Website review, no card needed
rensa.nl website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202649 issues · 87 checks
This review found 49 issues worth fixing on rensa.nl, 18 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
67DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 178 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 177 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 179 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 182 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 185 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
2.5 s · 9.9 MB10 images could be 9.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.8 s · 1.2 MB19 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.2 MB).
Render-blocking requests
1.8 s3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.8 s.
Mobile performance score: 49
49/100Your mobile performance score is 49 (desktop: 49). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Reduce unused CSS
750 ms · 180 KiBAbout 180 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
800 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 800 ms).
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 600 KiBAbout 600 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
6 third-party services on the page
6 third-party services load with your homepage (Usercentrics CMP, Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Ads and others), adding 620 KiB and 532 ms of main-thread time.
Usercentrics CMP adds 301 ms
301 msUsercentrics CMP costs a phone 301 ms of main-thread work and 269 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.4 s
A phone's processor spends 2.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
7 long tasks on the main thread
7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 156 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
21 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 102 ms
102 msYour server sent the HTML in 102 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.34
0.34For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.34 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 10.0 s
10.0 sYour largest element takes 10.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 22.1 s
22.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 22.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 11.5 s
11.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user INP: 203 ms
203 msReal visitors wait 203 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.192
0.192The layout shifts by 0.192 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s
2.6 sThe first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 218 ms
218 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 218 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
11 images without width and height
11 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 178 ms to 185 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors wait 1.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 0.9 s
0.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 587 ms
587 msReal visitors wait 587 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 16% faster for real visitors
-16%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 12.5 MB in 116 requests
12.5 MBYour homepage downloads 12.5 MB in 116 requests on a phone: images 10.7 MB (36), scripts 1.2 MB (25) and fonts 319 KiB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 8.9 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
3 images far larger than shown
8.1 MB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Atag_1026.jpg at 8,059 px wide, shown at 225 px. Resized copies would save about 8.1 MB.
7 images in older formats
7 images (9.4 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
4 images below the first screen load straight away
4 images further down the page (9.0 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 3.6 g of CO₂ per visit
3.55 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.55 g of CO₂e: 426.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
ARIA roles used must conform to valid values (1 element)
ARIA roles used must conform to valid values: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
7 images without alt text
7 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Heading levels should only increase by one (1 element)
Heading levels should only increase by one: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
5 links without text
5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 checks passed
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
53 links crawlers can't follow
53 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
3 H1 headlines
There are 3 <h1> headlines (“De duurzaamstegroothandel”, “Leveringen” and “Webselectie”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Meta description is long (176 characters)
Your meta description is 176 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
51 internal links, 7 external
The homepage links to 51 pages on rensa.nl and 7 external pages.
4 checks passed
Title: 54 characters
Your title is a healthy 54 characters: “De groothandel voor cv-ketel, warmtepomp en PV | Rensa”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://rensa.nl/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://rensa.nl/sitemapindex.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (625 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page is broken
Your homepage links to /%7B%7Bpage.url%7D%7D, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.
11 pages without a meta description
/veelgestelde-vragen, /help, /feedback, /nieuws/onderhoudscontracten-van-bijzaak-naar-serieus-specialisme, /ketelpakketweken and /nieuws/nieuwe-generatie-ducoflex-fast-flexible-future-proof and 5 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /feedback, whose canonical is /Feedback. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
8 pages without an H1
/nieuws/onderhoudscontracten-van-bijzaak-naar-serieus-specialisme, /ketelpakketweken, /nieuws/nieuwe-generatie-ducoflex-fast-flexible-future-proof, /nieuws/vsh-powerpress-nu-ook-in-xl-maten-beschikbaar, /nieuws/warmte-waar-en-wanneer-je-het-nodig-hebt and /nieuws/albrand-vloerverwarmingspakket and 2 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 37 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Scrolls sideways on phones
On a 390 px-wide phone the page scrolls sideways, a sign that something is wider than the screen.
4 small tap targets
4 of 15 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 401 (Unauthorized)”.
2 distorted images
2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
1 low-resolution image
1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 534 words of copy
The homepage carries about 534 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Neem contact op met een Servicebalie”.
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Neem contact op met een Servicebalie” and “Contact”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Usercentrics) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
9 cookies set on arrival
9Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
12 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Usercentrics
A consent management tool (Usercentrics) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rensa.nl, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Angular
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Azure
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 49 issues on rensa.nl, including 20 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.