Website review, no card needed
seitron.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202629 issues · 83 checks
This review found 29 issues worth fixing on seitron.com, 8 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
80BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 148 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 142 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 136 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 136 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 137 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 169 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.5 s
0.9 s
1.4 s
1.8 s
2.3 s
2.8 s
3.2 s
3.7 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
600 ms · 428 KiBAbout 428 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 58
58/100Your mobile performance score is 58 (desktop: 79). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
6 third-party services on the page
6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, cookiepro.com and Optanon and others), adding 823 KiB and 700 ms of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 622 ms
622 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 622 ms of main-thread work and 657 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
350 ms3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 350 ms.
8 long tasks on the main thread
8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 268 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Main-thread work: 2.3 s
A phone's processor spends 2.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Improve image delivery
180 KiB2 images could be 180 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
51 KiB6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (51 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
37 KiBAbout 37 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Legacy JavaScript
17 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 17 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 255 ms
255 msYour server sent the HTML in 255 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 5.9 s
5.9 sYour largest element takes 5.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Seitron Banner 45 Sito 1”.
Time to Interactive: 12.2 s
12.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 12.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.5 s
3.5 sThe first text or image appears after 3.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Speed Index: 5.7 s
5.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 375 ms
375 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 375 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 17% slower for real visitors
+17%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 148 ms to 169 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.4 s
2.4 sReal visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 170 ms
170 msReal visitors wait 170 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.03
0.03For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit
0.54 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.54 g of CO₂e: 64.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
4 checks passed
Page weight: 1.9 MB in 143 requests
1.9 MBYour homepage downloads 1.9 MB in 143 requests on a phone: scripts 1.1 MB (73), images 384 KiB (15) and fonts 175 KiB (3). That is a lean page.
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Invalid ARIA attributes
2 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
4 tap targets too small
4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
5 links without text
5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 16 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
42 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (93 characters)
Your title is 93 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Seitron: analysis of combustion and emissions, refrigeration, gas safety and thermoregula…”.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Heritage and Innovation” and “Refrigeration”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
51 internal links, 9 external
The homepage links to 51 pages on seitron.com and 9 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 150 characters
Your meta description is 150 characters: “Analysis of combustion and emissions, refrigeration, gas safety and thermoregulation for professionals, private individ…”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.seitron.com/en/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://admin.seitron.com/sitemap/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.seitron.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and contact details; sameAs (social profiles) and description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (710 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
7 pages share a title
https://www.seitron.com/en/private/assistance, https://www.seitron.com/en/downloads/apps-software, https://www.seitron.com/en/downloads/firmware, https://www.seitron.com/en/downloads/catalogues, https://www.seitron.com/en/contacts and https://www.seitron.com/en/products/professional-refrigeration/ac-refrigeration-tools and 1 other all use the title “Seitron: thermoregulation, safety and gas systems”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
14 pages share a meta description
https://www.seitron.com/en/industry/assistance, https://www.seitron.com/en/professionals/assistance, https://www.seitron.com/en/private/assistance, https://www.seitron.com/en/private/practical-guide, https://www.seitron.com/en/company/who-we-are-and-our-values and https://www.seitron.com/en/company/certifications and 8 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 page with very little text
https://www.seitron.com/en/company/sales-network has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 30 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
9 small tap targets
9 of 19 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
About 561 words of copy
The homepage carries about 561 words of visible text.
6 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “E-Commerce Return Request”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Opening hours shown
Your opening hours are on the homepage.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
8 cookies set on arrival
8Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
9 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at seitron.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Nuxt
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 29 issues on seitron.com, including 15 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.