Website review, no card needed

siliconii.com logo

siliconii.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202640 issues · 89 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on siliconii.com, 15 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.0 s2.2 sMay 2Oct 173.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20263.8 s
May 9, 20263.6 s
May 16, 20263.1 s
May 23, 20263.1 s
May 30, 20263.5 s
Jun 6, 20263.2 s
Jun 13, 20263.3 s
Jun 20, 20263.6 s
Jun 27, 20263.1 s
Jul 4, 20262.6 s
Jul 11, 20262.8 s
Jul 18, 20262.4 s
Jul 25, 20262.7 s
Aug 1, 20263.4 s
Aug 8, 20262.7 s
Aug 15, 20262.7 s
Aug 22, 20262.7 s
Aug 29, 20262.6 s
Sep 5, 20262.9 s
Sep 12, 20263.2 s
Sep 19, 20263.0 s
Sep 26, 20263.2 s
Oct 3, 20263.2 s
Oct 10, 20263.3 s
Oct 17, 20263.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
88 ms69 msMay 2Oct 1785 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202681 ms
May 9, 202680 ms
May 16, 202679 ms
May 23, 202677 ms
May 30, 202678 ms
Jun 6, 202678 ms
Jun 13, 202679 ms
Jun 20, 202673 ms
Jun 27, 202671 ms
Jul 4, 202671 ms
Jul 11, 202673 ms
Jul 18, 202679 ms
Jul 25, 202686 ms
Aug 1, 202685 ms
Aug 8, 202682 ms
Aug 15, 202679 ms
Aug 22, 202682 ms
Aug 29, 202680 ms
Sep 5, 202679 ms
Sep 12, 202681 ms
Sep 19, 202680 ms
Sep 26, 202681 ms
Oct 3, 202684 ms
Oct 10, 202683 ms
Oct 17, 202685 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of siliconii.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. siliconii.com at 1.4 s1.4 s
  2. siliconii.com at 2.9 s2.9 s
  3. siliconii.com at 4.3 s4.3 s
  4. siliconii.com at 5.7 s5.7 s
  5. siliconii.com at 7.2 s7.2 s
  6. siliconii.com at 8.6 s8.6 s
  7. siliconii.com at 10.0 s10.0 s
  8. siliconii.com at 11.4 s11.4 s

Speed

5 to fix70
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.1 s · 8.5 MB

    92 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (8.5 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.9 s

    24 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.9 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    4.3 MB

    29 images could be 4.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Mobile performance score: 70

    70/100

    Your mobile performance score is 70 (desktop: 86). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    750 ms · 151 KiB

    About 151 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • 2 third-party services on the page

    2 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics), adding 179 KiB and 111 ms of main-thread time.

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 61 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    15 KiB

    About 15 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 279 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 5.4 s

    5.4 s

    Real visitors wait 5.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 12.4 s

    12.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 12.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.3 s

    4.3 s

    Your largest element takes 4.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s.

  • 100 images without width and height

    100 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Time to Interactive: 4.3 s

    4.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 4.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 81 ms to 85 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 79 ms

    79 ms

    Real visitors wait 79 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.08

    0.08

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.08 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 694 ms

    694 ms

    Real visitors wait 694 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 10% faster for real visitors

    -10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.8 s to 3.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.028

    0.028

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.028, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 11 ms

    11 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 11 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix38
  • Page weight: 8.7 MB in 97 requests

    8.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 8.7 MB in 97 requests on a phone: images 5.4 MB (64), fonts 2.9 MB (4) and scripts 342 KiB (13). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 1.6 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 17 images in older formats

    17 images (4.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 14 images below the first screen load straight away

    14 images further down the page (4.1 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 2.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.47 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.47 g of CO₂e: 296.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 8386
  • 7 text elements with low contrast

    7 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 4 tap targets too small

    4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (21 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 21 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 11 links without text

    11 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (16 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 16 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Users should be able to zoom and scale the text up to 500% (1 element)

    Users should be able to zoom and scale the text up to 500%: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 53 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 33 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 42 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 33 passed and 9 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 9272
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (7 characters)

    Your title is only 7 characters: “(주)실리콘투”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is short (44 characters)

    Your meta description is only 44 characters: “화장품 유통 무역 업체, 해외 판매 및 해외 마케팅 지원, 브랜드 영업대행 안내”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 70 internal links, 13 external

    The homepage links to 70 pages on siliconii.com and 13 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://siliconii.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.siliconii.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.siliconii.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (345 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix76
  • 15 pages point its canonical at the homepage

    https://www.siliconii.com/en, https://www.siliconii.com/jp, https://www.siliconii.com/sub/sub01_01.php, https://www.siliconii.com/sub/sub01_02.php, https://www.siliconii.com/sub/sub01_03.php and https://www.siliconii.com/sub/sub01_05.php and 9 others declare the homepage as their canonical URL, which tells Google they are copies of the homepage and keeps them out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.

  • 16 pages share a title

    /, https://www.siliconii.com/en, https://www.siliconii.com/jp, https://www.siliconii.com/sub/sub01_01.php, https://www.siliconii.com/sub/sub01_02.php and https://www.siliconii.com/sub/sub01_03.php and 10 others all use the title “(주)실리콘투”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 15 pages share a meta description

    https://www.siliconii.com/en, https://www.siliconii.com/jp, https://www.siliconii.com/sub/sub01_01.php, https://www.siliconii.com/sub/sub01_02.php, https://www.siliconii.com/sub/sub01_03.php and https://www.siliconii.com/sub/sub01_05.php and 9 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 pages without an H1

    https://www.siliconii.com/en, https://www.siliconii.com/jp, https://www.siliconii.com/sub/sub01_01.php, https://www.siliconii.com/sub/sub01_02.php, https://www.siliconii.com/sub/sub01_03.php and https://www.siliconii.com/sub/sub01_05.php and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 9 pages with very little text

    https://www.siliconii.com/sub/sub01_01.php, https://www.siliconii.com/sub/sub01_05.php, https://www.siliconii.com/sub/sub01_04.php, https://www.siliconii.com/sub/sub02_01.php, https://www.siliconii.com/sub/sub02_09.php and https://www.siliconii.com/sub/sub02_02.php and 3 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 42 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9293
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    64 of 73 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix83
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 25 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 339 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 339 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Us”.

  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact Us” and “Join Us Recruit View More”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 2 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at siliconii.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on siliconii.com, including 13 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25