Website review, no card needed

shoppertrak.com logo

shoppertrak.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202635 issues · 82 checks

This review found 35 issues worth fixing on shoppertrak.com, 11 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
6.9 s3.2 sMay 9Oct 243.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20266.5 s
May 16, 20266.3 s
May 23, 20266.3 s
May 30, 20266.1 s
Jun 6, 20265.7 s
Jun 13, 20265.2 s
Jun 20, 20265.1 s
Jun 27, 20265.0 s
Jul 4, 20265.0 s
Jul 11, 20265.1 s
Jul 18, 20265.0 s
Jul 25, 20264.9 s
Aug 1, 20264.6 s
Aug 8, 20264.1 s
Aug 15, 20263.9 s
Aug 22, 20263.9 s
Aug 29, 20263.9 s
Sep 5, 20264.0 s
Sep 12, 20264.0 s
Sep 19, 20263.8 s
Sep 26, 20263.6 s
Oct 3, 20263.7 s
Oct 10, 20263.7 s
Oct 17, 20263.6 s
Oct 24, 20263.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
145 ms127 msMay 9Oct 24139 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026138 ms
May 16, 2026137 ms
May 23, 2026130 ms
May 30, 2026129 ms
Jun 6, 2026134 ms
Jun 13, 2026134 ms
Jun 20, 2026142 ms
Jun 27, 2026143 ms
Jul 4, 2026135 ms
Jul 11, 2026137 ms
Jul 18, 2026129 ms
Jul 25, 2026133 ms
Aug 1, 2026136 ms
Aug 8, 2026137 ms
Aug 15, 2026140 ms
Aug 22, 2026141 ms
Aug 29, 2026142 ms
Sep 5, 2026139 ms
Sep 12, 2026142 ms
Sep 19, 2026135 ms
Sep 26, 2026135 ms
Oct 3, 2026135 ms
Oct 10, 2026131 ms
Oct 17, 2026137 ms
Oct 24, 2026139 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of shoppertrak.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. shoppertrak.com at 1.4 s1.4 s
  2. shoppertrak.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  3. shoppertrak.com at 4.2 s4.2 s
  4. shoppertrak.com at 5.6 s5.6 s
  5. shoppertrak.com at 7.0 s7.0 s
  6. shoppertrak.com at 8.4 s8.4 s
  7. shoppertrak.com at 9.8 s9.8 s
  8. shoppertrak.com at 11.2 s11.2 s

Speed

9 to fix43
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    4.6 s · 870 KiB

    About 870 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.3 s

    6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.3 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.6 s · 472 KiB

    74 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (472 KiB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    2.5 s · 519 KiB

    About 519 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 43

    43/100

    Your mobile performance score is 43 (desktop: 37). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Tealium, Google Tag Manager and Hotjar and others), adding 895 KiB and 1.3 s of main-thread time.

  • Tealium adds 702 ms

    702 ms

    Tealium costs a phone 702 ms of main-thread work and 81 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 400 ms

    400 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 400 ms of main-thread work and 525 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    245 KiB

    8 images could be 245 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 11 long tasks on the main thread

    11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 172 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    21 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 7 ms

    7 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 7 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 21.6 s

    21.6 s

    Your largest element takes 21.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Celebrating 60 Years of Retail Firsts. Innovation Leadershi…”.

  • Speed Index: 15.2 s

    15.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 15.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 21.9 s

    21.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 21.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 6.1 s

    6.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 6.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Real visitors wait 3.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 439 ms

    439 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 439 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 4 images without width and height

    4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    0%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 138 ms to 139 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 137 ms

    137 ms

    Real visitors wait 137 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.07

    0.07

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.07 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 44% faster for real visitors

    -44%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 6.5 s to 3.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.085

    0.085

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.085, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix68
  • Page weight: 3.1 MB in 193 requests

    3.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.1 MB in 193 requests on a phone: scripts 1.9 MB (60), stylesheets 541 KiB (7) and images 522 KiB (69). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 6 images below the first screen load straight away

    6 images further down the page (489 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    34 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 4aa202ca4798459ea05401761d9faa2c.jpg at 1,080 px wide, shown at 318 px. Resized copies would save about 34 KiB.

  • About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.87 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.87 g of CO₂e: 104.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

100
1 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 20 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 8588
  • 48 links crawlers can't follow

    48 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 3 H1 headlines

    There are 3 <h1> headlines (“Celebrating 60 Years of Retail Firsts. Innovation…”, “Category Level Shrink Insights” and “Smart Exit Solutions”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 7 links with vague text

    7 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 201 internal links, 10 external

    The homepage links to 201 pages on shoppertrak.com and 10 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 142 characters

    Your meta description is 142 characters: “The global leader in retail systems including RFID, EAS, anti-theft tags & labels, detachers, inventory management & re…”.

  • Title: 41 characters

    Your title is a healthy 41 characters: “Retail Technology Solutions - Sensormatic”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.sensormatic.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Corporation, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.sensormatic.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • Parts of the site are closed to 6 AI crawlers

    Your robots.txt lets ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User), Claude search (Claude-SearchBot), Claude (Claude-User), Perplexity (PerplexityBot) and Perplexity (Perplexity-User) read the homepage but closes other sections to them, so answers about those pages can't cite you.

3 checks passed
  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, sameAs (social profiles) and description; logo and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (913 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.sensormatic.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 0 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 8 pages share 2 titles

    https://www.sensormatic.com/en_in, https://www.sensormatic.com/en_my, https://www.sensormatic.com/en_nz, https://www.sensormatic.com/en_sg, https://www.sensormatic.com/en_hk and https://www.sensormatic.com/en_mo all use the title “The Future of Retail Technology | Inventory Intelligence, Loss Preven…”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://www.sensormatic.com/support and https://www.sensormatic.com/media-center have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 9 pages share a meta description

    https://www.sensormatic.com/en_au, https://www.sensormatic.com/en_in, https://www.sensormatic.com/en_my, https://www.sensormatic.com/en_nz, https://www.sensormatic.com/en_sg and https://www.sensormatic.com/en_hk and 1 other use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 2 pages slow to respond

    https://www.sensormatic.com/media-center and https://www.sensormatic.com/become-a-partner took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 90 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 6988
  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 2 deprecated browser APIs that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 2 distorted images

    2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • 3 low-resolution images

    3 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    13 of 14 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 420 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 420 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Us” and “Learn More”.

  • 17 calls to action

    The homepage has 17 calls to action, for example “Download”, “Contact Us” and “Learn More”.

Privacy and tracking

  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and LinkedIn Insight and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (TrustArc) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 43 cookies set on arrival

    43

    Opening the homepage sets 43 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 42 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 42 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: TrustArc

    A consent management tool (TrustArc) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at shoppertrak.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Hosting
Imperva

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 35 issues on shoppertrak.com, including 19 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25