Website review, no card needed

sinergie.org logo

sinergie.org website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202634 issues · 72 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on sinergie.org, 10 of them high impact, across 72 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Full-page screenshot of sinergie.org (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. sinergie.org at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. sinergie.org at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. sinergie.org at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. sinergie.org at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. sinergie.org at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. sinergie.org at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. sinergie.org at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. sinergie.org at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

6 to fix62
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.1 s

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.1 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    7.6 MB

    3 images could be 7.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (iubenda, website-files.com and cloudfront.net and others), adding 11.2 MB and 373 ms of main-thread time.

  • website-files.com adds 123 ms

    123 ms

    website-files.com costs a phone 123 ms of main-thread work and 11.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 62

    62/100

    Your mobile performance score is 62 (desktop: 96). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    300 ms · 53 KiB

    5 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (53 KiB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 45 KiB

    About 45 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 69 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    26 KiB

    About 26 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 96 but mobile only 62. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 396 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix67
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 31.5 s

    31.5 s

    Your largest element takes 31.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 33.9 s

    33.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 33.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.2 s

    6.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 4 images without width and height

    4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Not enough real-visitor data yet

    Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

2 checks passed
  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 10 ms

    10 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 10 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

3 to fix45
  • Page weight: 11.2 MB in 41 requests

    11.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 11.2 MB in 41 requests on a phone: images 10.6 MB (21), fonts 327 KiB (3) and scripts 242 KiB (12). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images over 500 KB

    3 images weigh 8.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 6 images in older formats

    6 images (9.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 3.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.17 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.17 g of CO₂e: 380.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9495
  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (41 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 41 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 links without text

    3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 20 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 38 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 43 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 5 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 10080
  • Title is short (15 characters)

    Your title is only 15 characters: “Sinergie | Home”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (209 characters)

    Your meta description is 209 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 22 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 22 pages on sinergie.org and 9 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Case History(1)”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://sinergie.org/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://sinergie.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (700 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix62
  • 2 linked pages are broken

    Your homepage links to https://sinergie.org/projects/project-2 and https://sinergie.org/projects/project-3, which answer with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop them.

  • 2 pages share a title

    / and https://sinergie.org/en all use the title “Sinergie | Home”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 5 pages share a meta description

    https://sinergie.org/us, https://sinergie.org/works, https://sinergie.org/certification, https://sinergie.org/careers and https://sinergie.org/keep-in-touch use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 5 pages without an H1

    https://sinergie.org/works, https://sinergie.org/careers, https://sinergie.org/case-histories/iveco, https://sinergie.org/case-histories/zurich-e-zurich-bank---blue-power and https://sinergie.org/case-histories/confindustria-dispositivi-medici---meeting-istituzionale---insieme-per-un-paese-in-salute have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://sinergie.org/careers has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 11 internal pages checked

    We fetched 11 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 9 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 9 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 2 small tap targets

    2 of 8 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix30
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 354 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 354 words of visible text.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 6 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

2 checks passed
  • Consent tool: iubenda

    A consent management tool (iubenda) loads with the page.

  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at sinergie.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2024.

Stack

CMS
Webflow

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on sinergie.org, including 11 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25