Website review, no card needed

renewalliance.com logo

renewalliance.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202630 issues · 68 checks

This review found 30 issues worth fixing on renewalliance.com, 9 of them high impact, across 68 checks. The most urgent: 9 buttons without a name. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.1 s2.1 sMay 23Oct 172.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20262.8 s
May 30, 20262.8 s
Jun 6, 20262.7 s
Jun 13, 20262.7 s
Jun 20, 20262.7 s
Jun 27, 20262.8 s
Jul 4, 20262.8 s
Jul 11, 20262.6 s
Jul 18, 20262.5 s
Jul 25, 20262.2 s
Aug 1, 20262.2 s
Aug 8, 20262.4 s
Aug 15, 20262.6 s
Aug 22, 20262.9 s
Aug 29, 20263.0 s
Sep 5, 20262.9 s
Sep 12, 20262.8 s
Sep 19, 20262.8 s
Sep 26, 20262.7 s
Oct 3, 20262.6 s
Oct 10, 20262.5 s
Oct 17, 20262.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
167 ms132 msMay 23Oct 17154 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026163 ms
May 30, 2026163 ms
Jun 6, 2026153 ms
Jun 13, 2026148 ms
Jun 20, 2026144 ms
Jun 27, 2026142 ms
Jul 4, 2026138 ms
Jul 11, 2026139 ms
Jul 18, 2026138 ms
Jul 25, 2026142 ms
Aug 1, 2026137 ms
Aug 8, 2026141 ms
Aug 15, 2026147 ms
Aug 22, 2026146 ms
Aug 29, 2026155 ms
Sep 5, 2026144 ms
Sep 12, 2026138 ms
Sep 19, 2026139 ms
Sep 26, 2026136 ms
Oct 3, 2026146 ms
Oct 10, 2026155 ms
Oct 17, 2026154 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of renewalliance.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. renewalliance.com at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. renewalliance.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  3. renewalliance.com at 2.2 s2.2 s
  4. renewalliance.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  5. renewalliance.com at 3.7 s3.7 s
  6. renewalliance.com at 4.5 s4.5 s
  7. renewalliance.com at 5.2 s5.2 s
  8. renewalliance.com at 6.0 s6.0 s

Speed

8 to fix69
  • Mobile performance score: 69

    69/100

    Your mobile performance score is 69. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    450 ms · 352 KiB

    About 352 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    780 KiB

    8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (780 KiB).

  • Improve image delivery

    350 ms · 397 KiB

    12 images could be 397 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Facebook, Klaviyo and Google/Doubleclick Ads and others), adding 1.4 MB and 395 ms of main-thread time.

  • Render-blocking requests

    350 ms

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 350 ms.

  • Facebook adds 289 ms

    289 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 289 ms of main-thread work and 290 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • manuscdn.com adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    manuscdn.com costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 852 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 8 long tasks on the main thread

    8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 248 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    31 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 31 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    16 KiB

    About 16 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 2.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 967 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

4 to fix62
  • Time to Interactive: 12.0 s

    12.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 12.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.2 s

    5.2 s

    Your largest element takes 5.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Fall Rejuvenation Special. Save 15 percent on all three-box…”.

  • Total Blocking Time: 445 ms

    445 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 445 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 7 images without width and height

    7 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 163 ms to 154 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Not enough real-visitor data yet

    Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

3 checks passed
  • Speed Index: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 3.1 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • First Contentful Paint: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 0.9 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.1 MB in 85 requests

    2.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.1 MB in 85 requests on a phone: scripts 1.1 MB (35), images 855 KiB (26) and fonts 131 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (137 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.61 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.61 g of CO₂e: 73.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8488
  • 9 buttons without a name

    9 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 33 text elements with low contrast

    33 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 9 tap targets too small

    9 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (4 elements)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (5 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Heading levels should only increase by one (1 element)

    Heading levels should only increase by one: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 7 form fields without a label

    7 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Table header text should not be empty (1 element)

    Table header text should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • <td> elements in a large <table> do not have table headers.

    <td> elements in a large <table> do not have table headers. (1 element).

1 checks passed
  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 10091
  • Title is long (66 characters)

    Your title is 66 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Official Taut® Collagen USA | Beautiful Skin Without The Guesswork”.

  • Only 0 internal links

    The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 158 characters

    Your meta description is 158 characters: “The Taut® 24-Day Skin Transformation Challenge helps women achieve visible skin results through one simple daily ritual…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Beautiful Skin Without the Guesswork”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.renewskinco.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.renewskinco.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix75
  • Most text only appears after JavaScript runs

    4%

    A phone browser shows 1,222 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 46. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.renewskinco.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 2 small tap targets

    2 of 8 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_HTTP2_PROTOCOL_ERROR”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,222 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,222 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SHOP FALL SPECIAL Save up to $48”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (6 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Umami.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Klaviyo (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 4 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at renewalliance.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify;Shopify Plus
Hosting
Netlify

Company

Headquarters
Everett

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 30 issues on renewalliance.com, including 12 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25