Website review, no card needed

scharffenberger.com logo

scharffenberger.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202625 issues · 60 checks

This review found 25 issues worth fixing on scharffenberger.com, 10 of them high impact, across 60 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Google's speed test didn't respond, so speed is not measured here; your full playbook measures it. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Site score

Not scored yet: Google's speed test didn't run in this review. Re-run the review to get a score.

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.8 s2.3 sMay 16Oct 314.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.9 s
May 23, 20262.8 s
May 30, 20262.7 s
Jun 6, 20262.9 s
Jun 13, 20263.0 s
Jun 20, 20263.3 s
Jun 27, 20263.5 s
Jul 4, 20263.6 s
Jul 11, 20263.8 s
Jul 18, 20263.8 s
Jul 25, 20263.9 s
Aug 1, 20264.1 s
Aug 8, 20264.2 s
Aug 15, 20264.4 s
Aug 22, 20264.6 s
Aug 29, 20264.7 s
Sep 5, 20264.9 s
Sep 12, 20265.0 s
Sep 19, 20265.2 s
Sep 26, 20265.3 s
Oct 3, 20265.3 s
Oct 10, 20265.4 s
Oct 17, 20265.2 s
Oct 24, 20264.7 s
Oct 31, 20264.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
574 ms391 msMay 16Oct 31448 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026502 ms
May 23, 2026498 ms
May 30, 2026489 ms
Jun 6, 2026521 ms
Jun 13, 2026540 ms
Jun 20, 2026544 ms
Jun 27, 2026553 ms
Jul 4, 2026528 ms
Jul 11, 2026496 ms
Jul 18, 2026453 ms
Jul 25, 2026413 ms
Aug 1, 2026413 ms
Aug 8, 2026412 ms
Aug 15, 2026417 ms
Aug 22, 2026427 ms
Aug 29, 2026430 ms
Sep 5, 2026439 ms
Sep 12, 2026443 ms
Sep 19, 2026437 ms
Sep 26, 2026433 ms
Oct 3, 2026420 ms
Oct 10, 2026428 ms
Oct 17, 2026437 ms
Oct 24, 2026439 ms
Oct 31, 2026448 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

No screenshot is available for this review.

Speed

Not measured in this review.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on your site (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.9 s

    3.9 s

    Real visitors wait 3.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 412 ms

    412 ms

    Real visitors wait 412 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.15

    0.15

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.15 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 59% slower for real visitors

    +59%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.9 s to 4.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

1 checks passed
  • Tap response (INP) got 11% faster for real visitors

    -11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 502 ms to 448 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 5.8 MB

    5.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.8 MB on a phone, 1.1 MB of it images (19%). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (102 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.64 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.64 g of CO₂e: 196.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fix90
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 11 text elements with low contrast

    11 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 9 tap targets too small

    9 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Users should be able to zoom and scale the text up to 500% (1 element)

    Users should be able to zoom and scale the text up to 500%: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 15 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 36 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 42 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 36 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

100
  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:title, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 45 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 45 pages on scharffenberger.com and 5 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 129 characters

    Your meta description is 129 characters: “Explore Scharffen Berger Chocolates at Harry & David. Shop rich, artisanal chocolates made from premium cacao beans. Or…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Scharffen Berger Chocolate Gifts”.

  • Title: 55 characters

    Your title is a healthy 55 characters: “Scharffen Berger Chocolate Gifts & Bars | Harry & David”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.harryanddavid.com/h/scharffen-berger.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.harryanddavid.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix70
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • Parts of the site are closed to 6 AI crawlers

    Your robots.txt lets ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User), Claude search (Claude-SearchBot), Claude (Claude-User), Perplexity (PerplexityBot) and Perplexity (Perplexity-User) read the homepage but closes other sections to them, so answers about those pages can't cite you.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.harryanddavid.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (332 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix50
  • 1 linked page is broken

    Your homepage links to https://www.harryanddavid.com/articles/food-drink/belgian-chocolate, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.

  • 8 pages without a title

    https://www.harryanddavid.com/h/scharffen-berger/all, https://www.harryanddavid.com/h/scharffen-berger/boxes, https://www.harryanddavid.com/h/scharffen-berger/best-sellers, https://www.harryanddavid.com/h/scharffen-berger/baking, https://www.harryanddavid.com/h/chocolates-sweets-candy/chocolate-boxes-bars and https://www.harryanddavid.com/h/chocolates-sweets-candy/simply-chocolate and 2 others have no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 8 pages without a meta description

    https://www.harryanddavid.com/h/scharffen-berger/all, https://www.harryanddavid.com/h/scharffen-berger/boxes, https://www.harryanddavid.com/h/scharffen-berger/best-sellers, https://www.harryanddavid.com/h/scharffen-berger/baking, https://www.harryanddavid.com/h/chocolates-sweets-candy/chocolate-boxes-bars and https://www.harryanddavid.com/h/chocolates-sweets-candy/simply-chocolate and 2 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 10 pages without an H1

    /, https://www.harryanddavid.com/h/chocolates-sweets-candy, https://www.harryanddavid.com/h/scharffen-berger/all, https://www.harryanddavid.com/h/scharffen-berger/boxes, https://www.harryanddavid.com/h/scharffen-berger/best-sellers and https://www.harryanddavid.com/h/scharffen-berger/baking and 4 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 8 pages with very little text

    https://www.harryanddavid.com/h/scharffen-berger/all, https://www.harryanddavid.com/h/scharffen-berger/boxes, https://www.harryanddavid.com/h/scharffen-berger/best-sellers, https://www.harryanddavid.com/h/scharffen-berger/baking, https://www.harryanddavid.com/h/chocolates-sweets-candy/chocolate-boxes-bars and https://www.harryanddavid.com/h/chocolates-sweets-candy/simply-chocolate and 2 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 32 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

Best practices

3 to fix71
  • 2 broken images

    2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://iqyioj.harryanddavid.com/g/uids?pld=SjHd7jX_dlWgChd7JwJozkk-Ji4hrJ7Q651uAlLVKuU61EwFj8DdY75GAmDU6D1c8ZyNH5JDK47KZO39lU2do2emBdbtoGwBd-zXoZyAJFnO6YOZRQj_KX2rDfxFMgX114_APuUWG71RBPxhP1ez-BNROmSV.

  • 3 small tap targets

    3 of 14 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “[object Object]”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix60
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 264 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 264 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Call Us”, “Track Your Order” and “Contact Us”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • 13 trackers load before any consent

    13

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amplitude, Criteo, FullStory, Google Ads and Google Tag Manager and 8 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (TrustArc) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 45 cookies set on arrival

    45

    Opening the homepage sets 45 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 72 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 72 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: TrustArc

    A consent management tool (TrustArc) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at scharffenberger.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
React
E-commerce
Shopify;Shopify Plus
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Fastly

Company

Headquarters
Berkeley

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 25 issues on scharffenberger.com, including 7 speed issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25