Website review, no card needed

rustica.com logo

rustica.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202650 issues · 95 checks

This review found 50 issues worth fixing on rustica.com, 20 of them high impact, across 95 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.8 s2.2 sMay 2Oct 172.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20263.6 s
May 9, 20263.5 s
May 16, 20263.5 s
May 23, 20263.5 s
May 30, 20263.6 s
Jun 6, 20263.5 s
Jun 13, 20263.4 s
Jun 20, 20263.3 s
Jun 27, 20262.9 s
Jul 4, 20262.6 s
Jul 11, 20262.6 s
Jul 18, 20262.5 s
Jul 25, 20262.6 s
Aug 1, 20262.6 s
Aug 8, 20262.6 s
Aug 15, 20262.6 s
Aug 22, 20262.5 s
Aug 29, 20262.4 s
Sep 5, 20262.4 s
Sep 12, 20262.5 s
Sep 19, 20262.6 s
Sep 26, 20262.8 s
Oct 3, 20262.9 s
Oct 10, 20262.8 s
Oct 17, 20262.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
194 ms149 msMay 2Oct 17189 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026168 ms
May 9, 2026162 ms
May 16, 2026157 ms
May 23, 2026154 ms
May 30, 2026154 ms
Jun 6, 2026161 ms
Jun 13, 2026162 ms
Jun 20, 2026166 ms
Jun 27, 2026171 ms
Jul 4, 2026164 ms
Jul 11, 2026165 ms
Jul 18, 2026160 ms
Jul 25, 2026163 ms
Aug 1, 2026169 ms
Aug 8, 2026169 ms
Aug 15, 2026171 ms
Aug 22, 2026170 ms
Aug 29, 2026169 ms
Sep 5, 2026170 ms
Sep 12, 2026172 ms
Sep 19, 2026179 ms
Sep 26, 2026183 ms
Oct 3, 2026183 ms
Oct 10, 2026183 ms
Oct 17, 2026189 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of rustica.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. rustica.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  2. rustica.com at 2.2 s2.2 s
  3. rustica.com at 3.4 s3.4 s
  4. rustica.com at 4.5 s4.5 s
  5. rustica.com at 5.6 s5.6 s
  6. rustica.com at 6.7 s6.7 s
  7. rustica.com at 7.8 s7.8 s
  8. rustica.com at 8.9 s8.9 s

Speed

13 to fix6
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.9 s · 1.3 MB

    About 1.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.8 s · 624 KiB

    14 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (624 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 6

    6/100

    Your mobile performance score is 6 (desktop: 35). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 8.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 8.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and Facebook and others), adding 2.5 MB and 1.8 s of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    650 ms · 662 KiB

    18 images could be 662 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 650 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 539 ms

    539 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 539 ms of main-thread work and 562 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google CDN adds 402 ms

    402 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 402 ms of main-thread work and 730 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 474 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 41 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 41 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Facebook adds 256 ms

    256 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 256 ms of main-thread work and 227 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • podium.com adds 199 ms

    199 ms

    podium.com costs a phone 199 ms of main-thread work and 516 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Klaviyo adds 175 ms

    175 ms

    Klaviyo costs a phone 175 ms of main-thread work and 324 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify JavaScript

    150 ms · 41 KiB

    41 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Render-blocking requests

    150 ms

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 150 ms.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    53 KiB

    About 53 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 35 but mobile only 6. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 15 ms

    15 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 15 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

13 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.9 s

    4.9 s

    Real visitors wait 4.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.61

    0.61

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.61 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 17.1 s

    17.1 s

    Your largest element takes 17.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Speed Index: 18.7 s

    18.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 18.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 31.5 s

    31.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 31.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 7.0 s

    7.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 7.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.8 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.567

    0.567

    The layout shifts by 0.567 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user INP: 271 ms

    271 ms

    Real visitors wait 271 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 38 images without width and height

    38 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 13% slower for real visitors

    +13%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 168 ms to 189 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

1 checks passed
  • Largest content (LCP) got 22% faster for real visitors

    -22%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.6 s to 2.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

3 to fix53
  • Page weight: 5.2 MB in 289 requests

    5.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.2 MB in 289 requests on a phone: scripts 3.1 MB (109), images 1.1 MB (93) and other files 529 KiB (57). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 13 images below the first screen load straight away

    13 images further down the page (555 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 5 images far larger than shown

    180 KiB

    5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example SHOP_AWNINGS_ROW_IMAGE_bppaz7.png at 1,300 px wide, shown at 356 px. Resized copies would save about 180 KiB.

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (270 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.49 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.49 g of CO₂e: 178.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8789
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Hidden but focusable

    35 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 3 images without alt text

    3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (21 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 21 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 48 links without text

    48 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

1 checks passed
  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9292
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 157 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 157 pages on rustica.com and 8 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 94 characters

    Your meta description is 94 characters: “USA made custom doors and hardware. Build, customize and order doors and door hardware online.”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Rustica Custom Doors, Hardware & Windows”.

  • Title: 40 characters

    Your title is a healthy 40 characters: “Rustica Custom Doors, Hardware & Windows”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://rustica.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://rustica.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (676 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://rustica.com/llms.txt (7 KiB, 37 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

4 to fix68
  • 1 page without a title

    https://rustica.com/wishlist has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://rustica.com/wishlist is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 3 pages without a meta description

    https://rustica.com/wishlist, https://rustica.com/newsletter and https://rustica.com/adoorable-doors have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    https://rustica.com/wishlist, https://rustica.com/newsletter and https://rustica.com/tributary-sliding-vanity-mirror have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 3 pages slow to respond

    https://rustica.com/instructions, https://rustica.com/shop-by-door-size and https://rustica.com/bypassing-barn-doors took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 108 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9678
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=5222142&Ver=2&mid=f11e1e2b-cc5a-4d8e-9b90-b8219a6cc887&bo=1&sid=0c396ca0cd3111f1ad1de5b594cc6cbd&vid=0c397770cd3111f1906c170fd409daca&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&lg=.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    20 of 21 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix81
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • About 274 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 274 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • 11 calls to action

    The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Sign in / Register Sign in”, “Sign Up For Ideas & Offers” and “Shop By Door Size →”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo and 5 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 9 trackers load before any consent

    9

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 13 cookies set on arrival

    13

    Opening the homepage sets 13 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 40 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 40 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rustica.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 50 issues on rustica.com, including 26 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25