Website review, no card needed
sigo.com.ve website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202651 issues · 96 checks
This review found 51 issues worth fixing on sigo.com.ve, 24 of them high impact, across 96 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
72CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 141 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 142 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 140 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 174 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
4.8 s9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.8 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.1 s · 911 KiBAbout 911 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
1.9 s · 401 KiBAbout 401 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
1.6 s · 632 KiB23 images could be 632 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
600 ms · 635 KiB91 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (635 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 57
57/100Your mobile performance score is 57. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
2,857 HTML elements
The page has 2,857 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Main-thread work: 2.6 s
A phone's processor spends 2.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 614 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Legacy JavaScript
200 ms · 80 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 80 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.
3 third-party services on the page
3 third-party services load with your homepage (Facebook, Cloudflare CDN and run.app), adding 282 KiB and 250 ms of main-thread time.
Document request latency
117 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Font display
100 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).
4 long tasks on the main thread
4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 96 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
89 KiB89 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
5 KiB5 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 80 ms
80 msYour server sent the HTML in 80 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 9.9 s
9.9 sYour largest element takes 9.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s.
First Contentful Paint: 6.9 s
6.9 sThe first text or image appears after 6.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 16.4 s
16.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 16.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 8.9 s
8.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Tap response (INP) got 20% slower for real visitors
+20%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 141 ms to 174 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user TTFB: 861 ms
861 msReal visitors wait 861 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
0%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.9 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 150 ms
150 msReal visitors wait 150 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.003
0.003The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.003, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 12 ms
12 msScripts block the page for only 12 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.3 MB in 98 requests
4.3 MBYour homepage downloads 4.3 MB in 98 requests on a phone: images 2.0 MB (43), scripts 1.6 MB (43) and stylesheets 462 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
10 images in older formats
10 images (1.6 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image far larger than shown
102 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example 0026910.jpeg at 1,925 px wide, shown at 329 px. Resized copies would save about 102 KiB.
3 images below the first screen load straight away
3 images further down the page (159 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit
1.22 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.22 g of CO₂e: 145.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Invalid ARIA attributes
2 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (2 elements)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Unlabelled dropdowns
2 dropdowns have no label.
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (1 element)
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Images must have alternative text (1 element)
Images must have alternative text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Hidden but focusable
14 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
3 text elements with low contrast
3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (2 elements)
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Interactive controls must not be nested (2 elements)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (37 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 37 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (2 elements)
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 checks passed
39 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 16 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (25 characters)
Your title is only 25 characters: “SuperMarket Sigo Costazul”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://sigo.com.ve/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
566 internal links, 8 external
The homepage links to 566 pages on sigo.com.ve and 8 external pages.
2 checks passed
Meta description: 136 characters
Your meta description is 136 characters: “Sirviendo con amor desde 1972. Haz tus compras online y recíbelas en la puerta de tu casa. Ingresa YA y encuentra ¡TODO…”.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://sigo.com.ve/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,493 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
14 pages share a meta description
https://sigo.com.ve/compareproducts, https://sigo.com.ve/wishlist, https://sigo.com.ve/hormona, https://sigo.com.ve/v%C3%ADveres-2, https://sigo.com.ve/harinas and https://sigo.com.ve/ma%C3%ADz and 8 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
3 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 3 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://sigo.com.ve/v%C3%ADveres-2, whose canonical is https://sigo.com.ve/v%c3%adveres-2. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
2 pages slow to respond
https://sigo.com.ve/v%C3%ADveres-2 and https://sigo.com.ve/pastas took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 195 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Scrolls sideways on phones
On a 390 px-wide phone the page scrolls sideways, a sign that something is wider than the screen.
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
235 of 251 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 637 words of copy
The homepage carries about 637 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Meta Pixel.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
4 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at sigo.com.ve, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- nopCommerce
- Framework
- jQuery
- Hosting
- AWS
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 51 issues on sigo.com.ve, including 16 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.