Website review, no card needed
shadesofgreen.org website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202636 issues · 87 checks
This review found 36 issues worth fixing on shadesofgreen.org, 15 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
82BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 863 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 865 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 863 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 859 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 869 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 876 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 883 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 892 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 899 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 905 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 904 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 902 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 885 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 871 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 866 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 866 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 873 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 866 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 873 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 869 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 877 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 891 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 893 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 975 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 79 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 79 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 79 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 79 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 79 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Improve image delivery
10.1 s · 21.3 MB24 images could be 21.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 10.1 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
3.5 s13 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.5 s.
Reduce unused CSS
1.5 s · 281 KiBAbout 281 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 48
48/100Your mobile performance score is 48 (desktop: 64). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Reduce unused JavaScript
430 ms · 590 KiBAbout 590 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 430 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 247 ms
247 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 247 ms of main-thread work and 325 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, armymwr.com and Google Fonts and others), adding 662 KiB and 378 ms of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
176 KiB2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (176 KiB).
3 long tasks on the main thread
3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 136 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
100 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).
Document request latency
46 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Minify CSS
12 KiB12 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Minify JavaScript
7 KiB7 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.2 s
A phone's processor spends 1.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 457 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 81 ms
81 msYour server sent the HTML in 81 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 15.6 s
15.6 sYour largest element takes 15.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “hotel_sog_1-82.jpg”.
Time to Interactive: 18.6 s
18.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 18.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.4 s
4.4 sThe first text or image appears after 4.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.27
0.27The layout shifts by 0.27 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 21% slower for real visitors
+21%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.9 s to 1.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user TTFB: 807 ms
807 msReal visitors wait 807 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
28 images without width and height
28 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Speed Index: 4.4 s
4.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 4.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
0%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 79 ms to 79 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 103 ms
103 msReal visitors wait 103 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 161 ms
161 msScripts block the page for only 161 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 33.9 MB in 75 requests
33.9 MBYour homepage downloads 33.9 MB in 75 requests on a phone: images 24.1 MB (36), media 8.3 MB (1) and scripts 990 KiB (13). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
16 images over 500 KB
16 images weigh 22.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
16 images far larger than shown
11.0 MB16 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example AdobeStock_694150862.jpeg at 4,659 px wide, shown at 360 px. Resized copies would save about 11.0 MB.
23 images in older formats
23 images (23.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
22 images below the first screen load straight away
22 images further down the page (19.0 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 9.6 g of CO₂ per visit
9.62 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 9.62 g of CO₂e: 1154.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
3 text elements with low contrast
3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Links look like plain text
1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 35 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 2 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (23 characters)
Your title is only 23 characters: “Home :: Shades of Green”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
7 links with vague text
7 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
66 internal links, 11 external
The homepage links to 66 pages on shadesofgreen.org and 11 external pages.
4 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Vacation Memories”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.shadesofgreen.org/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.shadesofgreen.org/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.shadesofgreen.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,026 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
13 pages without a meta description
https://www.shadesofgreen.org/rooms, https://www.shadesofgreen.org/about-shades-green/eligibility, https://www.shadesofgreen.org/experiences, https://www.shadesofgreen.org/dining-drinks, https://www.shadesofgreen.org/wellness and https://www.shadesofgreen.org/special-offers/monthly-specials and 7 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 37 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 small tap targets
2 of 10 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 3 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 776 words of copy
The homepage carries about 776 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “BOOK NOW” and “Learn More”.
19 calls to action
The homepage has 19 calls to action, for example “Book Now”, “Close Book Now” and “Contact Us”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
4 cookies set on arrival
4Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
6 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at shadesofgreen.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2020.
Stack
- CMS
- Concrete CMS
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Company
- Founded
- 1994
- Headquarters
- Monterey
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 36 issues on shadesofgreen.org, including 15 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.