Website review, no card needed

simpsonmillar.co.uk logo

simpsonmillar.co.uk website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202629 issues · 85 checks

This review found 29 issues worth fixing on simpsonmillar.co.uk, 7 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: aRIA attributes must conform to valid names (1 element). Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.8 s1.6 sMay 16Oct 311.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.6 s
May 23, 20261.7 s
May 30, 20261.7 s
Jun 6, 20261.7 s
Jun 13, 20261.7 s
Jun 20, 20261.7 s
Jun 27, 20261.7 s
Jul 4, 20261.8 s
Jul 11, 20261.8 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.8 s
Aug 1, 20261.8 s
Aug 8, 20261.8 s
Aug 15, 20261.8 s
Aug 22, 20261.8 s
Aug 29, 20261.8 s
Sep 5, 20261.8 s
Sep 12, 20261.8 s
Sep 19, 20261.7 s
Sep 26, 20261.7 s
Oct 3, 20261.7 s
Oct 10, 20261.8 s
Oct 17, 20261.8 s
Oct 24, 20261.7 s
Oct 31, 20261.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
131 ms108 msMay 16Oct 31113 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026112 ms
May 23, 2026111 ms
May 30, 2026113 ms
Jun 6, 2026116 ms
Jun 13, 2026118 ms
Jun 20, 2026123 ms
Jun 27, 2026121 ms
Jul 4, 2026125 ms
Jul 11, 2026128 ms
Jul 18, 2026127 ms
Jul 25, 2026123 ms
Aug 1, 2026122 ms
Aug 8, 2026120 ms
Aug 15, 2026120 ms
Aug 22, 2026123 ms
Aug 29, 2026123 ms
Sep 5, 2026120 ms
Sep 12, 2026119 ms
Sep 19, 2026114 ms
Sep 26, 2026111 ms
Oct 3, 2026111 ms
Oct 10, 2026111 ms
Oct 17, 2026112 ms
Oct 24, 2026112 ms
Oct 31, 2026113 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of simpsonmillar.co.uk (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. simpsonmillar.co.uk at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. simpsonmillar.co.uk at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. simpsonmillar.co.uk at 1.2 s1.2 s
  4. simpsonmillar.co.uk at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. simpsonmillar.co.uk at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. simpsonmillar.co.uk at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. simpsonmillar.co.uk at 2.7 s2.7 s
  8. simpsonmillar.co.uk at 3.1 s3.1 s

Speed

9 to fix73
  • Mobile performance score: 73

    73/100

    Your mobile performance score is 73. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Render-blocking requests

    800 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 800 ms.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    450 ms · 324 KiB

    About 324 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    600 ms · 107 KiB

    12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (107 KiB).

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot and Trust Pilot and others), adding 569 KiB and 592 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 467 ms

    467 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 467 ms of main-thread work and 366 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 9 long tasks on the main thread

    9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 334 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 2,423 HTML elements

    The page has 2,423 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Main-thread work: 2.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 61 KiB

    About 61 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    100 ms · 31 KiB

    2 images could be 31 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify CSS

    50 ms · 10 KiB

    10 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    12 KiB

    12 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 381 ms

    381 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 381 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 7.4 s

    7.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 7.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 507 ms

    507 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 507 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.7 s

    3.7 s

    Your largest element takes 3.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Happy man shaking hands”.

  • Speed Index: 4.6 s

    4.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 4 images without width and height

    4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 112 ms to 113 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.6 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 121 ms

    121 ms

    Real visitors wait 121 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 694 ms

    694 ms

    Real visitors wait 694 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.037

    0.037

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.037, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

100
  • About 0.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.30 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.30 g of CO₂e: 36.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

4 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.1 MB in 47 requests

    1.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.1 MB in 47 requests on a phone: scripts 794 KiB (20), images 141 KiB (15) and fonts 64 KiB (5). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 8387
  • ARIA attributes must conform to valid names (1 element)

    ARIA attributes must conform to valid names: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

  • Form elements should have a visible label (1 element)

    Form elements should have a visible label: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • 16 links without text

    16 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (9 elements).

1 checks passed
  • 50 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 8 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 8589
  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Simpson Millar Solicitors” and “Simpson Millar Solicitors”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (Corporation) but with 1 problem, for example “ld+json block 2 is not valid JSON (Bad control character in string literal in JSON at position )”.

  • 7 links crawlers can't follow

    7 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 151 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 151 pages on simpsonmillar.co.uk and 9 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 130 characters

    Your meta description is 130 characters: “Highly experienced law firm with offices in Bristol, Cardiff, Lancaster, Leeds, Liverpool, London, Manchester. Get in t…”.

  • Title: 64 characters

    Your title is a healthy 64 characters: “Simpson Millar Solicitors - Trusted, Expert Legal Advice For You”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.simpsonmillar.co.uk/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.simpsonmillar.co.uk/site-map/xml/.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.simpsonmillar.co.uk/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,841 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 105 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 8897
  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    25 of 26 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix92
  • A 31-field form

    Your longest form asks for 31 fields (31 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 951 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 951 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Call us today 0800 260 5010” and “Talk to us”.

  • 8 calls to action

    The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Contact us”, “Request a Callback” and “Call us today 0800 260 5010”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 84 testimonial or review blocks, a star rating, 13 trust badges and “more than 30,000 clients”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 4 phone links and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 9 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at simpsonmillar.co.uk, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Bootstrap
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Ukfast Ans Academy Limited

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 29 issues on simpsonmillar.co.uk, including 15 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25