Website review, no card needed

seitron.com logo

seitron.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202629 issues · 83 checks

This review found 29 issues worth fixing on seitron.com, 8 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.7 s2.3 sApr 25Oct 102.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 20262.3 s
May 2, 20262.5 s
May 9, 20262.5 s
May 16, 20262.5 s
May 23, 20262.5 s
May 30, 20262.4 s
Jun 6, 20262.4 s
Jun 13, 20262.4 s
Jun 20, 20262.4 s
Jun 27, 20262.5 s
Jul 4, 20262.6 s
Jul 11, 20262.6 s
Jul 18, 20262.6 s
Jul 25, 20262.7 s
Aug 1, 20262.7 s
Aug 8, 20262.6 s
Aug 15, 20262.6 s
Aug 22, 20262.5 s
Aug 29, 20262.4 s
Sep 5, 20262.5 s
Sep 12, 20262.5 s
Sep 19, 20262.5 s
Sep 26, 20262.5 s
Oct 3, 20262.5 s
Oct 10, 20262.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
174 ms131 msApr 25Oct 10169 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 25, 2026148 ms
May 2, 2026142 ms
May 9, 2026136 ms
May 16, 2026136 ms
May 23, 2026137 ms
May 30, 2026139 ms
Jun 6, 2026140 ms
Jun 13, 2026138 ms
Jun 20, 2026140 ms
Jun 27, 2026146 ms
Jul 4, 2026149 ms
Jul 11, 2026152 ms
Jul 18, 2026152 ms
Jul 25, 2026154 ms
Aug 1, 2026155 ms
Aug 8, 2026151 ms
Aug 15, 2026148 ms
Aug 22, 2026146 ms
Aug 29, 2026144 ms
Sep 5, 2026152 ms
Sep 12, 2026163 ms
Sep 19, 2026165 ms
Sep 26, 2026167 ms
Oct 3, 2026169 ms
Oct 10, 2026169 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of seitron.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. seitron.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. seitron.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. seitron.com at 1.4 s1.4 s
  4. seitron.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  5. seitron.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  6. seitron.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  7. seitron.com at 3.2 s3.2 s
  8. seitron.com at 3.7 s3.7 s

Speed

7 to fix58
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    600 ms · 428 KiB

    About 428 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 58

    58/100

    Your mobile performance score is 58 (desktop: 79). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, cookiepro.com and Optanon and others), adding 823 KiB and 700 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 622 ms

    622 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 622 ms of main-thread work and 657 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    350 ms

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 350 ms.

  • 8 long tasks on the main thread

    8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 268 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Main-thread work: 2.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Improve image delivery

    180 KiB

    2 images could be 180 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    51 KiB

    6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (51 KiB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    37 KiB

    About 37 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    17 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 17 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 255 ms

    255 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 255 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.9 s

    5.9 s

    Your largest element takes 5.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Seitron Banner 45 Sito 1”.

  • Time to Interactive: 12.2 s

    12.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 12.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 5.7 s

    5.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 375 ms

    375 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 375 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 17% slower for real visitors

    +17%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 148 ms to 169 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 170 ms

    170 ms

    Real visitors wait 170 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.03

    0.03

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

100
  • About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.54 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.54 g of CO₂e: 64.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

4 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.9 MB in 143 requests

    1.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.9 MB in 143 requests on a phone: scripts 1.1 MB (73), images 384 KiB (15) and fonts 175 KiB (3). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 8893
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    2 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • 4 tap targets too small

    4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 5 links without text

    5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 16 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9286
  • Title is long (93 characters)

    Your title is 93 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Seitron: analysis of combustion and emissions, refrigeration, gas safety and thermoregula…”.

  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Heritage and Innovation” and “Refrigeration”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 51 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 51 pages on seitron.com and 9 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 150 characters

    Your meta description is 150 characters: “Analysis of combustion and emissions, refrigeration, gas safety and thermoregulation for professionals, private individ…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.seitron.com/en/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://admin.seitron.com/sitemap/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.seitron.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and contact details; sameAs (social profiles) and description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (710 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 7 pages share a title

    https://www.seitron.com/en/private/assistance, https://www.seitron.com/en/downloads/apps-software, https://www.seitron.com/en/downloads/firmware, https://www.seitron.com/en/downloads/catalogues, https://www.seitron.com/en/contacts and https://www.seitron.com/en/products/professional-refrigeration/ac-refrigeration-tools and 1 other all use the title “Seitron: thermoregulation, safety and gas systems”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 14 pages share a meta description

    https://www.seitron.com/en/industry/assistance, https://www.seitron.com/en/professionals/assistance, https://www.seitron.com/en/private/assistance, https://www.seitron.com/en/private/practical-guide, https://www.seitron.com/en/company/who-we-are-and-our-values and https://www.seitron.com/en/company/certifications and 8 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://www.seitron.com/en/company/sales-network has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 30 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 9 small tap targets

    9 of 19 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix72
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • About 561 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 561 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “E-Commerce Return Request”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

  • Opening hours shown

    Your opening hours are on the homepage.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 8 cookies set on arrival

    8

    Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 9 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at seitron.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Nuxt
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 29 issues on seitron.com, including 15 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25