Website review, no card needed

rensa.nl logo

rensa.nl website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202649 issues · 87 checks

This review found 49 issues worth fixing on rensa.nl, 18 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.5 s1.8 sMay 9Oct 241.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.3 s
May 16, 20262.3 s
May 23, 20262.4 s
May 30, 20262.3 s
Jun 6, 20262.3 s
Jun 13, 20262.2 s
Jun 20, 20262.2 s
Jun 27, 20262.2 s
Jul 4, 20262.3 s
Jul 11, 20262.3 s
Jul 18, 20262.3 s
Jul 25, 20262.2 s
Aug 1, 20262.2 s
Aug 8, 20262.2 s
Aug 15, 20262.2 s
Aug 22, 20262.2 s
Aug 29, 20262.2 s
Sep 5, 20262.2 s
Sep 12, 20262.3 s
Sep 19, 20262.3 s
Sep 26, 20262.2 s
Oct 3, 20262.1 s
Oct 10, 20262.0 s
Oct 17, 20262.0 s
Oct 24, 20261.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
190 ms175 msMay 9Oct 24185 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026178 ms
May 16, 2026177 ms
May 23, 2026179 ms
May 30, 2026179 ms
Jun 6, 2026180 ms
Jun 13, 2026185 ms
Jun 20, 2026180 ms
Jun 27, 2026184 ms
Jul 4, 2026184 ms
Jul 11, 2026185 ms
Jul 18, 2026187 ms
Jul 25, 2026186 ms
Aug 1, 2026187 ms
Aug 8, 2026185 ms
Aug 15, 2026182 ms
Aug 22, 2026185 ms
Aug 29, 2026180 ms
Sep 5, 2026180 ms
Sep 12, 2026184 ms
Sep 19, 2026186 ms
Sep 26, 2026187 ms
Oct 3, 2026188 ms
Oct 10, 2026188 ms
Oct 17, 2026186 ms
Oct 24, 2026185 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of rensa.nl (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. rensa.nl at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. rensa.nl at 1.1 s1.1 s
  3. rensa.nl at 1.7 s1.7 s
  4. rensa.nl at 2.3 s2.3 s
  5. rensa.nl at 2.8 s2.8 s
  6. rensa.nl at 3.4 s3.4 s
  7. rensa.nl at 4.0 s4.0 s
  8. rensa.nl at 4.6 s4.6 s

Speed

10 to fix49
  • Improve image delivery

    2.5 s · 9.9 MB

    10 images could be 9.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.8 s · 1.2 MB

    19 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.2 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.8 s

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.8 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 49

    49/100

    Your mobile performance score is 49 (desktop: 49). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    750 ms · 180 KiB

    About 180 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    800 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 800 ms).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 600 KiB

    About 600 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Usercentrics CMP, Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Ads and others), adding 620 KiB and 532 ms of main-thread time.

  • Usercentrics CMP adds 301 ms

    301 ms

    Usercentrics CMP costs a phone 301 ms of main-thread work and 269 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 156 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    21 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 102 ms

    102 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 102 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.34

    0.34

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.34 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 10.0 s

    10.0 s

    Your largest element takes 10.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 22.1 s

    22.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 22.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 11.5 s

    11.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 11.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user INP: 203 ms

    203 ms

    Real visitors wait 203 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.192

    0.192

    The layout shifts by 0.192 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 218 ms

    218 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 218 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 11 images without width and height

    11 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 178 ms to 185 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 587 ms

    587 ms

    Real visitors wait 587 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 16% faster for real visitors

    -16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 12.5 MB in 116 requests

    12.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 12.5 MB in 116 requests on a phone: images 10.7 MB (36), scripts 1.2 MB (25) and fonts 319 KiB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 8.9 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    8.1 MB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Atag_1026.jpg at 8,059 px wide, shown at 225 px. Resized copies would save about 8.1 MB.

  • 7 images in older formats

    7 images (9.4 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 4 images below the first screen load straight away

    4 images further down the page (9.0 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 3.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.55 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.55 g of CO₂e: 426.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 7289
  • ARIA roles used must conform to valid values (1 element)

    ARIA roles used must conform to valid values: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • 7 images without alt text

    7 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Heading levels should only increase by one (1 element)

    Heading levels should only increase by one: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 5 links without text

    5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

1 checks passed
  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 8581
  • 53 links crawlers can't follow

    53 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 3 H1 headlines

    There are 3 <h1> headlines (“De duurzaamstegroothandel”, “Leveringen” and “Webselectie”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Meta description is long (176 characters)

    Your meta description is 176 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 51 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 51 pages on rensa.nl and 7 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Title: 54 characters

    Your title is a healthy 54 characters: “De groothandel voor cv-ketel, warmtepomp en PV | Rensa”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://rensa.nl/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://rensa.nl/sitemapindex.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (625 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix60
  • 1 linked page is broken

    Your homepage links to /%7B%7Bpage.url%7D%7D, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.

  • 11 pages without a meta description

    /veelgestelde-vragen, /help, /feedback, /nieuws/onderhoudscontracten-van-bijzaak-naar-serieus-specialisme, /ketelpakketweken and /nieuws/nieuwe-generatie-ducoflex-fast-flexible-future-proof and 5 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /feedback, whose canonical is /Feedback. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 8 pages without an H1

    /nieuws/onderhoudscontracten-van-bijzaak-naar-serieus-specialisme, /ketelpakketweken, /nieuws/nieuwe-generatie-ducoflex-fast-flexible-future-proof, /nieuws/vsh-powerpress-nu-ook-in-xl-maten-beschikbaar, /nieuws/warmte-waar-en-wanneer-je-het-nodig-hebt and /nieuws/albrand-vloerverwarmingspakket and 2 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 37 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 8877
  • Scrolls sideways on phones

    On a 390 px-wide phone the page scrolls sideways, a sign that something is wider than the screen.

  • 4 small tap targets

    4 of 15 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 401 (Unauthorized)”.

  • 2 distorted images

    2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 534 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 534 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Neem contact op met een Servicebalie”.

  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Neem contact op met een Servicebalie” and “Contact”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Usercentrics) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 9 cookies set on arrival

    9

    Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 12 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Usercentrics

    A consent management tool (Usercentrics) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rensa.nl, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Angular
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Azure

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 49 issues on rensa.nl, including 20 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25