Website review, no card needed
siamcomputing.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202651 issues · 92 checks
This review found 51 issues worth fixing on siamcomputing.com, 25 of them high impact, across 92 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
68DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 351 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 340 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 334 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 289 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 277 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 275 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 263 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 284 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 266 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 265 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 266 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 226 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 237 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 244 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 234 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 245 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 273 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 256 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 260 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 256 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 248 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 257 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.6 s
3.2 s
4.9 s
6.5 s
8.1 s
9.7 s
11.3 s
13.0 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.0 s · 1.5 MBAbout 1.5 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.0 s faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
1.1 s · 2.5 MB13 images could be 2.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.5 s15 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.5 s.
Font display
1.8 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.8 s).
Reduce initial server response time
1.6 sReduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 1.6 s on a phone.
Document request latency
1.6 sThe HTML itself could arrive about 1.6 s sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Mobile performance score: 30
30/100Your mobile performance score is 30. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
9,960 HTML elements
The page has 9,960 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Main-thread work: 7.3 s
A phone's processor spends 7.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and small.chat and others), adding 3.9 MB and 1.9 s of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
600 ms · 780 KiB17 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (780 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
900 ms · 243 KiBAbout 243 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 521 ms
521 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 521 ms of main-thread work and 611 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 438 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
substackcdn.com adds 194 ms
194 mssubstackcdn.com costs a phone 194 ms of main-thread work and 1.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
small.chat adds 312 ms
312 mssmall.chat costs a phone 312 ms of main-thread work and 505 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Facebook adds 313 ms
313 msFacebook costs a phone 313 ms of main-thread work and 280 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google CDN adds 153 ms
153 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 153 ms of main-thread work and 355 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Server response: 1.7 s
1.7 sYour server takes 1.7 s to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.
Legacy JavaScript
100 ms · 22 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 22 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 28.3 s
28.3 sYour largest element takes 28.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Our PORTFOLIO”.
Time to Interactive: 39.6 s
39.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 39.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 13.7 s
13.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 13.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 6.3 s
6.3 sThe first text or image appears after 6.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.4 s
1.4 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.4 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 3.0 s
3.0 sReal visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 287 ms
287 msReal visitors wait 287 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 2.6 s
2.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 824 ms
824 msReal visitors wait 824 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
14 images without width and height
14 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.04
0.04For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.04 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 27% faster for real visitors
-27%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 351 ms to 257 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.037
0.037The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.037, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 12.8 MB in 352 requests
12.8 MBYour homepage downloads 12.8 MB in 352 requests on a phone: images 7.3 MB (71), scripts 4.1 MB (216) and HTML 795 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images over 500 KB
3 images weigh 2.2 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
3 images far larger than shown
712 KiB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example out1.gif at 518 px wide, shown at 82 px. Resized copies would save about 712 KiB.
10 images in older formats
10 images (2.7 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
6 images below the first screen load straight away
6 images further down the page (972 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 3.6 g of CO₂ per visit
3.62 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.62 g of CO₂e: 434.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Invalid ARIA attributes
1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (9 elements)
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 9 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
3 text elements with low contrast
3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Frames without titles
2 frames have no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what they contain.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (12 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Heading levels should only increase by one (5 elements)
Heading levels should only increase by one: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
3 links without text
3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 9 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
39 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 7 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
19 internal links, 7 external
The homepage links to 19 pages on siamcomputing.com and 7 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 153 characters
Your meta description is 153 characters: “Siam Computing is a product development company specializing in the strategy, design, and engineering of digital soluti…”.
Title: 53 characters
Your title is a healthy 53 characters: “Product Development Services | IT Consulting Services”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://siamcomputing.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://siamcomputing.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Most text only appears after JavaScript runs
17%A phone browser shows 846 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 147. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://siamcomputing.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
10 pages without an H1
https://siamcomputing.com/contact, https://siamcomputing.com/product-development/product-strategy-and-consulting, https://siamcomputing.com/product-development/dedicated-product-team, https://siamcomputing.com/product-development/mvp-development, https://siamcomputing.com/product-development/co-development-program and https://siamcomputing.com/digital-transformation/ui-ux-design and 4 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
10 pages with very little text
https://siamcomputing.com/contact, https://siamcomputing.com/product-development/product-strategy-and-consulting, https://siamcomputing.com/product-development/dedicated-product-team, https://siamcomputing.com/product-development/mvp-development, https://siamcomputing.com/product-development/co-development-program and https://siamcomputing.com/digital-transformation/ui-ux-design and 4 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
10 internal pages checked
We fetched 10 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 10 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 10 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 10 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 third-party cookies
3 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
17 of 18 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 846 words of copy
The homepage carries about 846 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Us”.
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Register here” and “Contact us”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
4 cookies set on arrival
4Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
29 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 29 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at siamcomputing.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Hostinger
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 51 issues on siamcomputing.com, including 30 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.