Website review, no card needed

riinternational.com logo

riinternational.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202627 issues · 71 checks

This review found 27 issues worth fixing on riinternational.com, 8 of them high impact, across 71 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.4 s2.0 sMay 9Oct 242.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.0 s
May 16, 20262.1 s
May 23, 20262.1 s
May 30, 20262.2 s
Jun 6, 20262.2 s
Jun 13, 20262.1 s
Jun 20, 20262.1 s
Jun 27, 20262.2 s
Jul 4, 20262.2 s
Jul 11, 20262.3 s
Jul 18, 20262.2 s
Jul 25, 20262.1 s
Aug 1, 20262.1 s
Aug 8, 20262.1 s
Aug 15, 20262.2 s
Aug 22, 20262.3 s
Aug 29, 20262.3 s
Sep 5, 20262.3 s
Sep 12, 20262.3 s
Sep 19, 20262.3 s
Sep 26, 20262.3 s
Oct 3, 20262.3 s
Oct 10, 20262.2 s
Oct 17, 20262.3 s
Oct 24, 20262.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
98 ms79 msMay 9Oct 2494 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202681 ms
May 16, 202687 ms
May 23, 202687 ms
May 30, 202688 ms
Jun 6, 202687 ms
Jun 13, 202686 ms
Jun 20, 202687 ms
Jun 27, 202688 ms
Jul 4, 202694 ms
Jul 11, 202693 ms
Jul 18, 202694 ms
Jul 25, 202696 ms
Aug 1, 202691 ms
Aug 8, 202687 ms
Aug 15, 202685 ms
Aug 22, 202683 ms
Aug 29, 202685 ms
Sep 5, 202686 ms
Sep 12, 202687 ms
Sep 19, 202687 ms
Sep 26, 202686 ms
Oct 3, 202687 ms
Oct 10, 202689 ms
Oct 17, 202692 ms
Oct 24, 202694 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of riinternational.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. riinternational.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. riinternational.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. riinternational.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. riinternational.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. riinternational.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. riinternational.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. riinternational.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. riinternational.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

2 to fix88
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.4 s

    38 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.4 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 88

    88/100

    Your mobile performance score is 88. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    140 ms · 237 KiB

    About 237 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 140 ms faster on a phone.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Accessibe Accessibility Overlay, hu-manity.co and wp.com and others), adding 691 KiB and 253 ms of main-thread time.

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 206 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    47 KiB

    2 images could be 47 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    7 KiB

    2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (7 KiB).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 544 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 33 ms

    33 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 33 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors wait 2.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 6.0 s

    6.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 7.5 s

    7.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 7.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 18 images without width and height

    18 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Your largest element takes 2.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Durable crisis infrastructure powered by access, peers, ali…”. Most of its time is element render delay (2.3 s).

  • Tap response (INP) got 11% slower for real visitors

    +11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 81 ms to 94 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 11% slower for real visitors

    +11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 103 ms

    103 ms

    Real visitors wait 103 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 81 ms

    81 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 81 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

100
  • About 0.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.29 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.29 g of CO₂e: 35.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.0 MB in 87 requests

    1.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.0 MB in 87 requests on a phone: scripts 582 KiB (21), fonts 248 KiB (9) and images 111 KiB (17). That is a lean page.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9082
  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • ARIA progressbar elements do not have accessible names.

    ARIA progressbar elements do not have accessible names. (4 elements).

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h3 → h6 and h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 17 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 9 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 12 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 9 passed and 3 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 10074
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (20 characters)

    Your title is only 20 characters: “Recovery Innovations”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (365 characters)

    Your meta description is 365 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • 50 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 50 pages on riinternational.com and 9 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://recoveryinnovations.org/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://recoveryinnovations.org/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://recoveryinnovations.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 7 pages without an H1

    https://recoveryinnovations.org/our-model, https://recoveryinnovations.org/impact, https://recoveryinnovations.org/locations, https://recoveryinnovations.org/leadership, https://recoveryinnovations.org/our-careers and https://recoveryinnovations.org/contact and 1 other have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 13 internal pages checked

    We fetched 13 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    12 pages of 13 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 12 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 12 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10092
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 429 ()”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix67
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 17 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • Only about 33 words

    The homepage has only about 33 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

4 checks passed
  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “In Crisis? Call 988”, “Contact” and “Call 988”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 3 phone links and 1 email link.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at riinternational.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Hosting
WordPress.com

Company

Employees
553

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 27 issues on riinternational.com, including 11 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25