Website review, no card needed

saladdays.co logo

saladdays.co website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202632 issues · 82 checks

This review found 32 issues worth fixing on saladdays.co, 12 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.1 s2.3 sMay 2Oct 173.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.5 s
May 9, 20262.5 s
May 16, 20262.6 s
May 23, 20262.8 s
May 30, 20263.0 s
Jun 6, 20263.2 s
Jun 13, 20263.3 s
Jun 20, 20263.2 s
Jun 27, 20263.2 s
Jul 4, 20263.2 s
Jul 11, 20263.2 s
Jul 18, 20263.2 s
Jul 25, 20263.3 s
Aug 1, 20263.5 s
Aug 8, 20263.7 s
Aug 15, 20263.9 s
Aug 22, 20263.9 s
Aug 29, 20263.8 s
Sep 5, 20263.7 s
Sep 12, 20263.6 s
Sep 19, 20263.5 s
Sep 26, 20263.5 s
Oct 3, 20263.4 s
Oct 10, 20263.4 s
Oct 17, 20263.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
258 ms206 msMay 2Oct 17251 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026216 ms
May 9, 2026212 ms
May 16, 2026213 ms
May 23, 2026213 ms
May 30, 2026214 ms
Jun 6, 2026221 ms
Jun 13, 2026227 ms
Jun 20, 2026229 ms
Jun 27, 2026237 ms
Jul 4, 2026239 ms
Jul 11, 2026236 ms
Jul 18, 2026237 ms
Jul 25, 2026232 ms
Aug 1, 2026230 ms
Aug 8, 2026231 ms
Aug 15, 2026233 ms
Aug 22, 2026236 ms
Aug 29, 2026242 ms
Sep 5, 2026240 ms
Sep 12, 2026245 ms
Sep 19, 2026243 ms
Sep 26, 2026245 ms
Oct 3, 2026248 ms
Oct 10, 2026252 ms
Oct 17, 2026251 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of saladdays.co (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. saladdays.co at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. saladdays.co at 1.0 s1.0 s
  3. saladdays.co at 1.5 s1.5 s
  4. saladdays.co at 2.0 s2.0 s
  5. saladdays.co at 2.5 s2.5 s
  6. saladdays.co at 3.0 s3.0 s
  7. saladdays.co at 3.5 s3.5 s
  8. saladdays.co at 4.0 s4.0 s

Speed

5 to fix55
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.0 s · 560 KiB

    About 560 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.5 s · 328 KiB

    4 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (328 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 55

    55/100

    Your mobile performance score is 55 (desktop: 55). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and WebEngage and others), adding 861 KiB and 556 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 291 ms

    291 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 291 ms of main-thread work and 476 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    200 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 200 ms.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 27 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 27 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 18 KiB

    About 18 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 9 long tasks on the main thread

    9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 136 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    25 KiB

    2 images could be 25 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.2 s of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 12 ms

    12 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 12 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 14.5 s

    14.5 s

    Your largest element takes 14.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “To enable healthy eating as a lifestyle choice”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 6.4 s

    6.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 6.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 14.8 s

    14.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 14.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 10.2 s

    10.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 251 ms

    251 ms

    Real visitors wait 251 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 35% slower for real visitors

    +35%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 3.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 18% slower for real visitors

    +18%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 216 ms to 251 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 141 ms

    141 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 141 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.005

    0.005

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.005, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix81
  • Page weight: 2.1 MB in 109 requests

    2.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.1 MB in 109 requests on a phone: scripts 1.5 MB (43), images 360 KiB (33) and other files 108 KiB (27). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    1757762618388-banner 3..png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.60 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.60 g of CO₂e: 72.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 8592
  • 20 text elements with low contrast

    20 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 7 tap targets too small

    7 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 33 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 33 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 37 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 33 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 10090
  • 4 H1 headlines

    There are 4 <h1> headlines (“Build your salad”, “To enable healthy eating” and “To enable healthy eating”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Meta description is long (171 characters)

    Your meta description is 171 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 42 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 42 pages on saladdays.co and 7 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Title: 64 characters

    Your title is a healthy 64 characters: “Salad Days Udyog Vihar - Fresh Healthy Food Delivery in Gurugram”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.saladdays.co/19525.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization, Restaurant and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.saladdays.co/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix65
  • robots.txt blocks 1 AI answer engine crawler

    1 of 6

    Your robots.txt shuts out ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.saladdays.co/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 3 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, Google-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.

2 checks passed
  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (263 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix58
  • 8 linked pages are broken

    Your homepage links to https://www.saladdays.co/product/matchamisu, https://www.saladdays.co/product/green-goddess-avocado-sandwich, https://www.saladdays.co/product/watermelon-chia-pressed-juice, https://www.saladdays.co/product/herb-pulled-chicken-bowl, https://www.saladdays.co/product/exotic-fruit-bowl and https://www.saladdays.co/product/roasted-chicken-salad and 2 others, which answer with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop them.

  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.saladdays.co/19525 and / all use the title “Salad Days Udyog Vihar - Fresh Healthy Food Delivery in Gurugram”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /, whose canonical is https://www.saladdays.co/19525. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    https://www.saladdays.co/privacy-policy, https://www.saladdays.co/19525/byos and https://www.saladdays.co/19525/menu have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://www.saladdays.co/19525/menu has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 12 internal pages checked

    We fetched 12 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Every page has a meta description

    All 4 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 4 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 8893
  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Location fetch error: Error: Location permission denied by user”.

  • Requests the geolocation permission on page load

    Requests the geolocation permission on page load.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    49 of 57 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix83
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Only about 225 words

    The homepage has only about 225 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

7 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Order”.

  • 9 calls to action

    The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “Order”, “Contact us on WhatsApp” and “Subscribe to our YouTube channel”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

  • Opening hours shown

    Your opening hours are on the homepage.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

  • LocalBusiness structured data

    Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 7 cookies set on arrival

    7

    Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 16 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 16 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at saladdays.co, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Vercel

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 32 issues on saladdays.co, including 15 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25