Website review, no card needed

siebtechnik-tema.de logo

siebtechnik-tema.de website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202629 issues · 77 checks

This review found 29 issues worth fixing on siebtechnik-tema.de, 8 of them high impact, across 77 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.0 s2.2 sMay 2Oct 172.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.6 s
May 9, 20262.6 s
May 16, 20262.6 s
May 23, 20262.6 s
May 30, 20262.7 s
Jun 6, 20262.6 s
Jun 13, 20262.7 s
Jun 20, 20262.7 s
Jun 27, 20262.9 s
Jul 4, 20262.8 s
Jul 11, 20262.8 s
Jul 18, 20262.7 s
Jul 25, 20262.3 s
Aug 1, 20262.4 s
Aug 8, 20262.5 s
Aug 15, 20262.6 s
Aug 22, 20262.8 s
Aug 29, 20262.8 s
Sep 5, 20262.4 s
Sep 12, 20262.4 s
Sep 19, 20262.3 s
Sep 26, 20262.4 s
Oct 3, 20262.6 s
Oct 10, 20262.6 s
Oct 17, 20262.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
178 ms103 msMay 2Oct 17112 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026154 ms
May 9, 2026155 ms
May 16, 2026147 ms
May 23, 2026129 ms
May 30, 2026137 ms
Jun 6, 2026138 ms
Jun 13, 2026152 ms
Jun 20, 2026156 ms
Jun 27, 2026156 ms
Jul 4, 2026151 ms
Jul 11, 2026162 ms
Jul 18, 2026169 ms
Jul 25, 2026143 ms
Aug 1, 2026141 ms
Aug 8, 2026129 ms
Aug 15, 2026139 ms
Aug 22, 2026162 ms
Aug 29, 2026147 ms
Sep 5, 2026145 ms
Sep 12, 2026130 ms
Sep 19, 2026114 ms
Sep 26, 2026114 ms
Oct 3, 2026117 ms
Oct 10, 2026114 ms
Oct 17, 2026112 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of siebtechnik-tema.de (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. siebtechnik-tema.de at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. siebtechnik-tema.de at 1.0 s1.0 s
  3. siebtechnik-tema.de at 1.5 s1.5 s
  4. siebtechnik-tema.de at 2.0 s2.0 s
  5. siebtechnik-tema.de at 2.5 s2.5 s
  6. siebtechnik-tema.de at 3.0 s3.0 s
  7. siebtechnik-tema.de at 3.5 s3.5 s
  8. siebtechnik-tema.de at 4.0 s4.0 s

Speed

7 to fix69
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 69

    69/100

    Your mobile performance score is 69 (desktop: 88). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Improve image delivery

    727 KiB

    9 images could be 727 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Font display

    450 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 450 ms).

  • Google Tag Manager adds 362 ms

    362 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 362 ms of main-thread work and 341 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 52 KiB

    About 52 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 1,821 HTML elements

    The page has 1,821 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google/Doubleclick Ads and Google Analytics), adding 342 KiB and 362 ms of main-thread time.

  • 5 long tasks on the main thread

    5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 239 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    206 KiB

    About 206 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 732 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 5 ms

    5 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 10.3 s

    10.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 10.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.374

    0.374

    The layout shifts by 0.374 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 5.3 s

    5.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 286 ms

    286 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 286 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 18 images without width and height

    18 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    0%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.6 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 111 ms

    111 ms

    Real visitors wait 111 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 27% faster for real visitors

    -27%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 154 ms to 112 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Your largest element renders in 2.4 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the image “Screening machines from SIEBTECHNIK TEMA, screening media f…”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.5 MB in 66 requests

    2.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.5 MB in 66 requests on a phone: images 1.3 MB (25), scripts 616 KiB (26) and fonts 510 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.70 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.70 g of CO₂e: 84.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 8693
  • ARIA roles used must conform to valid values (1 element)

    ARIA roles used must conform to valid values: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (1 element)

    ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 22 text elements with low contrast

    22 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 50 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 3 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9278
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (23 characters)

    Your title is only 23 characters: “Home - SIEBTECHNIK TEMA”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • 32 links with vague text

    32 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 553 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 553 pages on siebtechnik-tema.de and 6 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 120 characters

    Your meta description is 120 characters: “Over 100 years of expertise in the field of solid-liquid separation and the processing of bulk materials. Find out more!”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.siebtechnik-tema.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.siebtechnik-tema.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.siebtechnik-tema.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,270 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 199 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 26 small tap targets

    26 of 62 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix86
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • About 1,653 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,653 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn more” and “Contact”.

  • 11 calls to action

    The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Learn more” and “contact form”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 3 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at siebtechnik-tema.de, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 29 issues on siebtechnik-tema.de, including 16 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25