Website review, no card needed
recro.io website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202638 issues · 79 checks
This review found 38 issues worth fixing on recro.io, 13 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: main-thread work: 41.0 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
74CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 278 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 271 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 271 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 269 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 269 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 256 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 252 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 272 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 261 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 258 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 252 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 248 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 250 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 252 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 253 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 251 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 253 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 244 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 244 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 235 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 234 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 235 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 225 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 234 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 229 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
2.3 s
4.6 s
7.0 s
9.3 s
11.6 s
13.9 s
16.2 s
18.5 s
Speed
Main-thread work: 41.0 s
A phone's processor spends 41.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 11.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
framerusercontent.com adds 3.8 s
3.8 sframerusercontent.com costs a phone 3.8 s of main-thread work and 1.6 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.6 s · 824 KiBAbout 824 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.
Hotjar adds 1.9 s
1.9 sHotjar costs a phone 1.9 s of main-thread work and 71 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 27
27/100Your mobile performance score is 27. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (framerusercontent.com, Hotjar and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 2.7 MB and 7.0 s of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 689 ms
689 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 689 ms of main-thread work and 779 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 482 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 311 KiB30 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (311 KiB).
Improve image delivery
426 KiB6 images could be 426 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
1,572 HTML elements
The page has 1,572 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Legacy JavaScript
12 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 44 ms
44 msYour server sent the HTML in 44 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Total Blocking Time: 6.9 s
6.9 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 6.9 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Time to Interactive: 36.6 s
36.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 36.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 9.2 s
9.2 sYour largest element takes 9.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 15.4 s
15.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 15.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.0 s
4.0 sThe first text or image appears after 4.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user INP: 236 ms
236 msReal visitors wait 236 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 16% faster for real visitors
-16%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 278 ms to 229 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.049
0.049The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.049, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.9 MB in 178 requests
2.9 MBYour homepage downloads 2.9 MB in 178 requests on a phone: scripts 1.9 MB (66), images 838 KiB (50) and other files 97 KiB (57). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images far larger than shown
366 KiB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example YRDTp333Wh0vi7nUaDz7b6u1Q.png at 2,000 px wide, shown at 282 px. Resized copies would save about 366 KiB.
3 images below the first screen load straight away
3 images further down the page (446 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit
0.83 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.83 g of CO₂e: 99.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
2 tap targets too small
2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (48 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 48 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 61 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
36 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 43 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 36 passed and 7 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is long (239 characters)
Your meta description is 239 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
59 internal links, 4 external
The homepage links to 59 pages on recro.io and 4 external pages.
6 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Guaranteed AI Outcomes. Delivered by Our Team, or Yours”.
Title: 59 characters
Your title is a healthy 59 characters: “Recro: Developer-First Platform for the Right Opportunities”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.recro.io/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.recro.io/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.recro.io/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (728 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
13 pages share a title
/, https://www.recro.io/case-study, https://www.recro.io/about, https://www.recro.io/community, https://www.recro.io/ai-llm-acceleration and https://www.recro.io/contact and 7 others all use the title “Recro: Developer-First Platform for the Right Opportunities”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
12 pages share a meta description
https://www.recro.io/case-study, https://www.recro.io/about, https://www.recro.io/community, https://www.recro.io/ai-llm-acceleration, https://www.recro.io/contact and https://www.recro.io/partnerships and 6 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 page without an H1
https://www.recro.io/about has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
12 internal pages checked
We fetched 12 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 12 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 12 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 12 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
12 of 12 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
About 538 words of copy
The homepage carries about 538 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact” and “Book a call Book a call”.
8 calls to action
The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Book a callBook a call” and “Contact Us”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and LinkedIn Insight and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
13 cookies set on arrival
13Opening the homepage sets 13 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
30 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 30 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at recro.io, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- Framer
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Framer
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 38 issues on recro.io, including 19 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.