Website review, no card needed
sievers-group.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202617 issues · 73 checks
This review found 17 issues worth fixing on sievers-group.com, 3 of them high impact, across 73 checks. The most urgent: no call to action on the first screen. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
89BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 181 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 221 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 268 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 278 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 296 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 219 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 174 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 150 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.2 s
1.6 s
2.0 s
2.4 s
2.9 s
3.3 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
750 ms2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 750 ms.
2,320 HTML elements
The page has 2,320 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
nitrocdn.com adds 32 ms
32 msnitrocdn.com costs a phone 32 ms of main-thread work and 404 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 96 KiB14 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (96 KiB).
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 15 KiB1 image could be 15 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
3 long tasks on the main thread
3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 76 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
1 third-party service on the page
1 third-party service load with your homepage (nitrocdn.com), adding 404 KiB and 32 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
67 KiBAbout 67 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
3 checks passed
Mobile performance score: 91
91/100Your mobile performance score is 91. That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).
Main-thread work: 1.2 s
A phone's processor spends 1.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 218 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 232 ms
232 msYour server sent the HTML in 232 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 3.3 s
3.3 sYour largest element takes 3.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Ihr Partner für IT und Digital Business. Wir bringen dem Mi…”.
Speed Index: 3.6 s
3.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 3.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
12 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors wait 1.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 147 ms
147 msReal visitors wait 147 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 729 ms
729 msReal visitors wait 729 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 23% faster for real visitors
-23%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 181 ms to 150 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 57% faster for real visitors
-57%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Time to Interactive: 3.3 s
3.3 sThe page is fully interactive after 3.3 s.
First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s
1.4 sThe first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.023
0.023The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.023, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 53 ms
53 msScripts block the page for only 53 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit
0.36 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.36 g of CO₂e: 42.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
4 checks passed
Page weight: 1.3 MB in 64 requests
1.3 MBYour homepage downloads 1.3 MB in 64 requests on a phone: other files 673 KiB (37), images 186 KiB (5) and fonts 125 KiB (3). That is a lean page.
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
8 images without alt text
8 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
8 links without text
8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 checks passed
38 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 38 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 0 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Structured data has 2 problems
Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, Organization, SiteNavigationElement and WebPage) but with 2 problems, for example “BreadcrumbList: itemListElement is an empty list”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
360 internal links, 10 external
The homepage links to 360 pages on sievers-group.com and 10 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 92 characters
Your meta description is 92 characters: “✅Wir bringen dem Mittelstand Sicherheit ✅ Wir denken IT strategisch ✅ Wir machen IT einfach.”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Ihr Partner für IT und Digital Business.”.
Title: 57 characters
Your title is a healthy 57 characters: “Ihr IT-Systemhaus in Osnabrück und Kaarst – SIEVERS-GROUP”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.sievers-group.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.sievers-group.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.sievers-group.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,793 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages without a meta description
https://www.sievers-group.com/solution and https://www.sievers-group.com/solution/business-intelligence/datenmanagement/schnelle-datenanalysen-mit-datenbankloesungen-von-exasol have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 122 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 small tap targets
3 of 13 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 4 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
A 8-field form
Your longest form asks for 8 fields (4 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 610 words of copy
The homepage carries about 610 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 4 phone links and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
1 cookie set on arrival
1Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
2 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at sievers-group.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Hosting
- Hetzner
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 17 issues on sievers-group.com, including 6 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.