Website review, no card needed
scangroup.net website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202635 issues · 75 checks
This review found 35 issues worth fixing on scangroup.net, 12 of them high impact, across 75 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
76CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideOne score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
6.7 s · 754 KiBAbout 754 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.7 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
3.5 s · 959 KiB43 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (959 KiB).
Improve image delivery
1.1 s · 192 KiB4 images could be 192 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Minify JavaScript
1.1 s · 102 KiB102 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Mobile performance score: 55
55/100Your mobile performance score is 55 (desktop: 86). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 1.3 MB and 676 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 94 KiBAbout 94 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Google CDN adds 388 ms
388 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 388 ms of main-thread work and 733 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
450 ms2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 450 ms.
digitaloceanspaces.com adds 0 ms
0 msdigitaloceanspaces.com costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 351 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
8 long tasks on the main thread
8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 132 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 86 but mobile only 55. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.7 s
A phone's processor spends 1.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 987 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
First Contentful Paint: 11.2 s
11.2 sThe first text or image appears after 11.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 15.7 s
15.7 sYour largest element takes 15.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “When the Scan Group began in 1983, we led the way with trai…”.
Speed Index: 11.2 s
11.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 16.1 s
16.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 16.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
28 images without width and height
28 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Not enough real-visitor data yet
Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.
2 checks passed
Total Blocking Time: 109 ms
109 msScripts block the page for only 109 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.7 MB in 62 requests
2.7 MBYour homepage downloads 2.7 MB in 62 requests on a phone: scripts 1.3 MB (11), images 838 KiB (39) and other files 348 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
4 images below the first screen load straight away
4 images further down the page (350 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
1 image far larger than shown
44 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example LgPrinterSelfPromo-010.jpg at 1,379 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 44 KiB.
4 images in older formats
4 images (350 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit
0.75 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.75 g of CO₂e: 90.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
28 tap targets too small
28 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
15 text elements with low contrast
15 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (30 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 30 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 32 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is long (77 characters)
Your title is 77 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “The Scan Group, Inc. - Your full-service marketing and print management group”.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
65 internal links, 6 external
The homepage links to 65 pages on scangroup.net and 6 external pages.
4 checks passed
Meta description: 153 characters
Your meta description is 153 characters: “Leading marketing and print management group, headquartered in Wisconsin, who elevates you in achieving cost savings, s…”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.scangroup.net/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.scangroup.net/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.scangroup.net/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (748 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
16 pages share a title
/, https://www.scangroup.net/printing-services, https://www.scangroup.net/printing-services/finishing-mailing-services, https://www.scangroup.net/printing-services/offset-color-litho-printing, https://www.scangroup.net/printing-services/on-demand-print and https://www.scangroup.net/printing-services/variable-data-printing and 10 others all use the title “The Scan Group, Inc. - Your full-service marketing and print manageme…”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
15 pages share a meta description
https://www.scangroup.net/printing-services, https://www.scangroup.net/printing-services/finishing-mailing-services, https://www.scangroup.net/printing-services/offset-color-litho-printing, https://www.scangroup.net/printing-services/on-demand-print, https://www.scangroup.net/printing-services/variable-data-printing and https://www.scangroup.net/printing-services/wide-format-prints and 9 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 20 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
8 of 8 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 28 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 597 words of copy
The homepage carries about 597 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
5 calls to action
The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Contact Us” and “Download Brochure”.
1 short form
A short form (6 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics, Fathom and Matomo.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
6 cookies set on arrival
6Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
10 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at scangroup.net, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Matomo | Fathom
Hiring
- Hiring
- 8 open roles
- Teams
- Strategy & Planning (3), Media (2), Creative & Design (1), Human Resources (1)
- Job board
- greenhouse
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 35 issues on scangroup.net, including 15 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.