Website review, no card needed

regenlabs.com logo

regenlabs.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 13 November 202631 issues · 80 checks

This review found 31 issues worth fixing on regenlabs.com, 9 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.3 s1.2 sMay 23Nov 71.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20263.1 s
May 30, 20263.1 s
Jun 6, 20262.7 s
Jun 13, 20262.5 s
Jun 20, 20262.5 s
Jun 27, 20262.0 s
Jul 4, 20261.8 s
Jul 11, 20261.9 s
Jul 18, 20262.1 s
Jul 25, 20262.2 s
Aug 1, 20262.2 s
Aug 8, 20262.2 s
Aug 15, 20262.1 s
Aug 22, 20261.9 s
Aug 29, 20261.8 s
Sep 5, 20261.6 s
Sep 12, 20261.5 s
Sep 19, 20261.6 s
Sep 26, 20261.6 s
Oct 3, 20261.7 s
Oct 10, 20261.7 s
Oct 17, 20261.6 s
Oct 24, 20261.6 s
Nov 7, 20261.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
161 ms96 msMay 23Sep 19106 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026116 ms
May 30, 2026111 ms
Jun 6, 2026112 ms
Jun 20, 2026112 ms
Jun 27, 2026108 ms
Jul 4, 2026105 ms
Jul 11, 2026114 ms
Jul 18, 2026125 ms
Jul 25, 2026144 ms
Aug 1, 2026142 ms
Aug 15, 2026153 ms
Aug 22, 2026144 ms
Aug 29, 2026145 ms
Sep 5, 2026103 ms
Sep 12, 2026111 ms
Sep 19, 2026106 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of regenlabs.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. regenlabs.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. regenlabs.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. regenlabs.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. regenlabs.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. regenlabs.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. regenlabs.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. regenlabs.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. regenlabs.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

7 to fix55
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.4 s · 644 KiB

    About 644 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 4.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 55

    55/100

    Your mobile performance score is 55. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (rebuyengine.com, Klaviyo and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 1.3 MB and 768 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    500 ms · 214 KiB

    14 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (214 KiB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    350 ms

    9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 350 ms.

  • rebuyengine.com adds 148 ms

    148 ms

    rebuyengine.com costs a phone 148 ms of main-thread work and 332 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    200 ms · 66 KiB

    1 image could be 66 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 97 KiB

    About 97 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 13 long tasks on the main thread

    13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 216 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    100 ms · 53 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 53 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    7 KiB

    7 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 8 ms

    8 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 8 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 10.3 s

    10.3 s

    Your largest element takes 10.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 15.0 s

    15.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 15.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.1 s

    6.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 431 ms

    431 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 431 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 116 ms to 106 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.09

    0.09

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.09 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 50% faster for real visitors

    -50%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.1 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.078

    0.078

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.078, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.8 MB in 257 requests

    2.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.8 MB in 257 requests on a phone: scripts 1.4 MB (97), other files 811 KiB (117) and fonts 365 KiB (18). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.80 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.80 g of CO₂e: 96.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 8488
  • 34 text elements with low contrast

    34 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 10 tap targets too small

    10 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (2 elements)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (74 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 74 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 11 form fields without a label

    11 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 8 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 8593
  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Regen Labs®” and “Clean Science.Real Results.”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 3 links crawlers can't follow

    3 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 65 internal links, 4 external

    The homepage links to 65 pages on regenlabs.com and 4 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 160 characters

    Your meta description is 160 characters: “Regen Labs offers doctor-formulated, doctor-approved supplements with science-backed ingredients to support your health…”.

  • Title: 59 characters

    Your title is a healthy 59 characters: “Supplements And Vitamins | Future Of Medicine® | Regen Labs”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://regenlabs.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://regenlabs.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,262 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://regenlabs.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 5 pages without a meta description

    https://regenlabs.com/blogs/doctors-articles, https://regenlabs.com/policies/privacy-policy, https://regenlabs.com/policies/refund-policy, https://regenlabs.com/policies/shipping-policy and https://regenlabs.com/policies/terms-of-service have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 10 pages without an H1

    https://regenlabs.com/collections/all, https://regenlabs.com/products/liquid-facelift, https://regenlabs.com/products/neurodrive, https://regenlabs.com/products/instazen, https://regenlabs.com/products/liplixir and https://regenlabs.com/pages/our-story and 4 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 16 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 7 small tap targets

    7 of 18 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix93
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • About 1,127 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,127 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SHOP” and “CONTACT”.

  • 11 calls to action

    The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Shop”, “Contact” and “Shop Best Sellers”.

  • 15 short forms

    15 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 9 testimonial or review blocks, a star rating, 1 trust badge and “35,000 + Happy Customers”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 23 cookies set on arrival

    23

    Opening the homepage sets 23 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 36 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 36 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at regenlabs.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 8 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Uppromote Affiliate · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Videowise Video Commerce · Judge Me Reviews · Affliate By Secomapp · Applovin Shop Integration · rechargecdn.com · rebuyengine.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 31 issues on regenlabs.com, including 12 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25