Website review, no card needed

retepas.com logo

retepas.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202622 issues · 80 checks

This review found 22 issues worth fixing on retepas.com, 7 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.7 s1.5 sMay 2Oct 171.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.6 s
May 9, 20261.6 s
May 16, 20261.6 s
May 23, 20261.6 s
May 30, 20261.6 s
Jun 6, 20261.6 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.6 s
Jun 27, 20261.6 s
Jul 4, 20261.6 s
Jul 11, 20261.6 s
Jul 18, 20261.6 s
Jul 25, 20261.7 s
Aug 1, 20261.7 s
Aug 8, 20261.7 s
Aug 15, 20261.7 s
Aug 22, 20261.7 s
Aug 29, 20261.7 s
Sep 5, 20261.7 s
Sep 12, 20261.7 s
Sep 19, 20261.6 s
Sep 26, 20261.6 s
Oct 3, 20261.6 s
Oct 10, 20261.6 s
Oct 17, 20261.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
137 ms120 msMay 2Oct 17132 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026122 ms
May 9, 2026124 ms
May 16, 2026124 ms
May 23, 2026125 ms
May 30, 2026126 ms
Jun 6, 2026126 ms
Jun 13, 2026127 ms
Jun 20, 2026128 ms
Jun 27, 2026128 ms
Jul 4, 2026130 ms
Jul 11, 2026130 ms
Jul 18, 2026130 ms
Jul 25, 2026130 ms
Aug 1, 2026130 ms
Aug 8, 2026131 ms
Aug 15, 2026132 ms
Aug 22, 2026135 ms
Aug 29, 2026135 ms
Sep 5, 2026135 ms
Sep 12, 2026135 ms
Sep 19, 2026133 ms
Sep 26, 2026133 ms
Oct 3, 2026133 ms
Oct 10, 2026133 ms
Oct 17, 2026132 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of retepas.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. retepas.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. retepas.com at 1.0 s1.0 s
  3. retepas.com at 1.4 s1.4 s
  4. retepas.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  5. retepas.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  6. retepas.com at 2.9 s2.9 s
  7. retepas.com at 3.4 s3.4 s
  8. retepas.com at 3.9 s3.9 s

Speed

7 to fix68
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.8 s

    47 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.8 s.

  • 3,053 HTML elements

    The page has 3,053 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Mobile performance score: 68

    68/100

    Your mobile performance score is 68 (desktop: 94). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, iubenda and trustindex.io and others), adding 1.4 MB and 461 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 324 ms

    324 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 324 ms of main-thread work and 357 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 741 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • rocketcdn.me adds 4 ms

    4 ms

    rocketcdn.me costs a phone 4 ms of main-thread work and 757 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 52 KiB

    14 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (52 KiB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    193 KiB

    About 193 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 162 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    26 KiB

    About 26 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Improve image delivery

    11 KiB

    1 image could be 11 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 94 but mobile only 68. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 297 ms

    297 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 297 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.3 s

    5.3 s

    Your largest element takes 5.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “referti di Rete PAS entrano nel Fascicolo Sanitario Elettro…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 8.3 s

    8.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 8.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 5.5 s

    5.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 122 ms to 132 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.6 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 139 ms

    139 ms

    Real visitors wait 139 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 565 ms

    565 ms

    Real visitors wait 565 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 176 ms

    176 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 176 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.075

    0.075

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.075, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

100
  • About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.41 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.41 g of CO₂e: 49.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

4 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.4 MB in 101 requests

    1.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.4 MB in 101 requests on a phone: images 658 KiB (22), scripts 499 KiB (9) and stylesheets 169 KiB (56). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8993
  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (3 elements)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (179 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 179 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • The skip-link target should exist and be focusable (1 element)

    The skip-link target should exist and be focusable: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 9 links without text

    9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 137 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 6 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

Google 100100
  • 253 internal links, 10 external

    The homepage links to 253 pages on retepas.com and 10 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 144 characters

    Your meta description is 144 characters: “I migliori professionisti sanitari di Firenze e provincia, con tempi di attesa minimi e tariffe accessibili. Rete PAS, …”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Cerchi un esame, una visita o un dottore?”.

  • Title: 34 characters

    Your title is a healthy 34 characters: “Rete PAS, ambulatori del no-profit”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://retepas.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://retepas.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,273 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://retepas.com/llms.txt (195 KiB, 429 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 1 page without an H1

    https://retepas.com/aree-sanitarie-e-diagnostiche/fisioterapia has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 101 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “LiveChatWidget is not defined”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    20 of 23 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix60
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,461 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,461 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 42 testimonial or review blocks, a star rating and 67 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (iubenda) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 9 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: iubenda

    A consent management tool (iubenda) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at retepas.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 22 issues on retepas.com, including 12 speed issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25