Website review, no card needed

rekt.com logo

rekt.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 8 November 202620 issues · 73 checks

This review found 20 issues worth fixing on rekt.com, 7 of them high impact, across 73 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.5 s1.9 sJun 13Oct 312.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Jun 13, 20263.3 s
Jun 20, 20263.0 s
Jun 27, 20263.0 s
Jul 4, 20263.0 s
Jul 11, 20263.2 s
Jul 18, 20263.1 s
Jul 25, 20262.9 s
Aug 1, 20262.8 s
Aug 8, 20262.4 s
Aug 15, 20262.4 s
Aug 22, 20262.5 s
Aug 29, 20262.6 s
Sep 5, 20262.5 s
Sep 12, 20262.5 s
Sep 19, 20262.3 s
Sep 26, 20262.3 s
Oct 3, 20262.5 s
Oct 10, 20262.3 s
Oct 17, 20262.4 s
Oct 24, 20262.3 s
Oct 31, 20262.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
196 ms121 msJun 13Oct 31142 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Jun 13, 2026187 ms
Jun 20, 2026154 ms
Jun 27, 2026156 ms
Jul 4, 2026149 ms
Jul 11, 2026135 ms
Jul 18, 2026135 ms
Jul 25, 2026133 ms
Aug 1, 2026138 ms
Aug 8, 2026147 ms
Aug 15, 2026161 ms
Aug 22, 2026161 ms
Aug 29, 2026161 ms
Sep 5, 2026156 ms
Sep 12, 2026153 ms
Sep 19, 2026135 ms
Sep 26, 2026139 ms
Oct 3, 2026137 ms
Oct 10, 2026130 ms
Oct 17, 2026137 ms
Oct 24, 2026131 ms
Oct 31, 2026142 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of rekt.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. rekt.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. rekt.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. rekt.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. rekt.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. rekt.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. rekt.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. rekt.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. rekt.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

4 to fix86
  • Mobile performance score: 86

    86/100

    Your mobile performance score is 86. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Render-blocking requests

    750 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 750 ms.

  • Improve image delivery

    400 ms · 126 KiB

    5 images could be 126 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 400 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 120 KiB

    About 120 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (avada.io, ipbase.com and geojs.io and others), adding 198 KiB and 62 ms of main-thread time.

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 67 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    14 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 14 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 381 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 9 ms

    9 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 9 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    Your largest element takes 4.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Rekt x FaZe W Melon launch banner”.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 5.5 s

    5.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 5.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

9 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 165 ms

    165 ms

    Real visitors wait 165 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 638 ms

    638 ms

    Real visitors wait 638 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 20% faster for real visitors

    -20%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 187 ms to 142 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 30% faster for real visitors

    -30%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.3 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Speed Index: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 2.3 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.003

    0.003

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.003, good is under 0.1).

  • First Contentful Paint: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 0.9 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Total Blocking Time: 11 ms

    11 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 11 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

2 to fix86
  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    image is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    13 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example rekt_logo.svg at 300 px wide, shown at 93 px. Resized copies would save about 13 KiB.

  • About 0.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.29 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.29 g of CO₂e: 34.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.0 MB in 48 requests

    1.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.0 MB in 48 requests on a phone: scripts 525 KiB (20), images 345 KiB (12) and fonts 111 KiB (3). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 8891
  • 12 tap targets too small

    12 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 4 text elements with low contrast

    4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (2 elements)

    Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 19 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 5 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

Google 100100
  • 32 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 32 pages on rekt.com and 8 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 103 characters

    Your meta description is 103 characters: “Clean energy drinks, powders, and sparkling water. Zero sugar. Improved focus. For whatever comes next.”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Clean Energy Drinks and Powders for Whatever Comes Next”.

  • Title: 32 characters

    Your title is a healthy 32 characters: “Rekt - Clean Energy. Zero Sugar.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://rekt.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://rekt.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://rekt.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description; contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (891 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix78
  • 1 page points its canonical at the homepage

    https://rekt.com/faze declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.

  • 2 pages share a title

    / and https://rekt.com/faze all use the title “Rekt - Clean Energy. Zero Sugar.”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://rekt.com/faze has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    https://rekt.com/products/rekt-casuals-rwd-tshirt took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 22 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “The Content Security Policy directive 'upgrade-insecure-requests' is ignored when delivered in a report-only policy.”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    17 of 17 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix93
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • About 877 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 877 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop the Rekt x FaZe W Melon collection”.

  • 10 calls to action

    The homepage has 10 calls to action, for example “Shop the Rekt x FaZe W Melon collection”, “Shop Drinks” and “Shop Powder”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 6 testimonial or review blocks, a star rating and 10 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Meta Pixel.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 1 other company contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 1 host run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rekt.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

No apps were seen in the code your storefront loads.

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
E-commerce
Shopify
Hosting
Vercel

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 20 issues on rekt.com, including 9 speed issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25