Website review, no card needed

robustintelligence.com logo

robustintelligence.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202631 issues · 99 checks

This review found 31 issues worth fixing on robustintelligence.com, 14 of them high impact, across 99 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.4 s2.1 sApr 25Oct 102.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 20262.3 s
May 2, 20262.3 s
May 9, 20262.3 s
May 16, 20262.3 s
May 23, 20262.6 s
May 30, 20262.6 s
Jun 6, 20262.6 s
Jun 13, 20262.7 s
Jun 20, 20262.7 s
Jun 27, 20262.7 s
Jul 4, 20262.8 s
Jul 11, 20262.8 s
Jul 18, 20262.9 s
Jul 25, 20263.0 s
Aug 1, 20263.1 s
Aug 8, 20263.2 s
Aug 15, 20263.2 s
Aug 22, 20263.2 s
Aug 29, 20263.1 s
Sep 5, 20262.9 s
Sep 12, 20262.8 s
Sep 19, 20262.7 s
Sep 26, 20262.6 s
Oct 3, 20262.4 s
Oct 10, 20262.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
450 ms319 msApr 25Oct 10334 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 25, 2026361 ms
May 2, 2026360 ms
May 9, 2026362 ms
May 16, 2026377 ms
May 23, 2026404 ms
May 30, 2026414 ms
Jun 6, 2026425 ms
Jun 13, 2026420 ms
Jun 20, 2026413 ms
Jun 27, 2026407 ms
Jul 4, 2026403 ms
Jul 11, 2026410 ms
Jul 18, 2026416 ms
Jul 25, 2026431 ms
Aug 1, 2026435 ms
Aug 8, 2026430 ms
Aug 15, 2026420 ms
Aug 22, 2026398 ms
Aug 29, 2026386 ms
Sep 5, 2026379 ms
Sep 12, 2026380 ms
Sep 19, 2026378 ms
Sep 26, 2026374 ms
Oct 3, 2026350 ms
Oct 10, 2026334 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of robustintelligence.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. robustintelligence.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. robustintelligence.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. robustintelligence.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. robustintelligence.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. robustintelligence.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. robustintelligence.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. robustintelligence.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. robustintelligence.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

robustintelligence.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

6 to fix59
  • Render-blocking requests

    3.2 s

    12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.2 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.6 s · 593 KiB

    31 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (593 KiB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.4 s · 241 KiB

    About 241 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • 3,734 HTML elements

    The page has 3,734 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Mobile performance score: 59

    59/100

    Your mobile performance score is 59 (desktop: 62). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    600 ms · 144 KiB

    About 144 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Optanon, Tealium and mPulse and others), adding 386 KiB and 159 ms of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 31 KiB

    1 image could be 31 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 25 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 25 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 82 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    5 KiB

    5 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 411 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 9.9 s

    9.9 s

    Your largest element takes 9.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.0 s

    5.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 10.0 s

    10.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 10.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.9 s

    6.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user INP: 324 ms

    324 ms

    Real visitors wait 324 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 361 ms to 334 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.038

    0.038

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.038, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 26 ms

    26 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 26 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

100
  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (32 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.33 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.33 g of CO₂e: 39.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.2 MB in 59 requests

    1.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.2 MB in 59 requests on a phone: scripts 676 KiB (32), stylesheets 249 KiB (3) and images 132 KiB (9). That is a lean page.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9995
  • Form elements should have a visible label (1 element)

    Form elements should have a visible label: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (10 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • The skip-link target should exist and be focusable (1 element)

    The skip-link target should exist and be focusable: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 7 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 4 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 10095
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 22 internal links, 15 external

    The homepage links to 22 pages on robustintelligence.com and 15 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 147 characters

    Your meta description is 147 characters: “Robust Intelligence was acquired by Cisco in October 2024 and has been foundational to the development of Cisco AI Defe…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Robust Intelligence is now part of Cisco”.

  • Title: 48 characters

    Your title is a healthy 48 characters: “Robust Intelligence Is Now Part of Cisco - Cisco”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.cisco.com/site/us/en/products/security/ai-defense/robust-intelligence-is-part-of-cisco/index.html.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.cisco.com/web/sitemap/www_cisco_com_ar_ae_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (404 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (1 KiB, 5 links, though it should open with a “# Title” line), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 1 page without a meta description

    /site/us/en/products/index.html has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 16 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 6 small tap targets

    6 of 14 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

9 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (cisco.com).

  • Valid certificate (22 days left)

    The certificate from IdenTrust · HydrantID Server CA O1 verifies for robustintelligence.com and is valid for another 22 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://robustintelligence.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 33 links work

    All 33 links checked from your homepage (18 internal, 15 external) answered without errors.

  • security.txt published

    A security.txt file tells researchers how to report a problem with your site.

Domain and trust

  • DNSSEC is off

    cisco.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

3 checks passed
  • Domain is 39 years old

    39 years

    cisco.com was registered in May 1987 through MarkMonitor Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Certificate issuers are restricted

    CAA records allow only identrust.com, ssl.com, letsencrypt.org and pki.goog to issue certificates for cisco.com, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.

  • Registered until May 2027

    cisco.com is registered until May 2027.

Content and conversion

4 to fix40
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 378 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 378 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “How to buy”, “Request a demo” and “Contact Us”.

Email authentication

2 to fix0
  • No DMARC policy

    robustintelligence.com has no DMARC record, so nothing tells receivers what to do with mail that fails SPF or DKIM. Gmail and Yahoo require DMARC from bulk senders.

  • No SPF record

    robustintelligence.com has no SPF record, so mail servers can't tell which servers may send email as you. Your mail lands in spam more often, and anyone can send mail pretending to be you.

  • No DKIM key on the usual selectors

    We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.

  • Domain receives no email

    robustintelligence.com has no MX record, so it receives no email. SPF -all and DMARC reject still matter: they stop others sending mail as you.

  • Email authentication score: 0/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

Privacy and tracking

  • 11 cookies set on arrival

    11

    Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 19 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 19 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

2 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 31 issues on robustintelligence.com, including 15 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25