Website review, no card needed
saco.sa website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202639 issues · 79 checks
This review found 39 issues worth fixing on saco.sa, 15 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: mobile performance score: 30. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
62DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 167 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 166 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 247 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 249 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 248 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 246 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 249 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 253 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 254 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 260 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 269 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 274 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 278 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 277 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 270 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 265 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 255 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Mobile performance score: 30
30/100Your mobile performance score is 30. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 5.7 s
A phone's processor spends 5.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
3,347 HTML elements
The page has 3,347 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, TikTok and Facebook and others), adding 1.0 MB and 1.1 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
600 ms · 510 KiBAbout 510 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
750 ms3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 750 ms.
Google Tag Manager adds 577 ms
577 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 577 ms of main-thread work and 527 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
442 KiB21 images could be 442 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
18 long tasks on the main thread
18 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 342 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
249 KiB6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (249 KiB).
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 35 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 35 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 85 ms
85 msYour server sent the HTML in 85 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.52
0.52For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.52 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Time to Interactive: 21.3 s
21.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 21.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 7.8 s
7.8 sYour largest element takes 7.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Product Name | ساكو”.
Speed Index: 9.7 s
9.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 996 ms
996 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 996 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.294
0.294The layout shifts by 0.294 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Real-user LCP: 2.6 s
2.6 sReal visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 278 ms
278 msReal visitors wait 278 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 56% slower for real visitors
+56%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 167 ms to 255 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors wait 1.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
2 checks passed
Largest content (LCP) got 54% faster for real visitors
-54%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.5 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 1.2 s
1.2 sThe first text or image appears after 1.2 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.7 MB in 192 requests
3.7 MBYour homepage downloads 3.7 MB in 192 requests on a phone: scripts 1.7 MB (67), images 1.0 MB (76) and other files 501 KiB (39). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
app_4_..x-100_1.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit
1.03 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.03 g of CO₂e: 124.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
All page content should be contained by landmarks (6 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 69 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
36 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 39 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 36 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
87 internal links, 3 external
The homepage links to 87 pages on saco.sa and 3 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 103 characters
Your meta description is 103 characters: “تسوق الأدوات ومنتجات المنزل من ساكو. اكتشف أفضل العلامات التجارية مع توصيل سريع في جميع أنحاء السعودية.”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “تسوق الأدوات ومنتجات المنزل من ساكو. اكتشف أفضل العلامات التجارية مع توصيل سريع في جميع أنحاء السعودية.”.
Title: 32 characters
Your title is a healthy 32 characters: “أدوات المنزل ومواد البناء | ساكو”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.saco.sa/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.saco.sa/sitemap_ar.xml.
AI search readiness
robots.txt blocks 1 AI answer engine crawler
1 of 6Your robots.txt shuts out Perplexity (PerplexityBot). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.saco.sa/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Opted out of AI training for 3 crawlers
robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.
1 checks passed
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
https://www.saco.sa/wishlist is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
2 pages share a meta description
https://www.saco.sa/wishlist and https://www.saco.sa/branches use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
4 pages without an H1
https://www.saco.sa/wishlist, https://www.saco.sa/yalla, https://www.saco.sa/catalogs and https://www.saco.sa/branches have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
4 pages with very little text
https://www.saco.sa/yalla, https://www.saco.sa/catalogs, https://www.saco.sa/branches and https://www.saco.sa/autom-c-135064 have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 74 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=97190290&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=b62268b3-8216-44fd-81e1-ef4a9e576f86&bo=1&sid=96d12640d79a11f185efa34c83bbf9a2&vid=96d161f0d79a11f1a00555ac39ff6353&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=91.
1 third-party cookie
1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
84 of 89 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 135 words
The homepage has only about 135 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
2 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
9 trackers load before any consent
9Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Ads and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
25 cookies set on arrival
25Opening the homepage sets 25 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
24 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 24 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at saco.sa, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Enflow B.V.
Company
- Employees
- 2,400
- Founded
- 1984
- Headquarters
- Riyadh
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 39 issues on saco.sa, including 21 speed issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.