Website review, no card needed
roseinc.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 5 November 202645 issues · 89 checks
This review found 45 issues worth fixing on roseinc.com, 17 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 44.4 MB in 466 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
60D- #106,105 of 108,988 reviewed websitesbeats 2%
- #61,193 of 61,775 online storesbeats 1%
- #55,969 of 56,370 Shopify storesbeats 1%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 200 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 199 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 220 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 211 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 217 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 218 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 218 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 222 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 229 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 238 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 245 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 250 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 246 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 237 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 225 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 200 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.3 s
2.7 s
4.0 s
5.3 s
6.6 s
8.0 s
9.3 s
10.6 s
Speed
Main-thread work: 10.6 s
A phone's processor spends 10.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 14
14/100Your mobile performance score is 14. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8,548 HTML elements
The page has 8,548 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (cloudfront.net, Google CDN and Optanon and others), adding 1.2 MB and 1.7 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
750 ms · 803 KiBAbout 803 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
750 ms · 322 KiB37 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (322 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
700 ms11 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 700 ms.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 524 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
cloudfront.net adds 480 ms
480 mscloudfront.net costs a phone 480 ms of main-thread work and 99 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Klaviyo adds 167 ms
167 msKlaviyo costs a phone 167 ms of main-thread work and 334 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
okendo.io adds 123 ms
123 msokendo.io costs a phone 123 ms of main-thread work and 423 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
290 ms · 61 KiBAbout 61 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 290 ms faster on a phone.
Duplicated JavaScript
150 ms · 23 KiB23 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
50 ms · 61 KiB4 images could be 61 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 50 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
66 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 66 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify JavaScript
7 KiB7 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 40 ms
40 msYour server sent the HTML in 40 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.0 s
4.0 sReal visitors wait 4.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 4.0 s
4.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 16.5 s
16.5 sYour largest element takes 16.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 27.5 s
27.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 27.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 15.4 s
15.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 15.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.965
0.965The layout shifts by 0.965 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 896 ms
896 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 896 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 3.2 s
3.2 sThe first text or image appears after 3.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user INP: 277 ms
277 msReal visitors wait 277 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.17
0.17For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.17 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
17 images without width and height
17 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 200 ms to 200 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.3 s to 3.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
1 checks passed
Real-user TTFB: 397 ms
397 msReal visitors wait 397 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 44.4 MB in 466 requests
44.4 MBYour homepage downloads 44.4 MB in 466 requests on a phone: media 39.1 MB (17), scripts 2.5 MB (145) and images 1.4 MB (93). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images in older formats
2 images (202 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 12.6 g of CO₂ per visit
12.59 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 12.59 g of CO₂e: 1510.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
5 tap targets too small
5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
5 images without alt text
5 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (69 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 69 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
123 form fields without a label
123 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
9 links without text
9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings should not be empty (4 elements)
Headings should not be empty: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h5, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
1 checks passed
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 9 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Meta description is short (41 characters)
Your meta description is only 41 characters: “Shop high performance color and skincare.”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.roseinc.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at roseinc.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
7 links crawlers can't follow
7 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
165 internal links, 2 external
The homepage links to 165 pages on roseinc.com and 2 external pages.
5 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “SKIN YOU'LL FALL FOR. LOVE STARTS WTH YOUR GLOW.”.
Title: 42 characters
Your title is a healthy 42 characters: “Rose Inc - Clean beauty powered by science”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.roseinc.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.roseinc.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,935 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
https://www.roseinc.com/blogs/tutorials has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
8 pages without an H1
https://www.roseinc.com/collections/shop-all, https://www.roseinc.com/collections/best-sellers, https://www.roseinc.com/pages/shade-finder, https://www.roseinc.com/blogs/tutorials, https://www.roseinc.com/pages/about and https://www.roseinc.com/collections/body and 2 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 45 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
8 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 8 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
92 small tap targets
92 of 196 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Synchronous `XMLHttpRequest` on the main thread is deprecated because of its detrimental effects to…”).
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,346 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,346 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop now” and “Shop all”.
26 calls to action
The homepage has 26 calls to action, for example “Shop now”, “Shop all” and “Shop”.
20 short forms
20 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 22 testimonial or review blocks, a star rating and 3 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Klaviyo, Microsoft Clarity and TikTok Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
27 cookies set on arrival
27Opening the homepage sets 27 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
68 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 68 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at roseinc.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Hosting
- Shopify
Company
- Employees
- 180
- Headquarters
- Los Angeles
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 45 issues on roseinc.com, including 23 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.