Website review, no card needed
scanavini.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202630 issues · 97 checks
This review found 30 issues worth fixing on scanavini.com, 6 of them high impact, across 97 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
87BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 144 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 141 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 144 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 144 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 139 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.1 s · 5.6 MB43 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (5.6 MB).
Mobile performance score: 76
76/100Your mobile performance score is 76 (desktop: 97). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Improve image delivery
600 ms · 230 KiB4 images could be 230 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
3 third-party services on the page
3 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and scanavini.cl), adding 5.3 MB and 241 ms of main-thread time.
scanavini.cl adds 0 ms
0 msscanavini.cl costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 5.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused JavaScript
300 ms · 96 KiBAbout 96 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 3.0 s
A phone's processor spends 3.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 549 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 126 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 131 ms
131 msYour server sent the HTML in 131 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 5.3 s
5.3 sYour largest element takes 5.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “CERRADURA”.
Time to Interactive: 5.3 s
5.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 5.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
16 images without width and height
16 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Total Blocking Time: 211 ms
211 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 211 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-6%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 144 ms to 139 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.2 s to 1.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
9 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 138 ms
138 msReal visitors wait 138 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 0.9 s
0.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 609 ms
609 msReal visitors wait 609 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Speed Index: 3.3 s
3.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 3.3 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.
First Contentful Paint: 1.2 s
1.2 sThe first text or image appears after 1.2 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.6 MB in 46 requests
6.6 MBYour homepage downloads 6.6 MB in 46 requests on a phone: media 5.1 MB (6), images 1.0 MB (22) and fonts 266 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
46 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example bodegon.webp at 1,221 px wide, shown at 308 px. Resized copies would save about 46 KiB.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (108 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit
1.88 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.88 g of CO₂e: 225.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
3 text elements with low contrast
3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)
Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one main landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one main landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 49 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 4 failed. 6 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
4 H1 headlines
There are 4 <h1> headlines (“CERRADURA DE SOBREPONER”, “CERRADURA ACCESO COLONIAL” and “CERRADURA DIGITAL”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Meta description is long (172 characters)
Your meta description is 172 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (untyped) but with 1 problem, for example “ld+json block 1 is not valid JSON (Expected property name or '}' in JSON at position 8 (line 2 )”.
23 internal links, 18 external
The homepage links to 23 pages on scanavini.com and 18 external pages.
5 checks passed
Title: 55 characters
Your title is a healthy 55 characters: “Scanavini - Cerraduras protegiendo tu hogar por 75 años”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.scanavini.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.scanavini.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,056 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
/mantenimiento is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
2 pages without an H1
/nosotros and /contacto have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
9 internal pages checked
We fetched 9 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 9 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 9 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has a title
All 9 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
4 small tap targets
4 of 20 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
6 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (scanavini.com).
Valid certificate (37 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR1 verifies for scanavini.com and is valid for another 37 days.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://scanavini.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 23 links work
All 23 links checked from your homepage (10 internal, 13 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
scanavini.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
scanavini.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 28 years old
28 yearsscanavini.com was registered in Apr 1998 through Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a Registrar.eu. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Apr 2027
scanavini.com is registered until Apr 2027.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a map but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 791 words of copy
The homepage carries about 791 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 9 testimonial or review blocks, 16 customer or partner logos and 3 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 3 phone links and 0 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 100/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:afro.cl include:spf.sendinblue.com include:spf.brevo.com mx -all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “k2” and “mail”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
3 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- Framework
- Astro
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This free review found 30 issues on scanavini.com, including 11 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.