Website review, no card needed

ringspann.de logo

ringspann.de website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202646 issues · 84 checks

This review found 46 issues worth fixing on ringspann.de, 16 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.2 s1.2 sMay 2Oct 171.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.6 s
May 9, 20262.9 s
May 16, 20262.7 s
May 23, 20262.7 s
May 30, 20262.8 s
Jun 6, 20262.8 s
Jun 13, 20263.0 s
Jun 20, 20262.9 s
Jun 27, 20263.0 s
Jul 4, 20263.0 s
Jul 11, 20263.0 s
Jul 18, 20263.0 s
Jul 25, 20262.9 s
Aug 1, 20263.0 s
Aug 8, 20262.8 s
Aug 15, 20262.5 s
Aug 22, 20262.2 s
Aug 29, 20261.4 s
Sep 5, 20261.4 s
Sep 12, 20261.5 s
Sep 19, 20261.4 s
Sep 26, 20261.5 s
Oct 3, 20261.8 s
Oct 10, 20261.8 s
Oct 17, 20261.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
174 ms122 msMay 2Oct 17151 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026145 ms
May 9, 2026147 ms
May 16, 2026152 ms
May 23, 2026154 ms
May 30, 2026160 ms
Jun 6, 2026159 ms
Jun 13, 2026168 ms
Jun 20, 2026156 ms
Jun 27, 2026145 ms
Jul 4, 2026142 ms
Jul 11, 2026128 ms
Jul 18, 2026145 ms
Jul 25, 2026155 ms
Aug 1, 2026157 ms
Aug 8, 2026153 ms
Aug 15, 2026137 ms
Aug 22, 2026137 ms
Aug 29, 2026131 ms
Sep 5, 2026131 ms
Sep 12, 2026143 ms
Sep 19, 2026145 ms
Sep 26, 2026150 ms
Oct 3, 2026154 ms
Oct 10, 2026156 ms
Oct 17, 2026151 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of ringspann.de (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. ringspann.de at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. ringspann.de at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. ringspann.de at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. ringspann.de at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. ringspann.de at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. ringspann.de at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. ringspann.de at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. ringspann.de at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

9 to fix82
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.4 s · 16.5 MB

    53 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (16.5 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.5 s

    17 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.5 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.0 s · 370 KiB

    About 370 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.0 s faster on a phone.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, ringspann.com and Google Analytics and others), adding 17.0 MB and 605 ms of main-thread time.

  • ringspann.com adds 105 ms

    105 ms

    ringspann.com costs a phone 105 ms of main-thread work and 16.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 82

    82/100

    Your mobile performance score is 82 (desktop: 95). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Improve image delivery

    985 KiB

    7 images could be 985 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 500 ms

    500 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 500 ms of main-thread work and 515 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify JavaScript

    340 ms · 62 KiB

    62 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 184 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 526 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 7 ms

    7 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 7 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 9.0 s

    9.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 9.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 883 ms

    883 ms

    Real visitors wait 883 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    Your largest element takes 3.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Verwendung von Cookies auf dieser Website Auf unserer Webse…”. Most of its time is element render delay (1.6 s).

  • Speed Index: 3.7 s

    3.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 3.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 11 images without width and height

    11 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 145 ms to 151 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 151 ms

    151 ms

    Real visitors wait 151 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.04

    0.04

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.04 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 32% faster for real visitors

    -32%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.6 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 176 ms

    176 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 176 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.02

    0.02

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.02, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix33
  • Page weight: 17.0 MB in 62 requests

    17.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 17.0 MB in 62 requests on a phone: media 14.5 MB (2), images 1.7 MB (32) and scripts 762 KiB (11). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    607 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 26-01-26-slider-1920x480-1769425998-7265.jpg at 8,000 px wide, shown at 585 px. Resized copies would save about 607 KiB.

  • 9 images in older formats

    9 images (1.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 6 images below the first screen load straight away

    6 images further down the page (607 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 4.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.83 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.83 g of CO₂e: 579.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

10 to fixGoogle 5683
  • Unlabelled dropdowns

    1 dropdown has no label.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • 23 tap targets too small

    23 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 17 text elements with low contrast

    17 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Links look like plain text

    14 links inside paragraphs rely on colour alone to stand out.

  • 2 images without alt text

    2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 28 form fields without a label

    28 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (2 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 37 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 37 passed and 9 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 7572
  • Title is long (70 characters)

    Your title is 70 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “RINGSPANN | Premium-Hersteller von Antriebskomponenten und Spannzeugen”.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (161 characters)

    Your meta description is 161 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (Organization) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: url is not an absolute URL ("https://www.ringspann.de/de")”.

  • 9 links crawlers can't follow

    9 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • Invalid hreflang

    Your hreflang tags are invalid, so Google may show the wrong language version.

  • One H1 headline

    Your <h1> is empty.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 120 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 120 pages on ringspann.de and 7 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.ringspann.de/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.ringspann.de/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,129 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.ringspann.de/de/branchen/uebersicht has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 7 pages slow to respond

    https://www.ringspann.de/de/produkte/freilaeufe, https://www.ringspann.de/de/produkte/industriekupplungen, https://www.ringspann.de/de/produkte/praezisions-spannzeuge, https://www.ringspann.de/de/branchen/uebersicht, https://www.ringspann.de/de/service and https://www.ringspann.de/de/service/downloads and 1 other took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 60 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 10087
  • 25 small tap targets

    25 of 40 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • A 10-field form

    Your longest form asks for 10 fields (4 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 645 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 645 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Matomo.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 3 phone links and 3 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 8 cookies set on arrival

    8

    Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 8 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ringspann.de, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Matomo

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 46 issues on ringspann.de, including 16 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25