Website review, no card needed
rosace.com.tn website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202645 issues · 85 checks
This review found 45 issues worth fixing on rosace.com.tn, 22 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
72CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 92 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 90 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 89 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 88 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 85 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 85 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
6.8 s5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 6.8 s.
Reduce unused CSS
4.8 s · 859 KiBAbout 859 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.8 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
3.5 s · 647 KiBAbout 647 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.5 s faster on a phone.
Minify CSS
1.1 s · 212 KiB212 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Improve image delivery
800 ms · 256 KiB7 images could be 256 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 800 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 56
56/100Your mobile performance score is 56 (desktop: 57). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
550 ms · 224 KiB5 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (224 KiB).
Minify JavaScript
450 ms · 80 KiB80 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Font display
300 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 300 ms).
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Facebook, Google Tag Manager and pushowl.com and others), adding 646 KiB and 312 ms of main-thread time.
5 long tasks on the main thread
5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 96 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
12 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.3 s
A phone's processor spends 1.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 483 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 120 ms
120 msYour server sent the HTML in 120 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 6.3 s
6.3 sReal visitors wait 6.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 5.9 s
5.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 5.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 9.2 s
9.2 sThe first text or image appears after 9.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 24.4 s
24.4 sYour largest element takes 24.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “slide1”.
Time to Interactive: 24.7 s
24.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 24.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.2 s
10.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
17 images without width and height
17 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 92 ms to 85 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 1.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 112 ms
112 msReal visitors wait 112 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.04
0.04For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.04 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 37 ms
37 msScripts block the page for only 37 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.4 MB in 66 requests
4.4 MBYour homepage downloads 4.4 MB in 66 requests on a phone: images 1.8 MB (20), scripts 1.3 MB (26) and stylesheets 934 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
17 images in older formats
17 images (1.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (129 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit
1.25 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.25 g of CO₂e: 150.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
5 buttons without a name
5 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
5 text elements with low contrast
5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
3 tap targets too small
3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (2 elements)
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Interactive controls must not be nested (2 elements)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
10 images without alt text
10 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
40 links without text
40 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings should not be empty (1 element)
Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h6 and h1 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
49 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 59 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 10 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
3 H1 headlines
There are 3 <h1> headlines (“⚜ 𝐐𝐮𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐋𝐞 𝐂𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐪𝐮𝐞 𝐑𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐨𝐧…”, “𝐄𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐒𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝐇𝐚𝐬 𝐈𝐭𝐬 𝐎𝐰𝐧 𝐒𝐭…” and “𝐀 𝐍𝐞𝐰 𝐒𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐨𝐧, 𝐀 𝐍𝐞𝐰 𝐒𝐭𝐲𝐥𝐞”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://rosace.com.tn/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
3 links crawlers can't follow
3 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
204 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 204 pages on rosace.com.tn and 5 external pages.
3 checks passed
Title: 59 characters
Your title is a healthy 59 characters: “ROSACE | Chaussures, sacs et accessoires | Tunisie/ Tunisia”.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://rosace.com.tn/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
10 pages share a title
/, https://rosace.com.tn/articles-parent/1, https://rosace.com.tn/best-seller, https://rosace.com.tn/articles/sneakers-et-baskets/6, https://rosace.com.tn/articles/derbies-et-moccasins/109 and https://rosace.com.tn/articles/derbies-et-moccasins/mocassins-et-ballerines/40 and 4 others all use the title “ROSACE | Chaussures, sacs et accessoires | Tunisie/ Tunisia”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
15 pages without a meta description
https://rosace.com.tn/articles-parent/1, https://rosace.com.tn/best-seller, https://rosace.com.tn/articles/sneakers-et-baskets/6, https://rosace.com.tn/articles/derbies-et-moccasins/109, https://rosace.com.tn/articles/derbies-et-moccasins/mocassins-et-ballerines/40 and https://rosace.com.tn/articles/derbies-et-moccasins/derbies/42 and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 103 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
27 of 29 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 121 words
The homepage has only about 121 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
2 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
7 cookies set on arrival
7Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
14 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 14 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rosace.com.tn, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2022.
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 45 issues on rosace.com.tn, including 18 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.