Website review, no card needed
rtkl.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202636 issues · 100 checks
This review found 36 issues worth fixing on rtkl.com, 14 of them high impact, across 100 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
77CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 169 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 171 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 173 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 172 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 169 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.8 s
1.5 s
2.3 s
3.0 s
3.8 s
4.6 s
5.3 s
6.1 s
rtkl.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.4 s · 810 KiBAbout 810 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 66
66/100Your mobile performance score is 66 (desktop: 65). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
750 ms · 206 KiB7 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (206 KiB).
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and Clarity and others), adding 1.6 MB and 694 ms of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
450 ms · 95 KiB2 images could be 95 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Google CDN adds 374 ms
374 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 374 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.7 s
A phone's processor spends 2.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
2,461 HTML elements
The page has 2,461 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Render-blocking requests
150 ms1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 150 ms.
10 long tasks on the main thread
10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 100 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
16 KiBAbout 16 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Duplicated JavaScript
13 KiB13 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 305 ms
305 msYour server sent the HTML in 305 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user FCP: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.4 s
2.4 sReal visitors wait 2.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 8.4 s
8.4 sYour largest element takes 8.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 12.1 s
12.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 12.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 6.7 s
6.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.8 s
3.8 sReal visitors wait 3.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Total Blocking Time: 214 ms
214 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 214 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 169 ms to 169 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user INP: 170 ms
170 msReal visitors wait 170 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 27% faster for real visitors
-27%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.2 s to 3.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 1.2 s
1.2 sThe first text or image appears after 1.2 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.7 MB in 61 requests
2.7 MBYour homepage downloads 2.7 MB in 61 requests on a phone: scripts 1.8 MB (32), other files 360 KiB (12) and fonts 215 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
Festival_Aerial View_20251020_53.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit
0.75 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.75 g of CO₂e: 90.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Invalid ARIA attributes
1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
15 tap targets too small
15 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 8 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 4 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is long (173 characters)
Your meta description is 173 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
28 internal links, 4 external
The homepage links to 28 pages on rtkl.com and 4 external pages.
5 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Architecture”.
Title: 53 characters
Your title is a healthy 53 characters: “Architecture | Services | Arcadis | Service | Arcadis”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.arcadis.com/en/services/architecture-urbanism/architecture/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.arcadis.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
Some text only appears after JavaScript runs
59%The HTML your server sends has 675 of the 1,135 words a browser shows. AI crawlers don't run JavaScript, so they miss the rest.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
3 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 3 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example /link/2b810ebb73324b43a9798282455bccf6.aspx, whose canonical is /en/projects/north-america/canada/river-green-village. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
3 pages without an H1
/en/collections, /link/2b810ebb73324b43a9798282455bccf6.aspx and /link/955634f73c294812a7c8f41863b873d1.aspx have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
2 pages with very little text
/en/collections and /en/contact-us/contact-architecture-and-urbanism-service have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 26 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=343219449&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=23067865-8463-44cf-ab9c-1fcf161f5a89&bo=1&sid=297a85b0d0d411f1beadd1574a567a1e&vid=297aa250d0d411f18f7a27c41e2c306d&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=9.
3 small tap targets
3 of 13 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
1 broken link to your own pages
1 link from your homepage to your own site is broken, for example https://www.arcadis.com/en/about-us/ (network).
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
3 redirects before the homepage
Opening https://rtkl.com goes through 3 redirects before the homepage loads.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
6 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (arcadis.com).
Valid certificate (37 days left)
The certificate from DigiCert Inc · DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 verifies for rtkl.com and is valid for another 37 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://rtkl.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
arcadis.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
arcadis.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 30 years old
30 yearsarcadis.com was registered in Feb 1996 through MarkMonitor Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Feb 2029
arcadis.com is registered until Feb 2029.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,135 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,135 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
3 calls to action
The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Get in touch” and “Contact”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Email authentication
No DKIM key on the usual selectors
We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.
Domain receives no email
rtkl.com has no MX record, so it receives no email. SPF -all and DMARC reject still matter: they stop others sending mail as you.
Email authentication score: 90/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 -all”.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Ads and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
9 cookies set on arrival
9Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
18 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 18 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Azure
Company
- Founded
- 1946
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 36 issues on rtkl.com, including 16 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.