Website review, no card needed

reform.at logo

reform.at website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202635 issues · 82 checks

This review found 35 issues worth fixing on reform.at, 6 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.3 s1.1 sApr 25Oct 101.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 20261.1 s
May 2, 20261.1 s
May 9, 20261.1 s
May 16, 20261.2 s
May 23, 20261.2 s
May 30, 20261.2 s
Jun 6, 20261.2 s
Jun 13, 20261.2 s
Jun 20, 20261.2 s
Jun 27, 20261.2 s
Jul 4, 20261.2 s
Jul 11, 20261.2 s
Jul 18, 20261.2 s
Jul 25, 20261.2 s
Aug 1, 20261.2 s
Aug 8, 20261.3 s
Aug 15, 20261.3 s
Aug 22, 20261.3 s
Aug 29, 20261.3 s
Sep 5, 20261.3 s
Sep 12, 20261.3 s
Sep 19, 20261.2 s
Sep 26, 20261.2 s
Oct 3, 20261.3 s
Oct 10, 20261.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
111 ms83 msApr 25Oct 10108 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 25, 202686 ms
May 2, 202686 ms
May 9, 202686 ms
May 16, 202687 ms
May 23, 202687 ms
May 30, 202689 ms
Jun 6, 202689 ms
Jun 13, 202688 ms
Jun 20, 202688 ms
Jun 27, 202688 ms
Jul 4, 202689 ms
Jul 11, 202691 ms
Jul 18, 202691 ms
Jul 25, 202691 ms
Aug 1, 202691 ms
Aug 8, 202691 ms
Aug 15, 202692 ms
Aug 22, 202694 ms
Aug 29, 202696 ms
Sep 5, 202697 ms
Sep 12, 202697 ms
Sep 19, 2026100 ms
Sep 26, 2026102 ms
Oct 3, 2026105 ms
Oct 10, 2026108 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of reform.at (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. reform.at at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. reform.at at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. reform.at at 1.3 s1.3 s
  4. reform.at at 1.7 s1.7 s
  5. reform.at at 2.1 s2.1 s
  6. reform.at at 2.5 s2.5 s
  7. reform.at at 2.9 s2.9 s
  8. reform.at at 3.4 s3.4 s

Speed

6 to fix74
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.7 s

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.7 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 74

    74/100

    Your mobile performance score is 74 (desktop: 99). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Font display

    650 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 650 ms).

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    350 ms · 252 KiB

    26 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (252 KiB).

  • Improve image delivery

    300 ms · 146 KiB

    6 images could be 146 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 85 KiB

    About 85 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 150 KiB

    About 150 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Other Google APIs/SDKs, adtrafficquality.google and Google/Doubleclick Ads and others), adding 269 KiB and 118 ms of main-thread time.

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 50 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 99 but mobile only 74. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Minify CSS

    4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 347 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 123 ms

    123 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 123 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.8 s

    5.8 s

    Your largest element takes 5.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below. Most of its time is resource load delay (2.5 s).

  • Tap response (INP) got 24% slower for real visitors

    +24%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 86 ms to 108 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Speed Index: 5.4 s

    5.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 6.0 s

    6.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 6.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 12% slower for real visitors

    +12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.1 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

9 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 119 ms

    119 ms

    Real visitors wait 119 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 745 ms

    745 ms

    Real visitors wait 745 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002

    0.002

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

3 to fix65
  • Page weight: 3.0 MB in 65 requests

    3.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.0 MB in 65 requests on a phone: images 2.3 MB (34), scripts 319 KiB (13) and fonts 302 KiB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 15 images in older formats

    15 images (723 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    30 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example csm_KMC_Neu_5x2_03be32a9b2.jpg at 1,296 px wide, shown at 366 px. Resized copies would save about 30 KiB.

  • 4 images below the first screen load straight away

    4 images further down the page (205 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.85 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.85 g of CO₂e: 102.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8891
  • 15 text elements with low contrast

    15 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark (3 elements)

    Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 7 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 7789
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (228 characters)

    Your meta description is 228 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • Invalid hreflang

    Your hreflang tags are invalid, so Google may show the wrong language version.

  • 94 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 94 pages on reform.at and 8 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Die REFORM Produktgruppen”.

  • Title: 53 characters

    Your title is a healthy 53 characters: “REFORM - REFORM Kommunalfahrzeuge und Berglandtechnik”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.reform.at/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.reform.at/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.reform.at/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (398 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

5 to fix76
  • 3 pages share a title

    https://www.reform.at/en, https://www.reform.at/fr and https://www.reform.at/it all use the title “REFORM - Home”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 8 pages without a meta description

    https://www.reform.at/produkte, https://www.reform.at/produkte/metrac, https://www.reform.at/produkte/muli, https://www.reform.at/produkte/boki, https://www.reform.at/produkte/boki-mini and https://www.reform.at/produkte/motech and 2 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 3 pages share a meta description

    https://www.reform.at/en, https://www.reform.at/fr and https://www.reform.at/it use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.reform.at/fanshop, whose canonical is https://www.reform.at/fanshop/en. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://www.reform.at/produkte and https://www.reform.at/produkte/anbaugeraete have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://www.reform.at/produkte/anbaugeraete has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 52 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 5 small tap targets

    5 of 19 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://www.google.com/cse/static/element/3735a6ee3000c0cb/default_v6+en.css' from origin …”.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 334 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 334 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Download”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 7 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at reform.at, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Hiring

Hiring
2 open roles
Teams
Engineering (2)
Job board
ashby

Company

Founded
1910
Headquarters
Wels

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 35 issues on reform.at, including 11 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25