Website review, no card needed
rrkabel.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202647 issues · 90 checks
This review found 47 issues worth fixing on rrkabel.com, 20 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
72CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 7.3 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 7.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 7.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 7.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 6.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 230 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 243 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 242 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 242 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 214 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 147 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.1 s
2.2 s
3.3 s
4.4 s
5.6 s
6.7 s
7.8 s
8.9 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
6.5 s · 1.1 MBAbout 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.5 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.6 s7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.6 s.
Improve image delivery
2.2 s · 373 KiB8 images could be 373 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.2 s faster on a phone.
Google CDN adds 1.5 s
1.5 sGoogle CDN costs a phone 1.5 s of main-thread work and 1.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 35
35/100Your mobile performance score is 35. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 7.6 s
A phone's processor spends 7.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 2.4 MB and 2.2 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
780 ms · 96 KiBAbout 96 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 780 ms faster on a phone.
Document request latency
600 msThe HTML itself could arrive about 600 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Reduce initial server response time
595 msReduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 595 ms on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 291 ms
291 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 291 ms of main-thread work and 307 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
300 ms · 19 KiB5 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (19 KiB).
Font display
300 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 300 ms).
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 266 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
2,599 HTML elements
The page has 2,599 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Server response: 695 ms
695 msYour server takes 695 ms to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.
Minify JavaScript
30 ms · 6 KiB6 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Legacy JavaScript
18 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 18 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 5.0 s
5.0 sReal visitors wait 5.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 3.4 s
3.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors wait 2.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 16.7 s
16.7 sYour largest element takes 16.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “3-Thumbnail2”.
Time to Interactive: 20.9 s
20.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 20.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 11.7 s
11.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.5 s
1.5 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.5 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 3.0 s
3.0 sThe first text or image appears after 3.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
5 checks passed
Real-user INP: 152 ms
152 msReal visitors wait 152 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 38% faster for real visitors
-38%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 230 ms to 147 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 51% faster for real visitors
-51%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 7.3 s to 3.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.026
0.026The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.026, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.0 MB in 118 requests
4.0 MBYour homepage downloads 4.0 MB in 118 requests on a phone: scripts 2.3 MB (38), other files 723 KiB (18) and images 572 KiB (45). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
5 images far larger than shown
229 KiB5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example RRKL-Website_2-01-1.webp at 1,905 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 229 KiB.
About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit
1.12 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.12 g of CO₂e: 134.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
2 text elements with low contrast
2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Hidden but focusable
1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
21 form fields without a label
21 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h3 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 115 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
40 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 8 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
128 internal links, 22 external
The homepage links to 128 pages on rrkabel.com and 22 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 140 characters
Your meta description is 140 characters: “RR Kabel is a leading wire & cable manufacturer in India, offering premium electrical wires, cables, switches, fans, an…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “R R Kabel Limited”.
Title: 60 characters
Your title is a healthy 60 characters: “RR Kabel - India's No.1 exporter of Wires and Cables Company”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.rrkabel.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.rrkabel.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,513 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.rrkabel.com/llms.txt (8 KiB, 49 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
https://www.rrkabel.com/manufacturing-units is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
1 page without an H1
https://www.rrkabel.com/manufacturing-units has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 48 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
10 broken images
10 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.rrkabel.com/.
24 small tap targets
24 of 70 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
A 10-field form
Your longest form asks for 10 fields (8 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
Only about 243 words
The homepage has only about 243 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
3 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Investor Contact” and “Contact”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity and Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 12 phone links and 0 email links.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
8 cookies set on arrival
8Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
15 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 15 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rrkabel.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 47 issues on rrkabel.com, including 26 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.