheap calls abroad to any mobile or landline. You will enjoy top quality calls as you won't need any internet conn…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Call or Send Recharges Worldwide”.
Title: 56 characters
Your title is a healthy 56 characters: “Cheap International Calls and Unlimited Calling | Rebtel”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.rebtel.com/en.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.rebtel.com/en/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.rebtel.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (321 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
9 pages without a title
https://www.rebtel.com/en/rates/bangladesh, https://www.rebtel.com/en/rates/cameroon, https://www.rebtel.com/en/rates/cuba, https://www.rebtel.com/en/rates/ethiopia, https://www.rebtel.com/en/rates/ghana and https://www.rebtel.com/en/rates/india and 3 others have no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
9 pages without a meta description
https://www.rebtel.com/en/rates/bangladesh, https://www.rebtel.com/en/rates/cameroon, https://www.rebtel.com/en/rates/cuba, https://www.rebtel.com/en/rates/ethiopia, https://www.rebtel.com/en/rates/ghana and https://www.rebtel.com/en/rates/india and 3 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
5 pages share a meta description
https://www.rebtel.com/en/product/global, https://www.rebtel.com/en/about-us/how-it-works, https://www.rebtel.com/en/about-us/rebtel, https://www.rebtel.com/en/rates and https://www.rebtel.com/en/calling-cards use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 21 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Best practices
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Connecting to 'https://od-18c216b54e2045bdbb2d2f70bc4834b0.ecs.us-east-2.on.aws/events?cee=no' violates the following C…”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
10 of 11 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 257 words of copy
The homepage carries about 257 words of visible text.
1 checks passed
8 calls to action
The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Join”, “Buy now” and “Learn more”.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and TikTok Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
9 cookies set on arrival
9Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
15 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 15 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rebtel.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
- Hosting
- Vercel
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 33 issues on rebtel.com, including 16 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.