Website review, no card needed

rembeauty.com logo

rembeauty.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 8 November 202617 issues · 58 checks

This review found 17 issues worth fixing on rembeauty.com, 5 of them high impact, across 58 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Google's speed test didn't respond, so speed is not measured here; your full playbook measures it. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Site score

Not scored yet: Google's speed test didn't run in this review. Re-run the review to get a score.

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.8 s1.4 sMay 16Oct 311.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.5 s
May 23, 20261.5 s
May 30, 20261.4 s
Jun 6, 20261.4 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.7 s
Jun 27, 20261.7 s
Jul 4, 20261.7 s
Jul 11, 20261.6 s
Jul 18, 20261.6 s
Jul 25, 20261.6 s
Aug 1, 20261.7 s
Aug 8, 20261.7 s
Aug 15, 20261.7 s
Aug 22, 20261.7 s
Aug 29, 20261.7 s
Sep 5, 20261.8 s
Sep 12, 20261.8 s
Sep 19, 20261.8 s
Sep 26, 20261.7 s
Oct 3, 20261.6 s
Oct 10, 20261.6 s
Oct 17, 20261.6 s
Oct 24, 20261.6 s
Oct 31, 20261.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
243 ms156 msMay 16Oct 31204 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026170 ms
May 23, 2026168 ms
May 30, 2026167 ms
Jun 6, 2026166 ms
Jun 13, 2026185 ms
Jun 20, 2026191 ms
Jun 27, 2026197 ms
Jul 4, 2026194 ms
Jul 11, 2026188 ms
Jul 18, 2026193 ms
Jul 25, 2026195 ms
Aug 1, 2026203 ms
Aug 8, 2026218 ms
Aug 15, 2026221 ms
Aug 22, 2026221 ms
Aug 29, 2026222 ms
Sep 5, 2026228 ms
Sep 12, 2026229 ms
Sep 19, 2026233 ms
Sep 26, 2026231 ms
Oct 3, 2026210 ms
Oct 10, 2026203 ms
Oct 17, 2026196 ms
Oct 24, 2026195 ms
Oct 31, 2026204 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

No screenshot is available for this review.

Speed

Not measured in this review.

Core Web Vitals

2 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on your site (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user INP: 210 ms

    210 ms

    Real visitors wait 210 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 18% slower for real visitors

    +18%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 170 ms to 204 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 396 ms

    396 ms

    Real visitors wait 396 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 4.5 MB

    4.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.5 MB on a phone, 331 KiB of it images (7%). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (90 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.27 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.27 g of CO₂e: 152.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fix94
  • Form elements must have labels (4 elements)

    Form elements must have labels: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (6 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 17 links without text

    17 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings should not be empty (12 elements)

    Headings should not be empty: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 119 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 52 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 4 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fix84
  • Title is long (73 characters)

    Your title is 73 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “r.e.m. beauty - vegan & cruelty-free makeup by Ariana Grande – rem beauty”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (290 characters)

    Your meta description is 290 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 264 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 264 pages on rembeauty.com and 7 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “the beauty ofeveryday artistry”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://rembeauty.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://rembeauty.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://rembeauty.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,796 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://rembeauty.com/policies/shipping-policy has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 97 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    9 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 9 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fix87
  • 18 small tap targets

    18 of 59 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_CONNECTION_RESET”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 378 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 378 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SHOP”.

  • 17 calls to action

    The homepage has 17 calls to action, for example “Shop all”, “shop” and “Shop All”.

  • 24 short forms

    24 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Microsoft Clarity.

Privacy and tracking

  • 11 trackers load before any consent

    11

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Criteo, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Klaviyo and 6 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (iubenda) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 36 cookies set on arrival

    36

    Opening the homepage sets 36 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 53 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 53 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: iubenda

    A consent management tool (iubenda) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rembeauty.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 10 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Tolstoy · Aimerce First Party Pixel · Elevar Conversion Tracking · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Postscript Sms Marketing · Yotpo Product Reviews · Microsoft Clarity · Test Sms · goaffpro.com · noibu.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Shopify

Company

Founded
2021
Headquarters
La Habra

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 17 issues on rembeauty.com, including 2 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25
rembeauty.com website review: scores and fixes