Website review, no card needed

rexel.nl logo

rexel.nl website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202643 issues · 90 checks

This review found 43 issues worth fixing on rexel.nl, 14 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.1 s1.6 sMay 9Oct 241.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.8 s
May 16, 20261.8 s
May 23, 20261.9 s
May 30, 20261.9 s
Jun 6, 20262.0 s
Jun 13, 20262.0 s
Jun 20, 20262.0 s
Jun 27, 20262.0 s
Jul 4, 20261.9 s
Jul 11, 20261.9 s
Jul 18, 20261.9 s
Jul 25, 20261.9 s
Aug 1, 20261.8 s
Aug 8, 20261.7 s
Aug 15, 20261.7 s
Aug 22, 20261.7 s
Aug 29, 20261.8 s
Sep 5, 20261.9 s
Sep 12, 20261.9 s
Sep 19, 20262.0 s
Sep 26, 20262.1 s
Oct 3, 20262.0 s
Oct 10, 20262.0 s
Oct 17, 20261.9 s
Oct 24, 20261.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
295 ms154 msMay 9Oct 24187 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026279 ms
May 16, 2026271 ms
May 23, 2026265 ms
May 30, 2026271 ms
Jun 6, 2026270 ms
Jun 13, 2026270 ms
Jun 20, 2026262 ms
Jun 27, 2026239 ms
Jul 4, 2026220 ms
Jul 11, 2026203 ms
Jul 18, 2026187 ms
Jul 25, 2026181 ms
Aug 1, 2026177 ms
Aug 8, 2026170 ms
Aug 15, 2026172 ms
Aug 22, 2026179 ms
Aug 29, 2026180 ms
Sep 5, 2026186 ms
Sep 12, 2026196 ms
Sep 19, 2026196 ms
Sep 26, 2026198 ms
Oct 3, 2026197 ms
Oct 10, 2026189 ms
Oct 17, 2026188 ms
Oct 24, 2026187 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of rexel.nl (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. rexel.nl at 1.1 s1.1 s
  2. rexel.nl at 2.3 s2.3 s
  3. rexel.nl at 3.4 s3.4 s
  4. rexel.nl at 4.6 s4.6 s
  5. rexel.nl at 5.7 s5.7 s
  6. rexel.nl at 6.9 s6.9 s
  7. rexel.nl at 8.0 s8.0 s
  8. rexel.nl at 9.2 s9.2 s

Speed

13 to fix41
  • Render-blocking requests

    5.5 s

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 5.5 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.5 s · 1.5 MB

    68 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.5 MB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.0 s · 368 KiB

    About 368 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 41

    41/100

    Your mobile performance score is 41 (desktop: 50). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 5.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    600 ms · 3.0 MB

    About 3.0 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    650 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 650 ms).

  • 19 long tasks on the main thread

    19 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 565 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    367 KiB

    9 images could be 367 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Optanon and Unpkg and others), adding 2.3 MB and 109 ms of main-thread time.

  • 2,316 HTML elements

    The page has 2,316 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • rexel.com adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    rexel.com costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 1.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Fonts adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    Google Fonts costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 701 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify JavaScript

    173 KiB

    173 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 9 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 9 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 104 ms

    104 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 104 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 19.9 s

    19.9 s

    Your largest element takes 19.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Rexel en zijn digitale partners gebruiken cookies en vergel…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 29.7 s

    29.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 29.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 7.1 s

    7.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 7.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.4 s

    9.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 608 ms

    608 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 608 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 8 images without width and height

    8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 138 ms

    138 ms

    Real visitors wait 138 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 32% faster for real visitors

    -32%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 279 ms to 187 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.017

    0.017

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.017, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix53
  • Page weight: 5.2 MB in 265 requests

    5.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.2 MB in 265 requests on a phone: other files 1.7 MB (183), images 1.2 MB (46) and fonts 972 KiB (13). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 9 images below the first screen load straight away

    9 images further down the page (502 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    88 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 26-05-13-Word-Klant-hero-1200x960 at 1,200 px wide, shown at 352 px. Resized copies would save about 88 KiB.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (68 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.47 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.47 g of CO₂e: 176.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 9793
  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (16 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 16 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 69 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 9282
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 3 H1 headlines

    There are 3 <h1> headlines (“Onze voordelen”, “Keuzekaart e-mobility” and “Keuzehulp WCD”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 14 links crawlers can't follow

    14 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 258 internal links, 12 external

    The homepage links to 258 pages on rexel.nl and 12 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 155 characters

    Your meta description is 155 characters: “Rexel is dé elektrotechnische groothandel van Nederland met 450.000 elektrotechnische producten voor de woningbouw, uti…”.

  • Title: 50 characters

    Your title is a healthy 50 characters: “Homepagina | Rexel | Elektrotechnische groothandel”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.rexel.nl/nln/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.rexel.nl/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (936 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix93
  • 11 pages share a meta description

    https://www.rexel.nl/nln/Rexel/Duurzame-keuze/E-mobility/c/0013.0020.0000, https://www.rexel.nl/nln/Rexel/Duurzame-keuze/Zonne-energie-en-energieopslag/c/0013.0010.0000, https://www.rexel.nl/nln/Rexel/Duurzame-keuze/Verwarmen%2C-Koelen-en-Ventileren/c/0013.0030.0000, https://www.rexel.nl/nln/Rexel/Duurzame-keuze/Schakelmateriaal/c/0013.0140.0000, https://www.rexel.nl/nln/Rexel/Duurzame-keuze/Installatiekasten-en-verdeelinrichtingen/c/0013.0130.0000 and https://www.rexel.nl/nln/Rexel/Duurzame-keuze/Kabel/c/0013.0040.0000 and 5 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 pages without an H1

    https://www.rexel.nl/nln/store-finder, https://www.rexel.nl/nln/Rexel/Duurzame-keuze/c/0013.0000.0000, https://www.rexel.nl/nln/Rexel/Duurzame-keuze/E-mobility/c/0013.0020.0000, https://www.rexel.nl/nln/Rexel/Duurzame-keuze/Zonne-energie-en-energieopslag/c/0013.0010.0000, https://www.rexel.nl/nln/Rexel/Duurzame-keuze/Verwarmen%2C-Koelen-en-Ventileren/c/0013.0030.0000 and https://www.rexel.nl/nln/Rexel/Duurzame-keuze/Schakelmateriaal/c/0013.0140.0000 and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 191 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 7394
  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Synchronous `XMLHttpRequest` on the main thread is deprecated because of its detrimental effects to…”).

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    21 of 21 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix67
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 358 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 358 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Start de keuzehulp” and “Contact”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 3 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rexel.nl, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Angular
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Azure

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 43 issues on rexel.nl, including 21 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25