Website review, no card needed

river-edge.org logo

river-edge.org website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202632 issues · 83 checks

This review found 32 issues worth fixing on river-edge.org, 11 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.9 s1.0 sMay 9Oct 241.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.2 s
May 16, 20261.2 s
May 23, 20261.3 s
May 30, 20261.4 s
Jun 6, 20261.4 s
Jun 13, 20261.4 s
Jun 20, 20261.6 s
Jun 27, 20261.7 s
Jul 4, 20261.8 s
Jul 11, 20261.7 s
Jul 18, 20261.5 s
Jul 25, 20261.3 s
Aug 1, 20261.3 s
Aug 8, 20261.4 s
Aug 15, 20261.4 s
Aug 22, 20261.4 s
Aug 29, 20261.3 s
Sep 5, 20261.2 s
Sep 12, 20261.3 s
Sep 19, 20261.1 s
Sep 26, 20261.1 s
Oct 3, 20261.2 s
Oct 10, 20261.3 s
Oct 17, 20261.4 s
Oct 24, 20261.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
107 ms82 msMay 30Oct 2499 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 30, 202699 ms
Jun 6, 2026102 ms
Jun 13, 2026104 ms
Jun 20, 2026104 ms
Jun 27, 202697 ms
Jul 4, 2026102 ms
Jul 11, 202699 ms
Jul 18, 202695 ms
Jul 25, 202695 ms
Aug 1, 202694 ms
Aug 8, 202695 ms
Aug 15, 202699 ms
Aug 22, 202699 ms
Aug 29, 202699 ms
Sep 5, 202693 ms
Sep 12, 202689 ms
Sep 19, 202687 ms
Sep 26, 202685 ms
Oct 3, 202691 ms
Oct 10, 202695 ms
Oct 17, 202698 ms
Oct 24, 202699 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of river-edge.org (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. river-edge.org at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. river-edge.org at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. river-edge.org at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. river-edge.org at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. river-edge.org at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. river-edge.org at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. river-edge.org at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. river-edge.org at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

5 to fix67
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    18.4 s · 6.5 MB

    41 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (6.5 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    17.3 s · 6.0 MB

    21 images could be 6.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 17.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 67

    67/100

    Your mobile performance score is 67. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Render-blocking requests

    950 ms

    7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 950 ms.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    390 ms · 390 KiB

    About 390 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 390 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Accessibe Accessibility Overlay and Google Maps and others), adding 879 KiB and 312 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 34 KiB

    About 34 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 103 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Document request latency

    27 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    5 KiB

    5 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 396 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 24 ms

    24 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 24 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 21.8 s

    21.8 s

    Your largest element takes 21.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 24.7 s

    24.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 24.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.4 s

    6.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.22

    0.22

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.22 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 22% slower for real visitors

    +22%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.2 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 11 images without width and height

    11 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 99 ms to 99 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 100 ms

    100 ms

    Real visitors wait 100 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 644 ms

    644 ms

    Real visitors wait 644 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.068

    0.068

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.068, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 48 ms

    48 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 48 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix25
  • Page weight: 7.4 MB in 70 requests

    7.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 7.4 MB in 70 requests on a phone: images 6.3 MB (32), scripts 866 KiB (20) and fonts 145 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images over 500 KB

    3 images weigh 5.3 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 6 images far larger than shown

    2.7 MB

    6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Tatnall sq.png at 1,584 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 2.7 MB.

  • 4 images in older formats

    4 images (5.7 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 6 images below the first screen load straight away

    6 images further down the page (256 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 2.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.10 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.10 g of CO₂e: 252.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9795
  • ARIA commands must have an accessible name (11 elements)

    ARIA commands must have an accessible name: 11 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 5 form fields without a label

    5 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 35 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 49 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 3 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9289
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (235 characters)

    Your meta description is 235 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 10 links with vague text

    10 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 73 internal links, 16 external

    The homepage links to 73 pages on river-edge.org and 16 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “We Make Life Better™”.

  • Title: 35 characters

    Your title is a healthy 35 characters: “Home - River Edge Behavioral Health”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://river-edge.org/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://river-edge.org/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://river-edge.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (885 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix88
  • 15 pages share a meta description

    https://river-edge.org/httpswwwriver-edgeorgriver-edge-foundationfoundation-events, https://river-edge.org/contact-us, https://river-edge.org/join-our-team, https://river-edge.org/about-our-team-culture, https://river-edge.org/holidays and https://river-edge.org/current-openings and 9 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://river-edge.org/mental-health/mental-health-court-jail-in-reach-and-co-responder-programs, whose canonical is https://river-edge.org/addiction-recovery/adult-outpatien-services. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://river-edge.org/contact-us has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 58 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 6 small tap targets

    6 of 18 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix81
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,205 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,205 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn More”.

  • 9 calls to action

    The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Join Our Team” and “Where to Start”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 7 cookies set on arrival

    7

    Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 14 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 14 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at river-edge.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Third Wave Digital CMS v7.0.1738
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
Hostwinds

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 32 issues on river-edge.org, including 13 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25