Website review, no card needed

saudiprojects.sa logo

saudiprojects.sa website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202641 issues · 65 checks

This review found 41 issues worth fixing on saudiprojects.sa, 12 of them high impact, across 65 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.4 s3.6 sMay 16Sep 194.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20264.6 s
May 23, 20264.8 s
May 30, 20265.0 s
Jun 6, 20265.0 s
Jun 13, 20265.0 s
Jun 20, 20264.6 s
Jun 27, 20264.4 s
Jul 4, 20263.8 s
Jul 11, 20263.8 s
Jul 18, 20264.0 s
Jul 25, 20263.8 s
Aug 1, 20264.2 s
Aug 8, 20264.4 s
Aug 22, 20264.9 s
Aug 29, 20265.2 s
Sep 5, 20265.2 s
Sep 19, 20264.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
221 ms140 msMay 16Oct 3178 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026210 ms
May 23, 2026212 ms
May 30, 2026206 ms
Jun 6, 2026212 ms
Jun 13, 2026206 ms
Jun 20, 2026186 ms
Jun 27, 2026174 ms
Jul 4, 2026153 ms
Jul 11, 2026159 ms
Jul 18, 2026159 ms
Jul 25, 2026159 ms
Aug 1, 2026159 ms
Aug 8, 2026149 ms
Aug 15, 2026154 ms
Aug 22, 2026161 ms
Aug 29, 2026170 ms
Oct 3, 2026178 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of saudiprojects.sa (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. saudiprojects.sa at 1.1 s1.1 s
  2. saudiprojects.sa at 2.1 s2.1 s
  3. saudiprojects.sa at 3.2 s3.2 s
  4. saudiprojects.sa at 4.3 s4.3 s
  5. saudiprojects.sa at 5.3 s5.3 s
  6. saudiprojects.sa at 6.4 s6.4 s
  7. saudiprojects.sa at 7.5 s7.5 s
  8. saudiprojects.sa at 8.5 s8.5 s

Speed

9 to fix64
  • Improve image delivery

    1.9 s · 9.4 MB

    44 images could be 9.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.4 s · 280 KiB

    About 280 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.6 s

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 1.6 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    12.3 MB

    47 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (12.3 MB).

  • Mobile performance score: 64

    64/100

    Your mobile performance score is 64. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Font display

    650 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 650 ms).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    310 ms · 45 KiB

    About 45 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 310 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 3.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • YouTube adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    YouTube costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 349 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 65 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 2 third-party services on the page

    2 third-party services load with your homepage (masakenapp.com and YouTube), adding 459 KiB and 1 ms of main-thread time.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix67
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 22.8 s

    22.8 s

    Your largest element takes 22.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Scroll down”.

  • Time to Interactive: 22.8 s

    22.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 22.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 13.2 s

    13.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 13.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 31 images without width and height

    31 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.6 s to 4.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Not enough real-visitor data yet

    Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

3 checks passed
  • Tap response (INP) got 18% faster for real visitors

    -18%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 210 ms to 178 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 15 ms

    15 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 15 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 16.6 MB in 98 requests

    16.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 16.6 MB in 98 requests on a phone: images 15.0 MB (53), scripts 753 KiB (13) and fonts 566 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    153 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example logo-BdGRHzot.png at 4,932 px wide, shown at 99 px. Resized copies would save about 153 KiB.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (192 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 4.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.71 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.71 g of CO₂e: 565.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8389
  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (8 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 9 tap targets too small

    9 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

1 checks passed
  • 31 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 34 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 31 passed and 3 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

10 to fixGoogle 8356
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (15 characters)

    Your title is only 15 characters: “مشاريع السعودية”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (463 characters)

    Your meta description is 463 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://saudiprojects.sa/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at saudiprojects.sa/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • Only 0 internal links

    The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

AI search readiness

1 to fix69
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://saudiprojects.sa/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 4 small tap targets

    4 of 12 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

6 to fix25
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 7 words

    The homepage has only about 7 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 1 other company contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 1 host run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at saudiprojects.sa, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Hosting
Ndc Cloud Arabian Internet & Communications Services Co.Ltd

Company

Founded
2011

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 41 issues on saudiprojects.sa, including 14 speed issues, 10 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25