Website review, no card needed

redambiental.com logo

redambiental.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202636 issues · 77 checks

This review found 36 issues worth fixing on redambiental.com, 13 of them high impact, across 77 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.3 s3.9 sSep 19Oct 244.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Sep 19, 20264.3 s
Sep 26, 20264.0 s
Oct 3, 20263.9 s
Oct 10, 20264.1 s
Oct 17, 20264.1 s
Oct 24, 20264.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
193 ms156 msSep 19Oct 24177 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Sep 19, 2026189 ms
Sep 26, 2026160 ms
Oct 3, 2026167 ms
Oct 10, 2026169 ms
Oct 17, 2026168 ms
Oct 24, 2026177 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of redambiental.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. redambiental.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. redambiental.com at 1.0 s1.0 s
  3. redambiental.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  4. redambiental.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  5. redambiental.com at 2.5 s2.5 s
  6. redambiental.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  7. redambiental.com at 3.5 s3.5 s
  8. redambiental.com at 4.0 s4.0 s

Speed

10 to fix58
  • Improve image delivery

    2.2 s · 1.1 MB

    13 images could be 1.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.3 MB

    8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.3 MB).

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (ucontactcloud.com, Google Tag Manager and Google Fonts and others), adding 1.9 MB and 945 ms of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 58

    58/100

    Your mobile performance score is 58. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • ucontactcloud.com adds 675 ms

    675 ms

    ucontactcloud.com costs a phone 675 ms of main-thread work and 1.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 359 KiB

    About 359 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 621 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 270 ms

    270 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 270 ms of main-thread work and 180 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Google Fonts adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    Google Fonts costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 407 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    168 KiB

    About 168 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 20 ms

    20 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 20 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.5 s

    4.5 s

    Real visitors wait 4.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 1.02

    1.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 1.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 17.1 s

    17.1 s

    Your largest element takes 17.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Usamos Google Analytics y cookies analíticas para medir las…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 23.6 s

    23.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 23.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 984 ms

    984 ms

    Real visitors wait 984 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 587 ms

    587 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 587 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 4.4 s

    4.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 11 images without width and height

    11 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 189 ms to 177 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.3 s to 4.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 170 ms

    170 ms

    Real visitors wait 170 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.0 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

3 to fix43
  • Page weight: 5.0 MB in 74 requests

    5.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.0 MB in 74 requests on a phone: images 3.0 MB (45), scripts 1.0 MB (14) and fonts 814 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 7 images far larger than shown

    932 KiB

    7 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example monitoreo_1.webp at 1,600 px wide, shown at 350 px. Resized copies would save about 932 KiB.

  • 4 images below the first screen load straight away

    4 images further down the page (480 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.43 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.43 g of CO₂e: 171.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9693
  • Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (3 elements)

    Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (2 elements)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 39 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 3 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 10091
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • One H1 headline

    Your <h1> is empty.

  • 31 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 31 pages on redambiental.com and 8 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 152 characters

    Your meta description is 152 characters: “Soluciones de recolección, tratamiento y disposición de residuos para ciudades, industrias y comercios en México. Conoc…”.

  • Title: 44 characters

    Your title is a healthy 44 characters: “Gestión integral de residuos | Red Ambiental”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://redambiental.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://redambiental.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://redambiental.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (602 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 12 internal pages checked

    We fetched 12 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 12 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 12 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 12 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “ERROR TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'addEventListener')”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    15 of 15 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix30
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 507 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 507 words of visible text.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 1 other company contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 1 host run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at redambiental.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Angular
Hosting
Azure

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 36 issues on redambiental.com, including 20 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25