Website review, no card needed
redmagic.tech website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202635 issues · 87 checks
This review found 35 issues worth fixing on redmagic.tech, 15 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
83B- #22,943 of 99,029 reviewed websitesbeats 72%
- #14,673 of 54,190 online storesbeats 67%
- #14,213 of 49,163 Shopify storesbeats 64%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 2.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 262 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 259 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 257 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 255 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 266 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 275 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 273 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 263 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 246 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 237 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 244 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 249 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 247 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 238 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 223 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 214 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 219 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 223 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 235 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 237 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 233 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 232 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 229 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 228 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 221 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
2.1 s
4.3 s
6.4 s
8.5 s
10.7 s
12.8 s
15.0 s
17.1 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
6.5 s · 1.4 MBAbout 1.4 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.5 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
4.3 s · 849 KiB31 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (849 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
1.4 s12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.
Mobile performance score: 42
42/100Your mobile performance score is 42. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.7 s
A phone's processor spends 4.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
3,358 HTML elements
The page has 3,358 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Clarity and others), adding 2.1 MB and 1.3 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
750 ms · 75 KiBAbout 75 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 489 ms
489 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 489 ms of main-thread work and 740 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
417 KiB14 images could be 417 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
seel.com adds 149 ms
149 msseel.com costs a phone 149 ms of main-thread work and 415 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google CDN adds 93 ms
93 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 93 ms of main-thread work and 383 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
14 long tasks on the main thread
14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 223 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
100 ms · 62 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 62 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.
Duplicated JavaScript
11 KiB11 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 12 ms
12 msYour server sent the HTML in 12 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 27.8 s
27.8 sYour largest element takes 27.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 29.6 s
29.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 29.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 6.5 s
6.5 sThe first text or image appears after 6.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.2 s
10.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 561 ms
561 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 561 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
9 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 173 ms
173 msReal visitors wait 173 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 388 ms
388 msReal visitors wait 388 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 14% faster for real visitors
-14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 262 ms to 221 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 10% faster for real visitors
-10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.3 MB in 385 requests
6.3 MBYour homepage downloads 6.3 MB in 385 requests on a phone: scripts 3.0 MB (98), images 1.8 MB (78) and other files 1.2 MB (189). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
1536_1350_2x_948d570e-c635-4c5b-9eab-255a1e4f074f_x675.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 1.8 g of CO₂ per visit
1.79 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.79 g of CO₂e: 215.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
17 text elements with low contrast
17 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
6 tap targets too small
6 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Form elements should have a visible label (1 element)
Form elements should have a visible label: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (9 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 9 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
15 links without text
15 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
5 form fields without a label
5 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h3 → h6, h3 → h6 and h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 134 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
52 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 59 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Meta description is long (217 characters)
Your meta description is 217 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
12 links crawlers can't follow
12 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
9 links with vague text
9 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
One H1 headline
Your <h1> is empty.
200 internal links, 8 external
The homepage links to 200 pages on redmagic.tech and 8 external pages.
6 checks passed
Title: 43 characters
Your title is a healthy 43 characters: “REDMAGIC | Win More Games – REDMAGIC (INTL)”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://redmagic.tech/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://redmagic.tech/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,952 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://redmagic.tech/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
2 pages without a meta description
https://redmagic.tech/collections/redmagic-tablet-accessories and https://redmagic.tech/collections/redmagic-tablet have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
9 pages without an H1
https://redmagic.tech/pages/redmagic-12-pro, https://redmagic.tech/pages/redmagic-12-pro-launch, https://redmagic.tech/pages/redmagic-11s-pro, https://redmagic.tech/pages/redmagic-11-air, https://redmagic.tech/pages/redmagic-11-pro and https://redmagic.tech/collections/redmagic-phone-accessories and 3 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 79 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 third-party cookies
2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_CONNECTION_RESET”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
25 of 25 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,137 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,137 words of visible text.
6 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “LEARN MORE” and “JOIN NOW”.
11 calls to action
The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “LEARN MORE”, “JOIN NOW” and “BUY NOW”.
6 short forms
6 short forms (4 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 29 testimonial or review blocks and 20 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity and Hotjar.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
14 trackers load before any consent
14Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Criteo, Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager and 9 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
37 cookies set on arrival
37Opening the homepage sets 37 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
62 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 62 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at redmagic.tech, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 12 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Judge Me Reviews · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Eventhub Theme Redmagic · Seowill Ai Seo · Convbox Analytics · Gorgias Live Chat Helpdesk · Smart Seo · Microsoft Clarity · Pushowl · riskified.com · cloudfront.net · amazonaws.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Hotjar | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 35 issues on redmagic.tech, including 17 speed issues and 4 SEO issues. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.