Website review, no card needed
sinarmas.co.id website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202644 issues · 86 checks
This review found 44 issues worth fixing on sinarmas.co.id, 19 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
72CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 220 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 211 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 215 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 255 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 255 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 277 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 275 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 244 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 263 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 216 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 232 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 223 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 214 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 189 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 192 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 192 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 225 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 248 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 254 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.8 s
3.7 s
5.5 s
7.4 s
9.2 s
11.1 s
12.9 s
14.7 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
18.6 s · 3.5 MB13 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.5 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
10.5 s · 2.0 MBAbout 2.0 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 10.5 s faster on a phone.
Minify JavaScript
6.6 s · 1.3 MB1.3 MB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Render-blocking requests
3.0 s3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.0 s.
Reduce unused CSS
2.1 s · 393 KiBAbout 393 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.
Font display
1.3 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.3 s).
Mobile performance score: 57
57/100Your mobile performance score is 57. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Minify CSS
600 ms · 68 KiB68 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Legacy JavaScript
350 ms · 45 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 45 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 263 ms
263 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 263 ms of main-thread work and 544 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Clarity and others), adding 956 KiB and 426 ms of main-thread time.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 192 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
38 KiB1 image could be 38 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Document request latency
24 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.0 s
A phone's processor spends 1.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 452 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 213 ms
213 msYour server sent the HTML in 213 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 26.4 s
26.4 sYour largest element takes 26.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Perusahaan Asuransi Umum dengan Penghargaan The Excellent P…”.
Time to Interactive: 27.0 s
27.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 27.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 12.4 s
12.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.7 s
3.7 sThe first text or image appears after 3.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user INP: 258 ms
258 msReal visitors wait 258 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
11 images without width and height
11 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 16% slower for real visitors
+16%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 220 ms to 254 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 669 ms
669 msReal visitors wait 669 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 11% faster for real visitors
-11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 121 ms
121 msScripts block the page for only 121 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.033
0.033The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.033, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.3 MB in 48 requests
4.3 MBYour homepage downloads 4.3 MB in 48 requests on a phone: scripts 3.4 MB (11), stylesheets 411 KiB (5) and images 269 KiB (17). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images over 500 KB
3 images weigh 1.7 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
2 images far larger than shown
885 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example banner-home-personal-mobile.jpg at 1,563 px wide, shown at 178 px. Resized copies would save about 885 KiB.
11 images in older formats
11 images (2.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit
1.22 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.22 g of CO₂e: 146.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
5 text elements with low contrast
5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
2 images without alt text
2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (6 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
4 links without text
4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
1 checks passed
35 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 41 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 35 passed and 6 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (82 characters)
Your title is 82 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Melayani Dengan Hati Lebih Dari 40 Tahun - Asuransi Sinar Mas - Asuransi Sinar Mas”.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is long (243 characters)
Your meta description is 243 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
17 internal links, 7 external
The homepage links to 17 pages on sinarmas.co.id and 7 external pages.
5 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Temukan Produk Asuransi Umum Pilihan Kamu :”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://sinarmas.co.id/home.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.sinarmas.co.id/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://sinarmas.co.id/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
1 page points its canonical at the homepage
https://sinarmas.co.id/read/all declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.
2 pages share a title
https://sinarmas.co.id/personal/produk and https://sinarmas.co.id/personal/layanan all use the title “Produk & Layanan - Asuransi Sinar Mas”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
5 pages share a meta description
https://sinarmas.co.id/personal/produk, https://sinarmas.co.id/personal/layanan, https://sinarmas.co.id/kontak, https://sinarmas.co.id/bisnis and https://sinarmas.co.id/personal use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
9 pages without an H1
https://sinarmas.co.id/call-me, https://sinarmas.co.id/personal/produk, https://sinarmas.co.id/produk-online, https://sinarmas.co.id/personal/layanan, https://sinarmas.co.id/read/all and https://sinarmas.co.id/csr and 3 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 16 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
6 small tap targets
6 of 16 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://www.google.com/cse/static/element/dc6f600a0d4404e5/default_v6+en.css' from origin …”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 88 words
The homepage has only about 88 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
3 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Call Me”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
8 cookies set on arrival
8Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
16 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 16 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at sinarmas.co.id, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- PT iForte Global Internet
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 44 issues on sinarmas.co.id, including 17 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.