Website review, no card needed

ricago.com logo

ricago.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202637 issues · 91 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on ricago.com, 16 of them high impact, across 91 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.5 s1.8 sMay 2Oct 171.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.1 s
May 9, 20262.2 s
May 16, 20262.3 s
May 23, 20262.4 s
May 30, 20262.4 s
Jun 6, 20262.2 s
Jun 13, 20262.2 s
Jun 20, 20262.2 s
Jun 27, 20262.3 s
Jul 4, 20262.4 s
Jul 11, 20262.4 s
Jul 18, 20262.4 s
Jul 25, 20262.3 s
Aug 1, 20262.3 s
Aug 8, 20262.3 s
Aug 15, 20262.2 s
Aug 22, 20262.2 s
Aug 29, 20262.1 s
Sep 5, 20262.1 s
Sep 12, 20262.1 s
Sep 19, 20262.3 s
Sep 26, 20262.4 s
Oct 3, 20262.3 s
Oct 10, 20262.3 s
Oct 17, 20261.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
181 ms106 msMay 2Oct 17115 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026123 ms
May 9, 2026125 ms
May 16, 2026122 ms
May 23, 2026121 ms
May 30, 2026118 ms
Jun 6, 2026138 ms
Jun 13, 2026138 ms
Jun 20, 2026126 ms
Jun 27, 2026129 ms
Jul 4, 2026116 ms
Jul 11, 2026122 ms
Jul 18, 2026130 ms
Jul 25, 2026130 ms
Aug 1, 2026128 ms
Aug 8, 2026120 ms
Aug 15, 2026127 ms
Aug 22, 2026124 ms
Aug 29, 2026126 ms
Sep 5, 2026127 ms
Sep 12, 2026121 ms
Sep 19, 2026162 ms
Sep 26, 2026172 ms
Oct 3, 2026161 ms
Oct 10, 2026156 ms
Oct 17, 2026115 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of ricago.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. ricago.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  2. ricago.com at 5.6 s5.6 s
  3. ricago.com at 8.5 s8.5 s
  4. ricago.com at 11.3 s11.3 s
  5. ricago.com at 14.1 s14.1 s
  6. ricago.com at 16.9 s16.9 s
  7. ricago.com at 19.8 s19.8 s
  8. ricago.com at 22.6 s22.6 s

Speed

8 to fix24
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.1 s · 1.1 MB

    About 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.2 s

    15 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.2 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 24

    24/100

    Your mobile performance score is 24 (desktop: 59). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 5.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 2.3 MB and 1.4 s of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.5 MB

    4 images could be 1.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Google CDN adds 918 ms

    918 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 918 ms of main-thread work and 1.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 22 KiB

    About 22 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 156 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    10 KiB

    3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (10 KiB).

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 59 but mobile only 24. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 247 ms

    247 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 247 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 13.3 s

    13.3 s

    Your largest element takes 13.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Acts”. Most of its time is resource load duration (7.9 s).

  • Speed Index: 23.1 s

    23.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 23.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 31.1 s

    31.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 31.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.944

    0.944

    The layout shifts by 0.944 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 832 ms

    832 ms

    Real visitors wait 832 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 385 ms

    385 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 385 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 18 images without width and height

    18 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 123 ms to 115 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 111 ms

    111 ms

    Real visitors wait 111 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 7.4 MB in 132 requests

    7.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 7.4 MB in 132 requests on a phone: images 3.7 MB (47), scripts 2.3 MB (35) and other files 706 KiB (15). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 4 images over 500 KB

    4 images weigh 2.6 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 7 images far larger than shown

    1.1 MB

    7 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 189.jpg at 1,110 px wide, shown at 366 px. Resized copies would save about 1.1 MB.

  • 9 images in older formats

    9 images (2.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 11 images below the first screen load straight away

    11 images further down the page (2.4 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 2.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.10 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.10 g of CO₂e: 251.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 5985
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 7 text elements with low contrast

    7 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Links look like plain text

    1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (18 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 18 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 17 form fields without a label

    17 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h3 → h5, h2 → h4 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 42 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 27 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 35 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 27 passed and 8 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 7786
  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“WE HELP YOU SOLVE YOUR GREATEST COMPLIANCE CHALLE…” and “Contact Us”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Meta description is long (225 characters)

    Your meta description is 225 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 3 links crawlers can't follow

    3 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 3 links with vague text

    3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 58 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 58 pages on ricago.com and 5 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Title: 60 characters

    Your title is a healthy 60 characters: “Compliance Management Software India - GRC Platform | Ricago”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.ricago.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.ricago.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (996 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.ricago.com/llms.txt (2 KiB, 0 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 28 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9293
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “closePopupFunc is not defined”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    16 of 16 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix94
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 429 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 429 words of visible text.

7 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “REQUEST A DEMO”.

  • 6 calls to action

    The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “REQUEST A DEMO” and “Contact us”.

  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (6 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block and “more than 100 clients”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics and LinkedIn Insight.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 1 email link.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 12 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ricago.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 37 issues on ricago.com, including 17 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25