Website review, no card needed
rexel.nl website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202643 issues · 90 checks
This review found 43 issues worth fixing on rexel.nl, 14 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
79CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 279 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 271 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 265 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 271 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 270 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 270 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 262 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 239 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 220 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 189 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 187 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
5.5 s1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 5.5 s.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.5 s · 1.5 MB68 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.5 MB).
Reduce unused CSS
1.0 s · 368 KiBAbout 368 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.0 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 41
41/100Your mobile performance score is 41 (desktop: 50). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 5.6 s
A phone's processor spends 5.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Reduce unused JavaScript
600 ms · 3.0 MBAbout 3.0 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
650 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 650 ms).
19 long tasks on the main thread
19 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 565 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
367 KiB9 images could be 367 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Optanon and Unpkg and others), adding 2.3 MB and 109 ms of main-thread time.
2,316 HTML elements
The page has 2,316 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
rexel.com adds 0 ms
0 msrexel.com costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 1.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Fonts adds 0 ms
0 msGoogle Fonts costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 701 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Minify JavaScript
173 KiB173 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 9 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 9 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 104 ms
104 msYour server sent the HTML in 104 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 19.9 s
19.9 sYour largest element takes 19.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Rexel en zijn digitale partners gebruiken cookies en vergel…”.
Time to Interactive: 29.7 s
29.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 29.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 7.1 s
7.1 sThe first text or image appears after 7.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.4 s
9.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 608 ms
608 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 608 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
8 images without width and height
8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 138 ms
138 msReal visitors wait 138 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 32% faster for real visitors
-32%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 279 ms to 187 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.017
0.017The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.017, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.2 MB in 265 requests
5.2 MBYour homepage downloads 5.2 MB in 265 requests on a phone: other files 1.7 MB (183), images 1.2 MB (46) and fonts 972 KiB (13). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
9 images below the first screen load straight away
9 images further down the page (502 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
2 images far larger than shown
88 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 26-05-13-Word-Klant-hero-1200x960 at 1,200 px wide, shown at 352 px. Resized copies would save about 88 KiB.
1 image in older formats
1 image (68 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit
1.47 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.47 g of CO₂e: 176.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (16 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 16 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 text elements with low contrast
2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 69 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
42 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
3 H1 headlines
There are 3 <h1> headlines (“Onze voordelen”, “Keuzekaart e-mobility” and “Keuzehulp WCD”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
14 links crawlers can't follow
14 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
258 internal links, 12 external
The homepage links to 258 pages on rexel.nl and 12 external pages.
4 checks passed
Meta description: 155 characters
Your meta description is 155 characters: “Rexel is dé elektrotechnische groothandel van Nederland met 450.000 elektrotechnische producten voor de woningbouw, uti…”.
Title: 50 characters
Your title is a healthy 50 characters: “Homepagina | Rexel | Elektrotechnische groothandel”.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.rexel.nl/nln/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.rexel.nl/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (936 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
11 pages share a meta description
https://www.rexel.nl/nln/Rexel/Duurzame-keuze/E-mobility/c/0013.0020.0000, https://www.rexel.nl/nln/Rexel/Duurzame-keuze/Zonne-energie-en-energieopslag/c/0013.0010.0000, https://www.rexel.nl/nln/Rexel/Duurzame-keuze/Verwarmen%2C-Koelen-en-Ventileren/c/0013.0030.0000, https://www.rexel.nl/nln/Rexel/Duurzame-keuze/Schakelmateriaal/c/0013.0140.0000, https://www.rexel.nl/nln/Rexel/Duurzame-keuze/Installatiekasten-en-verdeelinrichtingen/c/0013.0130.0000 and https://www.rexel.nl/nln/Rexel/Duurzame-keuze/Kabel/c/0013.0040.0000 and 5 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
15 pages without an H1
https://www.rexel.nl/nln/store-finder, https://www.rexel.nl/nln/Rexel/Duurzame-keuze/c/0013.0000.0000, https://www.rexel.nl/nln/Rexel/Duurzame-keuze/E-mobility/c/0013.0020.0000, https://www.rexel.nl/nln/Rexel/Duurzame-keuze/Zonne-energie-en-energieopslag/c/0013.0010.0000, https://www.rexel.nl/nln/Rexel/Duurzame-keuze/Verwarmen%2C-Koelen-en-Ventileren/c/0013.0030.0000 and https://www.rexel.nl/nln/Rexel/Duurzame-keuze/Schakelmateriaal/c/0013.0140.0000 and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 191 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Synchronous `XMLHttpRequest` on the main thread is deprecated because of its detrimental effects to…”).
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
21 of 21 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 358 words of copy
The homepage carries about 358 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Start de keuzehulp” and “Contact”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
5 cookies set on arrival
5Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
3 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rexel.nl, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Angular
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Azure
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 43 issues on rexel.nl, including 21 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.