Website review, no card needed
revesderecho.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202645 issues · 82 checks
This review found 45 issues worth fixing on revesderecho.com, 17 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: mobile performance score: 33. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
66D- #98,339 of 107,353 reviewed websitesbeats 7%
- #57,987 of 60,666 online storesbeats 4%
- #53,325 of 55,348 Shopify storesbeats 3%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 285 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 280 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 273 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 273 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 275 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 279 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 290 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 287 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 286 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 283 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 269 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 268 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 263 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 271 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 282 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 289 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 302 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 305 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 309 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 312 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 313 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 312 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 304 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 294 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 289 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.1 s
2.3 s
3.4 s
4.6 s
5.7 s
6.9 s
8.0 s
9.2 s
Speed
Mobile performance score: 33
33/100Your mobile performance score is 33 (desktop: 37). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 8.8 s
A phone's processor spends 8.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
4,094 HTML elements
The page has 4,094 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Shopify, vitals.app and Clarity and others), adding 1,015 KiB and 778 ms of main-thread time.
Shopify adds 360 ms
360 msShopify costs a phone 360 ms of main-thread work and 540 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
340 ms · 65 KiBAbout 65 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 340 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
400 ms2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 400 ms.
Reduce unused JavaScript
354 KiBAbout 354 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 350 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
325 KiB10 images could be 325 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
147 KiB12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (147 KiB).
Legacy JavaScript
50 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 50 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Minify JavaScript
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 49 ms
49 msYour server sent the HTML in 49 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.4 s
4.4 sReal visitors wait 4.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 3.0 s
3.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 9.5 s
9.5 sYour largest element takes 9.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “cotton-dulces-banner-mob.gif”.
Time to Interactive: 19.7 s
19.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 19.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 11.9 s
11.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 812 ms
812 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 812 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 3.1 s
3.1 sThe first text or image appears after 3.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user INP: 348 ms
348 msReal visitors wait 348 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 45% slower for real visitors
+45%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 3.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.174
0.174The layout shifts by 0.174 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 285 ms to 289 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.10
0.10For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.10 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 782 ms
782 msReal visitors wait 782 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.3 MB in 397 requests
4.3 MBYour homepage downloads 4.3 MB in 397 requests on a phone: images 2.0 MB (188), scripts 1.1 MB (92) and other files 727 KiB (99). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image in older formats
1 image (216 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit
1.22 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.22 g of CO₂e: 146.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
11 tap targets too small
11 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
2 images without alt text
2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Heading levels should only increase by one (1 element)
Heading levels should only increase by one: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
5 links without text
5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (12 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 checks passed
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (28 characters)
Your title is only 28 characters: “Revesderecho | Tienda Online”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“” and “Nombre del producto”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
423 internal links, 8 external
The homepage links to 423 pages on revesderecho.com and 8 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 149 characters
Your meta description is 149 characters: “Full Market de Lanas y Manualidades - Cientos de productos de tus manualidades favoritas e innovadoras clases para dar …”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.revesderecho.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.revesderecho.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Some text only appears after JavaScript runs
47%The HTML your server sends has 1,369 of the 2,893 words a browser shows. AI crawlers don't run JavaScript, so they miss the rest.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.revesderecho.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 linked page is broken
Your homepage links to https://www.revesderecho.com/collections/new-in-ovillos, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.
2 pages share a title
https://www.revesderecho.com/collections/ovillos and https://www.revesderecho.com/collections/ovillos-lana-suave-tejer all use the title “Ovillos de Lana Suave para Tejer – Envíos a Todo Chile – Revesderecho”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
9 pages share a meta description
https://www.revesderecho.com/collections/ovillos-last-chance, https://www.revesderecho.com/collections/last-chance-ovillos, https://www.revesderecho.com/collections/last-chance-accesorios, https://www.revesderecho.com/collections/i-love-it, https://www.revesderecho.com/collections/new-in-accesorios and https://www.revesderecho.com/collections/new-in and 1 other use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.revesderecho.com/collections/ovillos-lana-suave-tejer, whose canonical is https://www.revesderecho.com/collections/ovillos. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
10 pages without an H1
https://www.revesderecho.com/collections/ovillos-last-chance, https://www.revesderecho.com/collections/last-chance-ovillos, https://www.revesderecho.com/collections/last-chance-accesorios, https://www.revesderecho.com/collections/i-love-it, https://www.revesderecho.com/collections/new-in-accesorios and https://www.revesderecho.com/collections/new-in and 4 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 121 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Every page has a meta description
All 10 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 10 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
59 small tap targets
59 of 132 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 403 ()”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 2,893 words of copy
The homepage carries about 2,893 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
4 short forms
4 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Microsoft Clarity.
Privacy and tracking
8 trackers load before any consent
8Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
19 cookies set on arrival
19Opening the homepage sets 19 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
39 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 39 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at revesderecho.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 45 issues on revesderecho.com, including 22 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.