Website review, no card needed

saiehello.com logo

saiehello.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202645 issues · 81 checks

This review found 45 issues worth fixing on saiehello.com, 15 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.2 s2.7 sMay 16Oct 312.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20263.1 s
May 23, 20263.1 s
May 30, 20263.1 s
Jun 6, 20263.0 s
Jun 13, 20263.0 s
Jun 20, 20263.0 s
Jun 27, 20263.0 s
Jul 4, 20263.1 s
Jul 11, 20263.1 s
Jul 18, 20263.1 s
Jul 25, 20263.1 s
Aug 1, 20263.1 s
Aug 8, 20263.0 s
Aug 15, 20263.0 s
Aug 22, 20263.0 s
Aug 29, 20263.0 s
Sep 5, 20263.1 s
Sep 12, 20263.1 s
Sep 19, 20263.0 s
Sep 26, 20263.0 s
Oct 3, 20263.0 s
Oct 10, 20262.9 s
Oct 17, 20262.9 s
Oct 24, 20262.8 s
Oct 31, 20262.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
246 ms196 msMay 16Oct 31220 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026210 ms
May 23, 2026204 ms
May 30, 2026202 ms
Jun 6, 2026202 ms
Jun 13, 2026205 ms
Jun 20, 2026213 ms
Jun 27, 2026229 ms
Jul 4, 2026237 ms
Jul 11, 2026239 ms
Jul 18, 2026237 ms
Jul 25, 2026236 ms
Aug 1, 2026233 ms
Aug 8, 2026227 ms
Aug 15, 2026228 ms
Aug 22, 2026227 ms
Aug 29, 2026229 ms
Sep 5, 2026231 ms
Sep 12, 2026237 ms
Sep 19, 2026239 ms
Sep 26, 2026238 ms
Oct 3, 2026240 ms
Oct 10, 2026236 ms
Oct 17, 2026235 ms
Oct 24, 2026221 ms
Oct 31, 2026220 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of saiehello.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. saiehello.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. saiehello.com at 1.0 s1.0 s
  3. saiehello.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  4. saiehello.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  5. saiehello.com at 2.5 s2.5 s
  6. saiehello.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  7. saiehello.com at 3.5 s3.5 s
  8. saiehello.com at 4.0 s4.0 s

Speed

12 to fix57
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.5 s

    5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.5 s.

  • Main-thread work: 4.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 3,763 HTML elements

    The page has 3,763 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    900 ms · 1.0 MB

    40 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.0 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 870 KiB

    About 870 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 57

    57/100

    Your mobile performance score is 57. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Yotpo, Accessibe Accessibility Overlay and truevaultcdn.com and others), adding 2.5 MB and 682 ms of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    50 ms · 732 KiB

    15 images could be 732 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 50 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 50 KiB

    About 50 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Yotpo adds 126 ms

    126 ms

    Yotpo costs a phone 126 ms of main-thread work and 328 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Shopify adds 68 ms

    68 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 68 ms of main-thread work and 667 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Attentive adds 75 ms

    75 ms

    Attentive costs a phone 75 ms of main-thread work and 574 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 12 long tasks on the main thread

    12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 137 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    30 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 30 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify JavaScript

    7 KiB

    7 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 67 ms

    67 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 67 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.39

    0.39

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.39 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 10.3 s

    10.3 s

    Your largest element takes 10.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 29.9 s

    29.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 29.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.6 s

    9.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user INP: 225 ms

    225 ms

    Real visitors wait 225 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 353 ms

    353 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 353 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 20 images without width and height

    20 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 210 ms to 220 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 644 ms

    644 ms

    Real visitors wait 644 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 10% faster for real visitors

    -10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.1 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix25
  • Page weight: 7.4 MB in 401 requests

    7.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 7.4 MB in 401 requests on a phone: images 2.6 MB (40), scripts 2.4 MB (110) and fonts 1.0 MB (22). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    Allure_Best_of_Beauty_2025.webp weighs 1.0 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    1.0 MB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example Allure_Best_of_Beauty_2025.webp at 1,800 px wide, shown at 71 px. Resized copies would save about 1.0 MB.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (1.0 MB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 2.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.09 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.09 g of CO₂e: 250.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 10090
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 11 tap targets too small

    11 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (1 element)

    Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (8 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 18 form fields without a label

    18 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 7 links without text

    7 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 9 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 52 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 60 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 8 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9188
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (170 characters)

    Your meta description is 170 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 114 internal links, 0 external

    The homepage links to 114 pages on saiehello.com and 0 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Good to Glow”.

  • Title: 31 characters

    Your title is a healthy 31 characters: “Saie | Clean Makeup You'll Love”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://saiehello.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://saiehello.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (725 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://saiehello.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 45 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

1 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 27 small tap targets

    27 of 79 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix67
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 13 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • A 11-field form

    Your longest form asks for 11 fields (0 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 485 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 485 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “NEW! SuperSuede™ Eyeshadow | Shop Now” and “SHOP HOLIDAY”.

  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “NEW! SuperSuede™ Eyeshadow | Shop Now”, “Shop” and “SHOP HOLIDAY”.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 11 trackers load before any consent

    11

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Klaviyo and 6 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 56 cookies set on arrival

    56

    Opening the homepage sets 56 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 77 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 77 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at saiehello.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
Shopify
Hosting
Shopify

Company

Employees
290
Headquarters
New York

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 45 issues on saiehello.com, including 21 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25