Website review, no card needed
rvs.at website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202636 issues · 82 checks
This review found 36 issues worth fixing on rvs.at, 16 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
71CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 195 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 197 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 196 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 191 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 192 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 177 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.4 s
2.8 s
4.1 s
5.5 s
6.9 s
8.3 s
9.7 s
11.1 s
Speed
Improve image delivery
5.8 s · 1.5 MB4 images could be 1.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.8 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
5.3 s · 1.0 MBAbout 1.0 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.3 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.1 s3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.1 s.
Reduce unused CSS
1.2 s · 238 KiBAbout 238 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 41
41/100Your mobile performance score is 41. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
3,127 HTML elements
The page has 3,127 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 530 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
350 ms · 71 KiB6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (71 KiB).
Main-thread work: 3.7 s
A phone's processor spends 3.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
3 third-party services on the page
3 third-party services load with your homepage (Optanon, Adobe Tag Manager and r-itservices.at), adding 231 KiB and 115 ms of main-thread time.
Legacy JavaScript
27 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 27 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 507 ms
507 msYour server sent the HTML in 507 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 23.1 s
23.1 sYour largest element takes 23.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Traden mit kleinen Beträgen”.
Time to Interactive: 23.1 s
23.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 23.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 12.2 s
12.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 857 ms
857 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 857 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 2.9 s
2.9 sReal visitors wait 2.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 240 ms
240 msReal visitors wait 240 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 30% slower for real visitors
+30%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.6 s to 3.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
50 images without width and height
50 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
First Contentful Paint: 2.8 s
2.8 sThe first text or image appears after 2.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
4 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 10% faster for real visitors
-10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 195 ms to 177 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.7 MB in 57 requests
4.7 MBYour homepage downloads 4.7 MB in 57 requests on a phone: images 2.3 MB (22), scripts 1.7 MB (8) and fonts 312 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
buehne-sp4-wp.png weighs 624 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
6 images in older formats
6 images (817 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit
1.33 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.33 g of CO₂e: 159.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
6 tap targets too small
6 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 37 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
52 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 2 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Meta description is long (283 characters)
Your meta description is 283 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (BankOrCreditUnion) but with 1 problem, for example “BankOrCreditUnion: image is not an absolute URL ("https://www.raiffeisen.at/rvs/de/config/header-co…”.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
Open Graph partly set
Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.
231 internal links, 23 external
The homepage links to 231 pages on rvs.at and 23 external pages.
5 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Mein Raiffeisenverband Salzburg – die beste Bank für Privatkunden”.
Title: 41 characters
Your title is a healthy 41 characters: “Raiffeisenverband Salzburg | Privatkunden”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.raiffeisen.at/de/privatkunden.html.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.raiffeisen.at/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.raiffeisen.at/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,537 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
https://www.raiffeisen.at/rvs/de/privatkunden.html and https://www.raiffeisen.at/rvs/de.html all use the title “Raiffeisenverband Salzburg | Privatkunden”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
2 pages without a meta description
https://www.raiffeisen.at/rvs/de/meine-bank/raiffeisen-bankengruppe/raiffeisenbanken/self-service.html and https://www.raiffeisen.at/rvs/de/privatkunden/kredit-leasing/der-fairecredit.html have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
10 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 10 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.raiffeisen.at/rvs/de.html, whose canonical is https://www.raiffeisen.at/de/privatkunden.html. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
6 pages slow to respond
https://www.raiffeisen.at/rvs/de.html, https://www.raiffeisen.at/rvs/de/meine-bank/raiffeisen-bankengruppe/raiffeisenbanken/self-service.html, https://www.raiffeisen.at/rvs/de/privatkunden/konto.html, https://www.raiffeisen.at/rvs/de/privatkunden/konto/girokonto.html, https://www.raiffeisen.at/rvs/de/privatkunden/konto/studentenkonto.html and https://www.raiffeisen.at/rvs/de/privatkunden/konto/jugendkonto.html took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 168 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
45 of 46 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,632 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,632 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Start-Up-Initiative” and “Reserve aufbauen”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.
Opening hours shown
Your opening hours are on the homepage.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
5 cookies set on arrival
5Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
3 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
2 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rvs.at, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Hosting
- GRZ
Company
- Founded
- 1905
- Headquarters
- Salzburg
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 36 issues on rvs.at, including 20 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.