Website review, no card needed

royalcoster.com logo

royalcoster.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202630 issues · 79 checks

This review found 30 issues worth fixing on royalcoster.com, 12 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.2 s2.2 sMay 2Oct 173.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.5 s
May 9, 20262.4 s
May 16, 20262.3 s
May 23, 20262.3 s
May 30, 20262.3 s
Jun 6, 20262.3 s
Jun 13, 20262.4 s
Jun 20, 20262.4 s
Jun 27, 20262.4 s
Jul 4, 20262.4 s
Jul 11, 20262.4 s
Jul 18, 20262.5 s
Jul 25, 20262.5 s
Aug 1, 20262.6 s
Aug 8, 20262.8 s
Aug 15, 20262.9 s
Aug 22, 20263.0 s
Aug 29, 20263.0 s
Sep 5, 20262.9 s
Sep 12, 20262.9 s
Sep 19, 20262.9 s
Sep 26, 20262.9 s
Oct 3, 20263.0 s
Oct 10, 20263.0 s
Oct 17, 20263.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
156 ms124 msMay 2Oct 17131 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026133 ms
May 9, 2026133 ms
May 16, 2026129 ms
May 23, 2026129 ms
May 30, 2026128 ms
Jun 6, 2026128 ms
Jun 13, 2026131 ms
Jun 20, 2026134 ms
Jun 27, 2026133 ms
Jul 4, 2026136 ms
Jul 11, 2026131 ms
Jul 18, 2026135 ms
Jul 25, 2026134 ms
Aug 1, 2026133 ms
Aug 8, 2026137 ms
Aug 15, 2026137 ms
Aug 22, 2026145 ms
Aug 29, 2026147 ms
Sep 5, 2026152 ms
Sep 12, 2026148 ms
Sep 19, 2026143 ms
Sep 26, 2026137 ms
Oct 3, 2026130 ms
Oct 10, 2026131 ms
Oct 17, 2026131 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of royalcoster.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. royalcoster.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  2. royalcoster.com at 2.2 s2.2 s
  3. royalcoster.com at 3.3 s3.3 s
  4. royalcoster.com at 4.4 s4.4 s
  5. royalcoster.com at 5.5 s5.5 s
  6. royalcoster.com at 6.6 s6.6 s
  7. royalcoster.com at 7.8 s7.8 s
  8. royalcoster.com at 8.9 s8.9 s

Speed

6 to fix46
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.5 s · 264 KiB

    About 264 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.2 s

    24 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.2 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 46

    46/100

    Your mobile performance score is 46 (desktop: 26). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot and Clarity and others), adding 698 KiB and 836 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 511 ms

    511 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 511 ms of main-thread work and 542 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    250 ms · 93 KiB

    23 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (93 KiB).

  • 12 long tasks on the main thread

    12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 236 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    211 KiB

    6 images could be 211 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Document request latency

    209 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 400 ms

    400 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 400 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.41

    0.41

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.41 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 9.8 s

    9.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 9.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 17.4 s

    17.4 s

    Your largest element takes 17.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 19.3 s

    19.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 19.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 11.4 s

    11.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 11.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 25% slower for real visitors

    +25%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 390 ms

    390 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 390 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 8 images without width and height

    8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 133 ms to 131 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 165 ms

    165 ms

    Real visitors wait 165 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.5 MB in 321 requests

    2.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.5 MB in 321 requests on a phone: scripts 1.1 MB (137), images 786 KiB (50) and HTML 316 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (145 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.71 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.71 g of CO₂e: 85.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 8791
  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h3 → h5 and h1 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 45 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 38 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 6 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9289
  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Royal 201 diamond” and “Pre-owned Rolex at Royal Coster Diamonds”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 64 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 64 pages on royalcoster.com and 8 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 157 characters

    Your meta description is 157 characters: “Discover handcrafted diamond jewelry at Royal Coster Diamonds Amsterdam. Explore certified GIA and IGI diamonds, iconic…”.

  • Title: 56 characters

    Your title is a healthy 56 characters: “Royal Coster Diamonds: Certified Diamonds & Fine Jewelry”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.royalcoster.com/en.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList and Organization.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.royalcoster.com/de/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.royalcoster.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (619 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://www.royalcoster.com/en/about/visit-our-boutique and https://www.royalcoster.com/en/contact have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages slow to respond

    https://www.royalcoster.com/en/collections/loose-diamonds and https://www.royalcoster.com/en/collections/all-jewelry-collection took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 49 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    40 of 49 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

100
  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 589 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 589 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact” and “Contact us”.

  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Get in touch” and “Contact us”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: a star rating, 1 trust badge and “over 1,000,000 customers”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity and Pinterest Tag (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 14 cookies set on arrival

    14

    Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 24 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 24 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at royalcoster.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 30 issues on royalcoster.com, including 18 speed issues and 4 SEO issues. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25